From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347D7C432C0 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6CC20740 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:01:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574690487; bh=RKHkvJasBb9XZlFJJM88//Z1Z+h2at816g2Wx2thnNU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ip64dbuj4nBx0M8VPNOHcvCGDi6Y8+ID50YpteBjPad1vUCH4nXV8dw4U1F6o6lbW yDrb/TgTxJZMu6KO37vhWRuIOYWIyw4e4EZd9rffosItTeqOMkwSbUrkg42q4Au1m3 eCoL4J8Hl6IRLmLmq2fngzeWfrD4p8JogVczJjrc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727897AbfKYOBX (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:01:23 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32872 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727695AbfKYOBX (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:01:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9082D20679; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:01:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574690482; bh=RKHkvJasBb9XZlFJJM88//Z1Z+h2at816g2Wx2thnNU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MWOotXo1F/R2WSj5r8nX+ONxRG0aEigugR2ZzYON2qBwjIPkPxiquPymK1FDusmay xH5zPQBFjnqU7M+6zOLlCMZy7Pwb33qQ9YjPfaDI3fytPtzo/ipcGjTjIC9llPwo4L 0eJc0Y/Oxt49SV4C4jvX4P4VUisv6EXWFaj7G+FY= Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:01:21 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Liu Bo , David Sterba , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 028/237] Btrfs: fix alignment in declaration and prototype of btrfs_get_extent Message-ID: <20191125140121.GD5861@sasha-vm> References: <20191116154113.7417-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20191116154113.7417-28-sashal@kernel.org> <20191118111143.GE3001@twin.jikos.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191118111143.GE3001@twin.jikos.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 12:11:43PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: >On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 10:37:43AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> From: Liu Bo >> >> [ Upstream commit de2c6615dcddf2af868c5cbd1db2e9e73b4beb58 ] >> >> This fixes btrfs_get_extent to be consistent with our existing >> declaration style. > >The patch is pure white space fix with no effects. I don't see that it >would be needed for a followup patch. What was the reason to add it to >autosel/stable ? Oh I grabbed it as a dependency for a follow up patch which I ended up dropping, and forgot this one in. I'll drop it as well, sorry for the noise. -- Thanks, Sasha