From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> To: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/28] btrfs: Get zone information of zoned block devices Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 16:37:32 +0100 Message-ID: <20191204153732.GA2083@Johanness-MacBook-Pro.local> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20191204081735.852438-3-naohiro.aota@wdc.com> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:17:09PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote: [..] > +#define LEN (sizeof(device->fs_info->sb->s_id) + sizeof("(device )") - 1) > + char devstr[LEN]; > + const int len = LEN; > +#undef LEN Why not: const int len = sizeof(device->fs_info->sb->s_id) + sizeof("(device )") - 1; char devstr[len]; But that's bikeshedding territory I admit. > + > + if (!bdev_is_zoned(bdev)) > + return 0; > + > + zone_info = kzalloc(sizeof(*zone_info), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!zone_info) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + zone_sectors = bdev_zone_sectors(bdev); > + ASSERT(is_power_of_2(zone_sectors)); > + zone_info->zone_size = (u64)zone_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT; > + zone_info->zone_size_shift = ilog2(zone_info->zone_size); > + zone_info->nr_zones = nr_sectors >> ilog2(bdev_zone_sectors(bdev)); > + if (nr_sectors & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1)) > + zone_info->nr_zones++; You've already cached the return of bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) in zone_sectors at the beginning of this block and if (x & (y-1)) is the IS_ALIGNED() macro so the above should really be: if (!IS_ALIGNED(nr_sectors, zone_sectors)) zone_info->nr_zones++; > + > + zone_info->seq_zones = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(zone_info->nr_zones), > + sizeof(*zone_info->seq_zones), > + GFP_KERNEL); zone_info->seq_zones = bitmap_zalloc(zone_info->nr_zones, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!zone_info->seq_zones) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto free_zone_info; > + } > + > + zone_info->empty_zones = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(zone_info->nr_zones), > + sizeof(*zone_info->empty_zones), > + GFP_KERNEL); zone_info->empty_zones = bitmap_zalloc(zone_info->nr_zones, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!zone_info->empty_zones) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto free_seq_zones; > + } > + > + zones = kcalloc(BTRFS_REPORT_NR_ZONES, > + sizeof(struct blk_zone), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!zones) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto free_empty_zones; > + } > + I personally would set nreported = 0 here instead in the declaration block. I had to scroll up to see what's the initial value, so I think it makes more sense to initialize it to 0 here. > + /* Get zones type */ > + while (sector < nr_sectors) { > + nr_zones = BTRFS_REPORT_NR_ZONES; > + ret = btrfs_get_dev_zones(device, sector << SECTOR_SHIFT, zones, > + &nr_zones); > + if (ret) > + goto free_zones; > + > + for (i = 0; i < nr_zones; i++) { > + if (zones[i].type == BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ) > + set_bit(nreported, zone_info->seq_zones); > + if (zones[i].cond == BLK_ZONE_COND_EMPTY) > + set_bit(nreported, zone_info->empty_zones); > + nreported++; > + } > + sector = zones[nr_zones - 1].start + zones[nr_zones - 1].len; > + } > + > + if (nreported != zone_info->nr_zones) { > + btrfs_err_in_rcu(device->fs_info, > + "inconsistent number of zones on %s (%u / %u)", > + rcu_str_deref(device->name), nreported, > + zone_info->nr_zones); > + ret = -EIO; > + goto free_zones; > + } > + > + kfree(zones); > + > + device->zone_info = zone_info; > + > + devstr[0] = 0; > + if (device->fs_info) > + snprintf(devstr, len, " (device %s)", > + device->fs_info->sb->s_id); > + > + rcu_read_lock(); > + pr_info( > +"BTRFS info%s: host-%s zoned block device %s, %u zones of %llu sectors", > + devstr, > + bdev_zoned_model(bdev) == BLK_ZONED_HM ? "managed" : "aware", > + rcu_str_deref(device->name), zone_info->nr_zones, > + zone_info->zone_size >> SECTOR_SHIFT); > + rcu_read_unlock(); btrfs_info_in_rcu()? > + > + return 0; > + > +free_zones: > + kfree(zones); > +free_empty_zones: > + kfree(zone_info->empty_zones); bitmap_free(zone_info->empty_zones); > +free_seq_zones: > + kfree(zone_info->seq_zones); bitmap_free(zone_info->seq_zones); > +free_zone_info: > + kfree(zone_info); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +void btrfs_destroy_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device) > +{ > + struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zone_info = device->zone_info; > + > + if (!zone_info) > + return; > + > + kfree(zone_info->seq_zones); > + kfree(zone_info->empty_zones); bitmap_free(zone_info->seq_zones); bitmap_free(zone_info->empty_zones); Thanks, Johannes
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-12-04 8:17 [PATCH v5 00/28] btrfs: zoned block device support Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/28] btrfs: introduce HMZONED feature flag Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/28] btrfs: Get zone information of zoned block devices Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 15:37 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message] 2019-12-04 17:22 ` David Sterba 2019-12-05 6:29 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-05 6:28 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-07 9:47 ` Anand Jain 2019-12-10 4:41 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/28] btrfs: Check and enable HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 16:07 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2019-12-05 5:17 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-05 15:28 ` David Sterba 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/28] btrfs: disallow RAID5/6 in " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/28] btrfs: disallow space_cache " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-05 7:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2019-12-05 15:39 ` David Sterba 2019-12-06 5:32 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-06 15:12 ` David Sterba 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/28] btrfs: disallow NODATACOW " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-05 7:58 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2019-12-05 15:31 ` David Sterba 2019-12-06 5:37 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/28] btrfs: disable fallocate " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-05 8:00 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/28] btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/28] btrfs: align device extent allocation to zone boundary Naohiro Aota 2019-12-05 8:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn 2019-12-06 5:45 ` Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/28] btrfs: do sequential extent allocation in HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/28] btrfs: make unmirroed BGs readonly only if we have at least one writable BG Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/28] btrfs: ensure metadata space available on/after degraded mount in HMZONED Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/28] btrfs: reset zones of unused block groups Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/28] btrfs: redirty released extent buffers in HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/28] btrfs: serialize data allocation and submit IOs Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 16/28] btrfs: implement atomic compressed IO submission Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 17/28] btrfs: support direct write IO in HMZONED Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 18/28] btrfs: serialize meta IOs on HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 19/28] btrfs: wait existing extents before truncating Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 20/28] btrfs: avoid async checksum on HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 21/28] btrfs: disallow mixed-bg in " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 22/28] btrfs: disallow inode_cache " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 23/28] btrfs: support dev-replace " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 24/28] btrfs: enable relocation " Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 25/28] btrfs: relocate block group to repair IO failure in HMZONED Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 26/28] btrfs: split alloc_log_tree() Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 27/28] btrfs: enable tree-log on HMZONED mode Naohiro Aota 2019-12-04 8:17 ` [PATCH v5 28/28] btrfs: enable to mount HMZONED incompat flag Naohiro Aota
Reply instructions: You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191204153732.GA2083@Johanness-MacBook-Pro.local \ --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \ --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \ --cc=clm@fb.com \ --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \ --cc=dsterba@suse.com \ --cc=hare@suse.com \ --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \ --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \ --cc=nborisov@suse.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0 linux-btrfs/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-btrfs linux-btrfs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs \ linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org public-inbox-index linux-btrfs Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git