linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix infinite loop during fsync after rename operations
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:20:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121132037.GQ3929@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115132135.23994-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 01:21:35PM +0000, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> 
> Recently fsstress (from fstests) sporadically started to trigger an
> infinite loop during fsync operations. This turned out to be because
> support for the rename exchange and whiteout operations was added to
> fsstress in fstests. These operations, unlike any others in fsstress,
> cause file names to be reused, whence triggering this issue. However
> it's not necessary to use rename exchange and rename whiteout operations
> trigger this issue, simple rename operations and file creations are
> enough to trigger the issue.
> 
> The issue boils down to when we are logging inodes that conflict (that
> had the name of any inode we need to log during the fsync operation),
> we keep logging them even if they were already logged before, and after
> that we check if there's any other inode that conflicts with them and
> then add it again to the list of inodes to log. Skipping already logged
> inodes fixes the issue.
> 
> Consider the following example:
> 
>   $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
>   $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
> 
>   $ mkdir /mnt/testdir                           # inode 257
> 
>   $ touch /mnt/testdir/zz                        # inode 258
>   $ ln /mnt/testdir/zz /mnt/testdir/zz_link
> 
>   $ touch /mnt/testdir/a                         # inode 259
> 
>   $ sync
> 
>   # The following 3 renames achieve the same result as a rename exchange
>   # operation (<rename_exchange> /mnt/testdir/zz_link to /mnt/testdir/a).
> 
>   $ mv /mnt/testdir/a /mnt/testdir/a/tmp
>   $ mv /mnt/testdir/zz_link /mnt/testdir/a
>   $ mv /mnt/testdir/a/tmp /mnt/testdir/zz_link
> 
>   # The following rename and file creation give the same result as a
>   # rename whiteout operation (<rename_whiteout> zz to a2).
> 
>   $ mv /mnt/testdir/zz /mnt/testdir/a2
>   $ touch /mnt/testdir/zz                        # inode 260
> 
>   $ xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/testdir/zz
>     --> results in the infinite loop
> 
> The following steps happen:
> 
> 1) When logging inode 260, we find that its reference named "zz" was
>    used by inode 258 in the previous transaction (through the commit
>    root), so inode 258 is added to the list of conflicting indoes that
>    need to be logged;
> 
> 2) After logging inode 258, we find that its reference named "a" was
>    used by inode 259 in the previous transaction, and therefore we add
>    inode 259 to the list of conflicting inodes to be logged;
> 
> 3) After logging inode 259, we find that its reference named "zz_link"
>    was used by inode 258 in the previous transaction - we add inode 258
>    to the list of conflicting inodes to log, again - we had already
>    logged it before at step 3. After logging it again, we find again
>    that inode 259 conflicts with him, and we add again 259 to the list,
>    etc - we end up repeating all the previous steps.
> 
> So fix this by skipping logging of conflicting inodes that were already
> logged.
> 
> Fixes: 6b5fc433a7ad67 ("Btrfs: fix fsync after succession of renames of different files")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

Added to misc-next, thanks.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 13:21 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix infinite loop during fsync after rename operations fdmanana
2020-01-16 16:03 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-21 13:20 ` David Sterba [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200121132037.GQ3929@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).