From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AD5C2D0E5 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2141B206F6 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727386AbgCYSbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:31:12 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50590 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727027AbgCYSbL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 14:31:11 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72AFAC79; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id E7B75DA730; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:30:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 19:30:38 +0100 From: David Sterba To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/39] btrfs: qgroup: Use backref cache based backref walk for commit roots Message-ID: <20200325183038.GF5920@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20200317081125.36289-1-wqu@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317081125.36289-1-wqu@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:10:46PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > This patchset is based on an OLD misc-next branch, please inform me > before trying to merge, so I can rebase it to latest misc-next. > (There will be tons of conflicts) The were, I tried to get a sense how much work it would be. There are some new patches in misc-next that are not in the misc-next you used, causing conflicts. The branch misc-5.7 is now in freeze mode, I'm not expecting any changes so you could rebase it on top of that, any further rebase should be easy. New patches are on the way to misc-next, so this won't be a good base for the upcoming weeks but the pull request branch and later 5.7-rc1 are.