From: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
To: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Cc: Hans van Kranenburg <hans@knorrie.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Q: what exactly does SSD mode still do?
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 15:35:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200328193520.GZ13306@hungrycats.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <116cfdc1-410a-5e09-2fb2-5da2c0fa428a@applied-asynchrony.com>
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 3/26/20 11:21 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > 2) Metadata "cluster allocator" write behavior:
> >
> > *empty_cluster = SZ_64K # nossd
> > *empty_cluster = SZ_2M # ssd
> >
> > This happens in extent-tree.c.
>
> 2M used to be a common erase block size on SSDs. Or maybe it's just
> a nice round number.. ¯\(ツ)/¯
As a side-effect, 2M write clusters close the write hole on raid5/6 if you
have an array that is a power of 2 data disks wide. This capability is
wasted when it's only available through the 'ssd' mount option.
The behavior could be quite useful if it was properly integrated with
the raid5/6 stuff: set *empty_cluster = block group data width, make
sure it's aligned to raid5/6 stripe boundaries, and use it for both data
and metadata.
It works by effectively making partially-filled clusters read-only.
If we can guarantee that clusters are aligned to raid5/6 data/parity block
boundaries, then btrfs can't allocate new data in partially filled raid5/6
stripes, so it won't break the parity relation and won't have write hole.
> cheers,
> Holger
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=08635bae0b4ceb08fe4c156a11c83baec397d36d
>
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ba8a9d07954397f0645cf62bcc1ef536e8e7ba24
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-28 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-26 18:16 Q: what exactly does SSD mode still do? Holger Hoffstätte
2020-03-26 22:21 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2020-03-27 10:29 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2020-03-28 19:35 ` Zygo Blaxell [this message]
2020-03-28 21:31 ` Hans van Kranenburg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200328193520.GZ13306@hungrycats.org \
--to=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
--cc=hans@knorrie.org \
--cc=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).