From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314E3C433E2 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE2420665 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728280AbgIPUJ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:09:28 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36634 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727045AbgIPRdm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:33:42 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4712B21D; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id 64B60DA7C7; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:06:12 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/19] btrfs: make btree inode io_tree has its special owner Message-ID: <20200916160612.GO1791@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <20200915053532.63279-1-wqu@suse.com> <20200915053532.63279-15-wqu@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200915053532.63279-15-wqu@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:35:27PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Btree inode is pretty special compared to all other inode extent io > tree, although it has a btrfs inode, it doesn't have the track_uptodate > bit at all. > > This means a lot of things like extent locking doesn't even need to be > applied to btree io tree. > > Since it's so special, adds a new owner value for it to make debuging a > little easier. > > Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo > --- > fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +- > fs/btrfs/extent-io-tree.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > index 1ba16951ccaa..82a841bd0702 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c > @@ -2126,7 +2126,7 @@ static void btrfs_init_btree_inode(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) > > RB_CLEAR_NODE(&BTRFS_I(inode)->rb_node); > extent_io_tree_init(fs_info, &BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, > - IO_TREE_INODE_IO, inode); > + IO_TREE_BTREE_IO, inode); This looks like an independent patch, so it could be taken separately.