linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com, hare@suse.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 02/41] iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 10:55:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110185506.GD9685@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72734501cc1d9e08117c215ed60f7b38e3665f14.1605007036.git.naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 08:26:05PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote:
> A ZONE_APPEND bio must follow hardware restrictions (e.g. not exceeding
> max_zone_append_sectors) not to be split. bio_iov_iter_get_pages builds
> such restricted bio using __bio_iov_append_get_pages if bio_op(bio) ==
> REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND.
> 
> To utilize it, we need to set the bio_op before calling
> bio_iov_iter_get_pages(). This commit introduces IOMAP_F_ZONE_APPEND, so
> that iomap user can set the flag to indicate they want REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND
> and restricted bio.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/direct-io.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/iomap.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index c1aafb2ab990..f04572a55a09 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,34 @@ iomap_dio_zero(struct iomap_dio *dio, struct iomap *iomap, loff_t pos,
>  	iomap_dio_submit_bio(dio, iomap, bio, pos);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Figure out the bio's operation flags from the dio request, the
> + * mapping, and whether or not we want FUA.  Note that we can end up
> + * clearing the WRITE_FUA flag in the dio request.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned int
> +iomap_dio_bio_opflags(struct iomap_dio *dio, struct iomap *iomap, bool use_fua)

Hmm, just to check my understanding of what iomap has to do to support
all this:

When we're wanting to use a ZONE_APPEND command, the @iomap structure
has to have IOMAP_F_ZONE_APPEND set in iomap->flags, iomap->type is set
to IOMAP_MAPPED, but what should iomap->addr be set to?

I gather from what I see in zonefs and the relevant NVME proposal that
iomap->addr should be set to the (byte) address of the zone we want to
append to?  And if we do that, then bio->bi_iter.bi_sector will be set
to sector address of iomap->addr, right?

(I got lost trying to figure out how btrfs sets ->addr for appends.)

Then when the IO completes, the block layer sets bio->bi_iter.bi_sector
to wherever the drive told it that it actually wrote the bio, right?

If that's true, then that implies that need_zeroout must always be false
for an append operation, right?  Does that also mean that the directio
request has to be aligned to an fs block and not just the sector size?

Can userspace send a directio append that crosses a zone boundary?  If
so, what happens if a direct append to a lower address fails but a
direct append to a higher address succeeds?

> +{
> +	unsigned int opflags = REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE;
> +
> +	if (!(dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE)) {
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_ZONE_APPEND);
> +		return REQ_OP_READ;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (iomap->flags & IOMAP_F_ZONE_APPEND)
> +		opflags |= REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND;
> +	else
> +		opflags |= REQ_OP_WRITE;
> +
> +	if (use_fua)
> +		opflags |= REQ_FUA;
> +	else
> +		dio->flags &= ~IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA;
> +
> +	return opflags;
> +}
> +
>  static loff_t
>  iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
>  		struct iomap_dio *dio, struct iomap *iomap)
> @@ -278,6 +306,13 @@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
>  		bio->bi_private = dio;
>  		bio->bi_end_io = iomap_dio_bio_end_io;
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Set the operation flags early so that bio_iov_iter_get_pages
> +		 * can set up the page vector appropriately for a ZONE_APPEND
> +		 * operation.
> +		 */
> +		bio->bi_opf = iomap_dio_bio_opflags(dio, iomap, use_fua);

I'm also vaguely wondering how to communicate the write location back to
the filesystem when the bio completes?  btrfs handles the bio completion
completely so it doesn't have a problem, but for other filesystems
(cough future xfs cough) either we'd have to add a new callback for
append operations; or I guess everyone could hook the bio endio.

Admittedly that's not really your problem, and for all I know hch is
already working on this.

--D

> +
>  		ret = bio_iov_iter_get_pages(bio, dio->submit.iter);
>  		if (unlikely(ret)) {
>  			/*
> @@ -292,14 +327,8 @@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length,
>  
>  		n = bio->bi_iter.bi_size;
>  		if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_WRITE) {
> -			bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_SYNC | REQ_IDLE;
> -			if (use_fua)
> -				bio->bi_opf |= REQ_FUA;
> -			else
> -				dio->flags &= ~IOMAP_DIO_WRITE_FUA;
>  			task_io_account_write(n);
>  		} else {
> -			bio->bi_opf = REQ_OP_READ;
>  			if (dio->flags & IOMAP_DIO_DIRTY)
>  				bio_set_pages_dirty(bio);
>  		}
> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> index 4d1d3c3469e9..1bccd1880d0d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct vm_fault;
>  #define IOMAP_F_SHARED		0x04
>  #define IOMAP_F_MERGED		0x08
>  #define IOMAP_F_BUFFER_HEAD	0x10
> +#define IOMAP_F_ZONE_APPEND	0x20
>  
>  /*
>   * Flags set by the core iomap code during operations:
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-10 11:26 [PATCH v10 00/41] btrfs: zoned block device support Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 01/41] block: add bio_add_zone_append_page Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 17:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-11  7:20     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 02/41] iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 17:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-10 18:55   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-11-10 19:01     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-11-24 11:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-30 18:11   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-01 10:16     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-09  9:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-09 10:08     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-09 10:10       ` hch
2020-12-09 10:16         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-09 13:38           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-11  7:26             ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-12-11 21:24               ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-12-12 10:22                 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 03/41] btrfs: introduce ZONED feature flag Naohiro Aota
2020-11-19 21:31   ` David Sterba
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 04/41] btrfs: get zone information of zoned block devices Naohiro Aota
2020-11-12  6:57   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-12  7:35     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-12  7:44       ` Damien Le Moal
2020-11-12  9:44         ` Anand Jain
2020-11-13 21:34           ` David Sterba
2020-11-12  9:39     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-12 12:57     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-11-18 11:17       ` Anand Jain
2020-11-30 11:16         ` Anand Jain
2020-11-25 21:47   ` David Sterba
2020-11-25 22:07     ` David Sterba
2020-11-25 23:50     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-11-26 14:11       ` David Sterba
2020-11-25 22:16   ` David Sterba
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 05/41] btrfs: check and enable ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-18 11:29   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-27 18:44     ` David Sterba
2020-11-30 12:12       ` Anand Jain
2020-11-30 13:15         ` Damien Le Moal
2020-12-01  2:19           ` Anand Jain
2020-12-01  2:29             ` Damien Le Moal
2020-12-01  5:53               ` Anand Jain
2020-12-01  6:09                 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-12-01  7:12                   ` Anand Jain
2020-12-01 10:45               ` Graham Cobb
2020-12-01 11:03                 ` Damien Le Moal
2020-12-01 11:11                   ` hch
2020-12-01 11:27                     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 06/41] btrfs: introduce max_zone_append_size Naohiro Aota
2020-11-19  9:23   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-27 18:47     ` David Sterba
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 07/41] btrfs: disallow space_cache in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-19 10:42   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-20  4:08     ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 08/41] btrfs: disallow NODATACOW " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-20  4:17   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-23 17:21     ` David Sterba
2020-11-24  3:29       ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 09/41] btrfs: disable fallocate " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-20  4:28   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 10/41] btrfs: disallow mixed-bg " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-20  4:32   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 11/41] btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-23 17:46   ` David Sterba
2020-11-24  9:30     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-11-24  6:46   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-24  7:16     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 12/41] btrfs: implement zoned chunk allocator Naohiro Aota
2020-11-24 11:36   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-25  1:57     ` Naohiro Aota
2020-11-25  7:17       ` Anand Jain
2020-11-25 11:48         ` Naohiro Aota
2020-11-25  9:59       ` Graham Cobb
2020-11-25 11:50         ` Naohiro Aota
2020-12-09  5:27   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 13/41] btrfs: verify device extent is aligned to zone Naohiro Aota
2020-11-27  6:27   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 14/41] btrfs: load zone's alloction offset Naohiro Aota
2020-12-08  9:54   ` Anand Jain
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 15/41] btrfs: emulate write pointer for conventional zones Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 16/41] btrfs: track unusable bytes for zones Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 17/41] btrfs: do sequential extent allocation in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 18/41] btrfs: reset zones of unused block groups Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 19/41] btrfs: redirty released extent buffers in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 20/41] btrfs: extract page adding function Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 21/41] btrfs: use bio_add_zone_append_page for zoned btrfs Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 22/41] btrfs: handle REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND as writing Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 23/41] btrfs: split ordered extent when bio is sent Naohiro Aota
2020-11-11  2:01   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11  2:26   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11  3:46   ` kernel test robot
2020-11-11  3:46   ` [RFC PATCH] btrfs: extract_ordered_extent() can be static kernel test robot
2020-11-11  4:12   ` [PATCH v10.1 23/41] btrfs: split ordered extent when bio is sent Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 24/41] btrfs: extend btrfs_rmap_block for specifying a device Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 25/41] btrfs: use ZONE_APPEND write for ZONED btrfs Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 26/41] btrfs: enable zone append writing for direct IO Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 27/41] btrfs: introduce dedicated data write path for ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 28/41] btrfs: serialize meta IOs on " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 29/41] btrfs: wait existing extents before truncating Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 30/41] btrfs: avoid async metadata checksum on ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 31/41] btrfs: mark block groups to copy for device-replace Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 32/41] btrfs: implement cloning for ZONED device-replace Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 33/41] btrfs: implement copying " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 34/41] btrfs: support dev-replace in ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 35/41] btrfs: enable relocation " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 36/41] btrfs: relocate block group to repair IO failure in ZONED Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 37/41] btrfs: split alloc_log_tree() Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 38/41] btrfs: extend zoned allocator to use dedicated tree-log block group Naohiro Aota
2020-11-11  4:58   ` [PATCH v10.1 " Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 39/41] btrfs: serialize log transaction on ZONED mode Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 40/41] btrfs: reorder log node allocation Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 11:26 ` [PATCH v10 41/41] btrfs: enable to mount ZONED incompat flag Naohiro Aota
2020-11-10 14:00 ` [PATCH v10 00/41] btrfs: zoned block device support Anand Jain
2020-11-11  5:07   ` Naohiro Aota
2020-11-27 19:28 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201110185506.GD9685@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).