From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9ADC4320A for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD907610D0 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232867AbhHXQvw (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:51:52 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:50430 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232964AbhHXQvt (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:51:49 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97F31FDB4; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:51:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1629823864; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lrD8/TfgZZ2rbEOKvBikcKXZ9pbN0ssVlyGspMilCo8=; b=o6uPc0vldfqNzDvyQuOJ5yYBgglYMNMH5Q88O9wn3UD5+YDyDPftB8/Wy+IrUWI/VvYPY8 Ni+qyAe9nYm4f5IK4VKi1AJM9mzmWBha9U/TT17fBmpYAuanySGuCTGugoSTTRgzMjE6yu avfCxtKrchvIJwQmURs+8xQHeZfncbU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1629823864; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lrD8/TfgZZ2rbEOKvBikcKXZ9pbN0ssVlyGspMilCo8=; b=mxzSUgu94cevvfmN+t5McAliBYkWquBe8ixr+w2JWLSlUVCDrmZ96u0m7kUWnsriBJhlJv NkGjnLiwWMRbz8DA== Received: from ds.suse.cz (ds.suse.cz [10.100.12.205]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19BCA3BBA; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 16:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 10065) id B2056DA85B; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:48:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:48:17 +0200 From: David Sterba To: Josef Bacik Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] btrfs-progs: check blocks in btrfs_next_sibling_block Message-ID: <20210824164817.GE3379@twin.jikos.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Josef Bacik , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com References: <0bd15dc74561eba6fd6dc095848e3ba28539d6d3.1629746415.git.josef@toxicpanda.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0bd15dc74561eba6fd6dc095848e3ba28539d6d3.1629746415.git.josef@toxicpanda.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 03:23:06PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > By enabling the lowmem checks properly I uncovered the case where test > 007 will infinite loop at the detection stage. This is because when BTW, short test references should be eg. fsck/007, here' it's clear from the context that it's for check/fsck.