linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: extract out zone cache usage into it's own helper
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 07:05:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221219070514.tgfqoiethziuwfdq@naota-xeon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af6c527cbd8bdc782e50bd33996ee83acc3a16fb.1671221596.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>

On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 03:15:56PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> There's a special case for loading the device zone info if we have the
> zone cache which is a fair bit of code.  Extract this out into it's own
> helper to clean up the code a little bit, and as a side effect it fixes
> an uninitialized error we get with -Wmaybe-uninitialized where it
> thought zno may have been uninitialized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

I'm going to rewrite the code around here with the following WIP branch, to
improve the zone caching.

https://github.com/naota/linux/commits/feature/zone-cache

Specifically, this commit removes the for-loop and the "if (i ==
*nr_zones)" block you moved in this patch. So, the resulting code will be
small enough to keep it there.

https://github.com/naota/linux/commit/8d592ac744111bb2f51595a1608beecadb2c5d03

Could you wait for a while for me to clean-up and send the series? I'll
also check the series with -Wmaybe-uninitialized.

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> index a759668477bb..f3640ab95e5e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> @@ -216,11 +216,46 @@ static int emulate_report_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
>  	return i;
>  }
>  
> +static int load_zones_from_cache(struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo, u64 pos,
> +				 struct blk_zone *zones, unsigned int *nr_zones)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	u32 zno;
> +
> +	if (!zinfo->zone_cache)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
> +	zno = pos >> zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We cannot report zones beyond the zone end. So, it is OK to
> +	 * cap *nr_zones to at the end.
> +	 */
> +	*nr_zones = min_t(u32, *nr_zones, zinfo->nr_zones - zno);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < *nr_zones; i++) {
> +		struct blk_zone *zone_info;
> +
> +		zone_info = &zinfo->zone_cache[zno + i];
> +		if (!zone_info->len)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (i == *nr_zones) {
> +		/* Cache hit on all the zones */
> +		memcpy(zones, zinfo->zone_cache + zno,
> +		       sizeof(*zinfo->zone_cache) * *nr_zones);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
>  static int btrfs_get_dev_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
>  			       struct blk_zone *zones, unsigned int *nr_zones)
>  {
>  	struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo = device->zone_info;
> -	u32 zno;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!*nr_zones)
> @@ -233,32 +268,8 @@ static int btrfs_get_dev_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Check cache */
> -	if (zinfo->zone_cache) {
> -		unsigned int i;
> -
> -		ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
> -		zno = pos >> zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> -		/*
> -		 * We cannot report zones beyond the zone end. So, it is OK to
> -		 * cap *nr_zones to at the end.
> -		 */
> -		*nr_zones = min_t(u32, *nr_zones, zinfo->nr_zones - zno);
> -
> -		for (i = 0; i < *nr_zones; i++) {
> -			struct blk_zone *zone_info;
> -
> -			zone_info = &zinfo->zone_cache[zno + i];
> -			if (!zone_info->len)
> -				break;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (i == *nr_zones) {
> -			/* Cache hit on all the zones */
> -			memcpy(zones, zinfo->zone_cache + zno,
> -			       sizeof(*zinfo->zone_cache) * *nr_zones);
> -			return 0;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	if (!load_zones_from_cache(zinfo, pos, zones, nr_zones))
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	ret = blkdev_report_zones(device->bdev, pos >> SECTOR_SHIFT, *nr_zones,
>  				  copy_zone_info_cb, zones);
> @@ -274,9 +285,15 @@ static int btrfs_get_dev_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
>  		return -EIO;
>  
>  	/* Populate cache */
> -	if (zinfo->zone_cache)
> +	if (zinfo->zone_cache) {
> +		u32 zno;
> +
> +		ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
> +		zno = pos >> zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> +
>  		memcpy(zinfo->zone_cache + zno, zones,
>  		       sizeof(*zinfo->zone_cache) * *nr_zones);
> +	}
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.26.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-16 20:15 [PATCH 0/8] Fixup uninitialized warnings and enable extra checks Josef Bacik
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in run_one_async_start Josef Bacik
2022-12-17  0:15   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19  7:51   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-20 19:03     ` David Sterba
2022-12-21 18:26     ` David Sterba
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents Josef Bacik
2022-12-17  0:16   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19  7:53   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning from get_inode_gen usage Josef Bacik
2022-12-17  0:16   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19  7:55   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-20 19:16   ` David Sterba
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in btrfs_update_block_group Josef Bacik
2022-12-17  0:16   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19  7:56   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in __set_extent_bit and convert_extent_bit Josef Bacik
2022-12-17  0:17   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: extract out zone cache usage into it's own helper Josef Bacik
2022-12-19  7:05   ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2022-12-20 19:24     ` David Sterba
2022-12-21 16:47       ` Naohiro Aota
2022-12-21 18:08         ` David Sterba
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in btrfs_sb_log_location Josef Bacik
2022-12-19  6:23   ` Naohiro Aota
2022-12-19  7:59   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: turn on -Wmaybe-uninitialized Josef Bacik
2022-12-17  0:18   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26  4:17   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-12-26 14:04     ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-02 12:42       ` David Sterba
2023-02-22  2:59   ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-22 16:38     ` David Sterba
2023-02-22 17:18       ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-12 13:06         ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-12 14:37           ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-12 14:57             ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-26 18:03             ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-14 21:59           ` David Sterba
2023-02-24 17:22     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-16 23:55 ` [PATCH 0/8] Fixup uninitialized warnings and enable extra checks Qu Wenruo
2022-12-17  0:07   ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-20 19:37 ` David Sterba
2022-12-21 18:36   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221219070514.tgfqoiethziuwfdq@naota-xeon \
    --to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).