From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: extract out zone cache usage into it's own helper
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 07:05:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221219070514.tgfqoiethziuwfdq@naota-xeon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af6c527cbd8bdc782e50bd33996ee83acc3a16fb.1671221596.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 03:15:56PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> There's a special case for loading the device zone info if we have the
> zone cache which is a fair bit of code. Extract this out into it's own
> helper to clean up the code a little bit, and as a side effect it fixes
> an uninitialized error we get with -Wmaybe-uninitialized where it
> thought zno may have been uninitialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
I'm going to rewrite the code around here with the following WIP branch, to
improve the zone caching.
https://github.com/naota/linux/commits/feature/zone-cache
Specifically, this commit removes the for-loop and the "if (i ==
*nr_zones)" block you moved in this patch. So, the resulting code will be
small enough to keep it there.
https://github.com/naota/linux/commit/8d592ac744111bb2f51595a1608beecadb2c5d03
Could you wait for a while for me to clean-up and send the series? I'll
also check the series with -Wmaybe-uninitialized.
> ---
> fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> index a759668477bb..f3640ab95e5e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
> @@ -216,11 +216,46 @@ static int emulate_report_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
> return i;
> }
>
> +static int load_zones_from_cache(struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo, u64 pos,
> + struct blk_zone *zones, unsigned int *nr_zones)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + u32 zno;
> +
> + if (!zinfo->zone_cache)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
> + zno = pos >> zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> +
> + /*
> + * We cannot report zones beyond the zone end. So, it is OK to
> + * cap *nr_zones to at the end.
> + */
> + *nr_zones = min_t(u32, *nr_zones, zinfo->nr_zones - zno);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < *nr_zones; i++) {
> + struct blk_zone *zone_info;
> +
> + zone_info = &zinfo->zone_cache[zno + i];
> + if (!zone_info->len)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (i == *nr_zones) {
> + /* Cache hit on all the zones */
> + memcpy(zones, zinfo->zone_cache + zno,
> + sizeof(*zinfo->zone_cache) * *nr_zones);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> static int btrfs_get_dev_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
> struct blk_zone *zones, unsigned int *nr_zones)
> {
> struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zinfo = device->zone_info;
> - u32 zno;
> int ret;
>
> if (!*nr_zones)
> @@ -233,32 +268,8 @@ static int btrfs_get_dev_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
> }
>
> /* Check cache */
> - if (zinfo->zone_cache) {
> - unsigned int i;
> -
> - ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
> - zno = pos >> zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> - /*
> - * We cannot report zones beyond the zone end. So, it is OK to
> - * cap *nr_zones to at the end.
> - */
> - *nr_zones = min_t(u32, *nr_zones, zinfo->nr_zones - zno);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < *nr_zones; i++) {
> - struct blk_zone *zone_info;
> -
> - zone_info = &zinfo->zone_cache[zno + i];
> - if (!zone_info->len)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (i == *nr_zones) {
> - /* Cache hit on all the zones */
> - memcpy(zones, zinfo->zone_cache + zno,
> - sizeof(*zinfo->zone_cache) * *nr_zones);
> - return 0;
> - }
> - }
> + if (!load_zones_from_cache(zinfo, pos, zones, nr_zones))
> + return 0;
>
> ret = blkdev_report_zones(device->bdev, pos >> SECTOR_SHIFT, *nr_zones,
> copy_zone_info_cb, zones);
> @@ -274,9 +285,15 @@ static int btrfs_get_dev_zones(struct btrfs_device *device, u64 pos,
> return -EIO;
>
> /* Populate cache */
> - if (zinfo->zone_cache)
> + if (zinfo->zone_cache) {
> + u32 zno;
> +
> + ASSERT(IS_ALIGNED(pos, zinfo->zone_size));
> + zno = pos >> zinfo->zone_size_shift;
> +
> memcpy(zinfo->zone_cache + zno, zones,
> sizeof(*zinfo->zone_cache) * *nr_zones);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.26.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-19 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-16 20:15 [PATCH 0/8] Fixup uninitialized warnings and enable extra checks Josef Bacik
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in run_one_async_start Josef Bacik
2022-12-17 0:15 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19 7:51 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-20 19:03 ` David Sterba
2022-12-21 18:26 ` David Sterba
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in btrfs_cleanup_ordered_extents Josef Bacik
2022-12-17 0:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19 7:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning from get_inode_gen usage Josef Bacik
2022-12-17 0:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19 7:55 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-20 19:16 ` David Sterba
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in btrfs_update_block_group Josef Bacik
2022-12-17 0:16 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-19 7:56 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in __set_extent_bit and convert_extent_bit Josef Bacik
2022-12-17 0:17 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: extract out zone cache usage into it's own helper Josef Bacik
2022-12-19 7:05 ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2022-12-20 19:24 ` David Sterba
2022-12-21 16:47 ` Naohiro Aota
2022-12-21 18:08 ` David Sterba
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: fix uninit warning in btrfs_sb_log_location Josef Bacik
2022-12-19 6:23 ` Naohiro Aota
2022-12-19 7:59 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2022-12-16 20:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: turn on -Wmaybe-uninitialized Josef Bacik
2022-12-17 0:18 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-26 4:17 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-12-26 14:04 ` Naresh Kamboju
2023-01-02 12:42 ` David Sterba
2023-02-22 2:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-02-22 16:38 ` David Sterba
2023-02-22 17:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-12 13:06 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-12 14:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2023-03-12 14:57 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-26 18:03 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-14 21:59 ` David Sterba
2023-02-24 17:22 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-16 23:55 ` [PATCH 0/8] Fixup uninitialized warnings and enable extra checks Qu Wenruo
2022-12-17 0:07 ` Qu Wenruo
2022-12-20 19:37 ` David Sterba
2022-12-21 18:36 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221219070514.tgfqoiethziuwfdq@naota-xeon \
--to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).