From: Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] btrfs: simplify btrfs_split_ordered_extent
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 07:52:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230324075248.37cagxzdugxjovlp@naota-xeon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230324023207.544800-7-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:32:02AM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> btrfs_split_ordered_extent is only ever asked to split out the beginning
> of an ordered_extent. Change it to only take a len to split out, and
> switch it to allocate the new extent for the beginning, as that helps
> with callers that want to keep a pointer to the ordered_extent that
> it is stealing from.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 8 +-------
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c | 28 ++++++++++++----------------
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 3 +--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 2cbc6c316effc1..bff23bac85f2ef 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -2646,17 +2646,11 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_extract_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_bio *bbio)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - /* The bio must be entirely covered by the ordered extent */
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len > ordered_len)) {
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> /* No need to split if the ordered extent covers the entire bio */
> if (ordered->disk_num_bytes == len)
> goto out;
>
> - ret = btrfs_split_ordered_extent(ordered, len, 0);
> + ret = btrfs_split_ordered_extent(ordered, len);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> ret = split_zoned_em(inode, bbio->file_offset, ordered_len, len, 0);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> index 4b46406c0c8af5..1d5971b6e68c66 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
> @@ -1138,17 +1138,19 @@ static int clone_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pos,
> ordered->compress_type);
> }
>
> -int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pre,
> - u64 post)
> +/* split out a new ordered extent for this first @len bytes of @ordered */
> +int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 len)
> {
> struct inode *inode = ordered->inode;
> struct btrfs_ordered_inode_tree *tree = &BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_tree;
> - struct rb_node *node;
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(inode->i_sb);
> - int ret = 0;
> + struct rb_node *node;
>
> trace_btrfs_ordered_extent_split(BTRFS_I(inode), ordered);
>
> + /* The bio must be entirely covered by the ordered extent */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len > ordered->num_bytes))
> + return -EINVAL;
Can we also reject "len == ordered->num_bytes" case here? So, we will never
modify the ordered extent to have
ordered->{num_bytes,disk_num_bytes,bytes_left} == 0.
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
> /* We cannot split once end_bio'd ordered extent */
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ordered->bytes_left != ordered->disk_num_bytes))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1167,11 +1169,11 @@ int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pre,
> if (tree->last == node)
> tree->last = NULL;
>
> - ordered->file_offset += pre;
> - ordered->disk_bytenr += pre;
> - ordered->num_bytes -= (pre + post);
> - ordered->disk_num_bytes -= (pre + post);
> - ordered->bytes_left -= (pre + post);
> + ordered->file_offset += len;
> + ordered->disk_bytenr += len;
> + ordered->num_bytes -= len;
> + ordered->disk_num_bytes -= len;
> + ordered->bytes_left -= len;
>
> /* Re-insert the node */
> node = tree_insert(&tree->tree, ordered->file_offset, &ordered->rb_node);
> @@ -1182,13 +1184,7 @@ int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pre,
>
> spin_unlock_irq(&tree->lock);
>
> - if (pre)
> - ret = clone_ordered_extent(ordered, 0, pre);
> - if (ret == 0 && post)
> - ret = clone_ordered_extent(ordered, pre + ordered->disk_num_bytes,
> - post);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return clone_ordered_extent(ordered, 0, len);
> }
>
> int __init ordered_data_init(void)
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
> index 18007f9c00add8..f0f1138d23c331 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h
> @@ -212,8 +212,7 @@ void btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start,
> struct extent_state **cached_state);
> bool btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end,
> struct extent_state **cached_state);
> -int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 pre,
> - u64 post);
> +int btrfs_split_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered, u64 len);
> int __init ordered_data_init(void);
> void __cold ordered_data_exit(void);
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 2:31 btrfs: fix corruption caused by partial dio writes v6 Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:31 ` [PATCH 01/11] btrfs: add function to create and return an ordered extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 5:47 ` Naohiro Aota
2023-03-25 8:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:31 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs: pass flags as unsigned long to btrfs_add_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 4:53 ` Naohiro Aota
2023-03-24 2:31 ` [PATCH 03/11] btrfs: stash ordered extent in dio_data during iomap dio Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 7:41 ` Naohiro Aota
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] btrfs: move ordered_extent internal sanity checks into btrfs_split_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 05/11] btrfs: simplify btrfs_extract_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 6:07 ` Naohiro Aota
2023-03-25 8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs: simplify btrfs_split_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 7:52 ` Naohiro Aota [this message]
2023-03-25 8:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 07/11] btrfs: fold btrfs_clone_ordered_extent into btrfs_split_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 08/11] btrfs: simplify split_zoned_em Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 09/11] btrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_extract_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 10/11] btrfs: don't split nocow extent_maps in btrfs_extract_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 2:32 ` [PATCH 11/11] btrfs: split partial dio bios before submit Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-24 13:10 ` btrfs: fix corruption caused by partial dio writes v6 Johannes Thumshirn
2023-03-24 16:36 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2023-03-28 5:19 btrfs: fix corruption caused by partial dio writes v7 Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-28 5:19 ` [PATCH 06/11] btrfs: simplify btrfs_split_ordered_extent Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230324075248.37cagxzdugxjovlp@naota-xeon \
--to=naohiro.aota@wdc.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).