linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] btrfs: inode management and memory consumption improvements
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 19:56:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240509175633.GO13977@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1715169723.git.fdmanana@suse.com>

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:17:23PM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
> 
> Some inode related improvements, to use an xarray to track open inodes per
> root instead of a red black tree, reduce lock contention and use less memory
> per btrfs inode, so now we can fit 4 inodes per 4K page instead of 3.
> More details in the the change logs.

Outstanding! You managed to reduce the size by 48 bytes, on my config
from 1080 to 1032. Which unfortunately means it's still 3 inodes in a
page. The config is maximal regarding the conditional features that
affect size of struct inode. All of them could be enabled on distro
kernels (checked on openSUSE):

Ifdefs in include/linux/fs.h struct inode:

#ifdef CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK
#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
#ifdef CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION
#ifdef CONFIG_FS_VERITY

There's also #ifdef __NEED_I_SIZE_ORDERED but that's for 32bit only.

This is the pahole diff summary before and after the patchset on
for-next with my reference release config:

 -       /* size: 1080, cachelines: 17, members: 39 */
 -       /* sum members: 1075, holes: 2, sum holes: 5 */
 -       /* forced alignments: 2 */
 -       /* last cacheline: 56 bytes */
 +       /* size: 1032, cachelines: 17, members: 36 */
 +       /* sum members: 1026, holes: 2, sum holes: 6 */
 +       /* forced alignments: 1 */
 +       /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */

The sum is still over 1024 so we'll need to find more tricks to reduce
the space.  There are 2 holes, one is 4 bytes (after i_otime_nsec) so
there's still some potential.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-09 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08 12:17 [PATCH 0/8] btrfs: inode management and memory consumption improvements fdmanana
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/8] btrfs: use an xarray to track open inodes in a root fdmanana
2024-05-09  0:18   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: preallocate inodes xarray entry to avoid transaction abort fdmanana
2024-05-09  0:21   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/8] btrfs: reduce nesting and deduplicate error handling at btrfs_iget_path() fdmanana
2024-05-09  0:23   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 4/8] btrfs: remove inode_lock from struct btrfs_root and use xarray locks fdmanana
2024-05-09  0:25   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-09  8:38     ` Filipe Manana
2024-05-09  8:42       ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: unify index_cnt and csum_bytes from struct btrfs_inode fdmanana
2024-05-09  0:30   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-09  8:39     ` Filipe Manana
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: don't allocate file extent tree for non regular files fdmanana
2024-05-09  0:39   ` Qu Wenruo
2024-05-09  8:41     ` Filipe Manana
2024-05-13 18:39       ` David Sterba
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: remove location key from struct btrfs_inode fdmanana
2024-05-08 12:17 ` [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: remove objectid from struct btrfs_inode on 64 bits platforms fdmanana
2024-05-09 17:56 ` David Sterba [this message]
2024-05-10 11:04   ` [PATCH 0/8] btrfs: inode management and memory consumption improvements Filipe Manana
2024-05-10 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] " fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] btrfs: use an xarray to track open inodes in a root fdmanana
2024-05-14 15:49     ` David Sterba
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] btrfs: preallocate inodes xarray entry to avoid transaction abort fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 03/10] btrfs: reduce nesting and deduplicate error handling at btrfs_iget_path() fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] btrfs: remove inode_lock from struct btrfs_root and use xarray locks fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 05/10] btrfs: unify index_cnt and csum_bytes from struct btrfs_inode fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 06/10] btrfs: don't allocate file extent tree for non regular files fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 07/10] btrfs: remove location key from struct btrfs_inode fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 08/10] btrfs: remove objectid from struct btrfs_inode on 64 bits platforms fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 09/10] btrfs: rename rb_root member of extent_map_tree from map to root fdmanana
2024-05-10 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 10/10] btrfs: use a regular rb_root instead of cached rb_root for extent_map_tree fdmanana
2024-05-14 15:58     ` David Sterba
2024-05-14 16:08   ` [PATCH v2 00/10] btrfs: inode management and memory consumption improvements David Sterba
2024-05-15 18:28   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240509175633.GO13977@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).