linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: fdmanana@kernel.org
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: update writeback index when starting defrag
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 17:41:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20aad8ccf0fbdecddd49216f25fa772754f77978.1642700395.git.fdmanana@suse.com> (raw)

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

When starting a defrag, we should update the writeback index of the
inode's mapping in case it currently has a value beyond the start of the
range we are defragging. This can help performance and often result in
getting less extents after writeback - for e.g., if the current value
of the writeback index sits somewhere in the middle of a range that
gets dirty by the defrag, then after writeback we can get two smaller
extents instead of a single, larger extent.

We used to have this before the refactoring in 5.16, but it was removed
without any reason to do so. Orginally it was added in kernel 3.1, by
commit 2a0f7f5769992b ("Btrfs: fix recursive auto-defrag"), in order to
fix a loop with autodefrag resulting in dirtying and writing pages over
and over, but some testing on current code did not show that happening,
at least with the test described in that commit.

So add back the behaviour, as at the very least it is a nice to have
optimization.

Fixes: 7b508037d4cac3 ("btrfs: defrag: use defrag_one_cluster() to implement btrfs_defrag_file()")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index bfe5ed65e92b..95d0e210f063 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -1535,6 +1535,7 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_ra_state *ra,
 	int compress_type = BTRFS_COMPRESS_ZLIB;
 	int ret = 0;
 	u32 extent_thresh = range->extent_thresh;
+	pgoff_t start_index;
 
 	if (isize == 0)
 		return 0;
@@ -1576,6 +1577,14 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_ra_state *ra,
 			file_ra_state_init(ra, inode->i_mapping);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Make writeback start from the beginning of the range, so that the
+	 * defrag range can be written sequentially.
+	 */
+	start_index = cur >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	if (start_index < inode->i_mapping->writeback_index)
+		inode->i_mapping->writeback_index = start_index;
+
 	while (cur < last_byte) {
 		const unsigned long prev_sectors_defragged = sectors_defragged;
 		u64 cluster_end;
-- 
2.33.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-20 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-20 17:41 fdmanana [this message]
2022-01-21  0:03 ` [PATCH] btrfs: update writeback index when starting defrag Qu Wenruo
2022-01-21 10:18   ` Filipe Manana
2022-01-24 17:09 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20aad8ccf0fbdecddd49216f25fa772754f77978.1642700395.git.fdmanana@suse.com \
    --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).