From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8244CC282CC for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C232175B for ; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 17:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="mPDDPXfL" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727320AbfBERkt (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:40:49 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:49636 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727441AbfBERks (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2019 12:40:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ZHgX6S6qitlSMvB4nbnOD/KOedjMr+Z/UNhlFWQV/FM=; b=mPDDPXfLuDKaJBOOZ7icmTW/GW ZUTfMQMLRvzNXMNj8AmASxH/G4dAnsqZZH9sJqRpw6flP3LnEfRimfQfJ8H4GxIGmqfMObZPylx7S Sp9inmirLZW4iMLNqagXHtW1G5qBbpSl3UMAeMgnRKdHdTKoULhW5bHo9D7u4ABS2dBVt3HXHqrnk 7DqKnSw6lyl7a08f7BWIOIW2TQeU/Q1X6I4r8na/QaprovLNqgdF5YPohQQJQ15Np6gFVbKu/aUrt fDgPMZ+Cp6Us5o1HA/OgSEYofAWjFhISjDSnZhl4tVg8bco2rL5GMzLZ6PkqfPcnIIu2vavrCuMlp jdLIGhRg==; Received: from static-50-53-52-16.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net ([50.53.52.16] helo=midway.dunlab) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gr4iE-0005eO-Em; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 17:40:46 +0000 Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 5 (btrfs/zstd) To: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Btrfs References: <20190205171228.41a9f771@canb.auug.org.au> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <26ce21e5-0e3c-d847-c895-6cb166507441@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 09:40:40 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190205171228.41a9f771@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 2/4/19 10:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20190204: > on i386: ../fs/btrfs/zstd.c: In function ‘zstd_reclaim_timer_fn’: ../fs/btrfs/zstd.c:27:35: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow] #define ZSTD_BTRFS_RECLAIM_NS (45 * NSEC_PER_SEC) ^ ../fs/btrfs/zstd.c:96:33: note: in expansion of macro ‘ZSTD_BTRFS_RECLAIM_NS’ if (now < victim->last_used + ZSTD_BTRFS_RECLAIM_NS) ^ -- ~Randy