From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2DCC282C4 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDB82087C for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728978AbfBDMwv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 07:52:51 -0500 Received: from rigel.uberspace.de ([95.143.172.238]:51418 "EHLO rigel.uberspace.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726835AbfBDMwv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 07:52:51 -0500 Received: (qmail 11142 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2019 12:52:48 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO webmail.rigel.uberspace.de) (127.0.0.1) by ::1 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2019 12:52:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 13:52:48 +0100 From: Moritz M To: Qu Wenruo Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Help needed, server is unresponsive after btrfs balance In-Reply-To: <4ecaf7ef-49cb-d7f6-3535-941e44e2f469@gmx.com> References: <6c9257eb3b6451b67bd8b082e06a7735@moritzmueller.ee> <4ecaf7ef-49cb-d7f6-3535-941e44e2f469@gmx.com> Message-ID: <36591d6b6e7c9875e512fddbc78139d3@moritzmueller.ee> X-Sender: mailinglist@moritzmueller.ee Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org > > You're using qgroups, it's known to cause huge performance overhead for > balance. > > We have upcoming patches to solve it, but it not going to mainline > before v5.1 kernel. > > So please disable qgroups if you're not using it actively. > Thanks, was not aware that I turned it on. Is btrfs quota disable / enough for disabling qgroups?