From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:05:46 -0800
Message-ID: <4966DB2A.6030708@zytor.com>
References: <1231365115.11687.361.camel@twins>	 <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901071355350.3057@localhost.localdomain>	 <1231366716.11687.377.camel@twins>	 <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901071509160.3057@localhost.localdomain>	 <1231408718.11687.400.camel@twins> <20090108141808.GC11629@elte.hu>	 <1231426014.11687.456.camel@twins>	 <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901080849550.3283@localhost.localdomain>	 <1231434515.14304.27.camel@think.oraclecorp.com>	 <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901080955400.3283@localhost.localdomain>	 <20090108183306.GA22916@elte.hu> <1231444786.5715.8.camel@brick>	 <4966ABF9.9080409@zytor.com> <1231467896.5715.40.camel@brick>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Peter Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>,
	Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@novell.com>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1231467896.5715.40.camel@brick>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Harvey Harrison wrote:
> 
> A lot of code was written assuming inline means __always_inline, I'd suggest
> keeping that assumption and working on removing inlines that aren't
> strictly necessary as there's no way to know what inlines meant 'try to inline'
> and what ones really should have been __always_inline.
> 
> Not that I feel _that_ strongly about it.
> 

Actually, we have that reasonably well down by now.  There seems to be a
couple of minor tweaking still necessary, but I think we're 90-95% there
already.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.