From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49261 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751548AbaEVCOK (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 22:14:10 -0400 Message-ID: <537D5D6F.900@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:14:07 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anand Jain , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org CC: rm@romanrm.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] btrfs: label should not contain return char References: <1400519071-5580-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <1400567808-9494-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com> <537B83AD.5010901@redhat.com> <537D5B55.1010207@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <537D5B55.1010207@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 5/21/14, 9:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote: > >> >> (Random aside: why does btrfs support online fs relabeling, anyway?) >> >> -Eric > > Online you mean when mounted ? Yep - I'm just not sure who would ever want to do that. Aren't labels primarly used for mounting, during the mount process? So changing it while mounted seems like a feature looking for a usecase... -Eric