linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu WenRuo <wqu@suse.com>
To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Introduce per-profile available space array to avoid over-confident can_overcommit()
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:19:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55af2fa3-0762-3893-90b4-e0b90a225d27@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116060404.95200-1-wqu@suse.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5882 bytes --]

Hi David,

Mind to merge the patchset for misc-next?

As patches 1~4 are reviewed, and the last patch is not that complex to
grasp, I guess it's time to finish the long existing df 0 space bug,
with better RAID5/6 estimation for df.


For the long discussion about whether we should set available space back
to 0 when metadata is exhausting, I still tend not to do so, since
metadata and data are separate resources.

Thanks,
Qu

On 2020/1/16 下午2:03, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> There are several bug reports of ENOSPC error in
> btrfs_run_delalloc_range().
> 
> With some extra info from one reporter, it turns out that
> can_overcommit() is using a wrong way to calculate allocatable metadata
> space.
> 
> The most typical case would look like:
>   devid 1 unallocated:	1G
>   devid 2 unallocated:  10G
>   metadata profile:	RAID1
> 
> In above case, we can at most allocate 1G chunk for metadata, due to
> unbalanced disk free space.
> But current can_overcommit() uses factor based calculation, which never
> consider the disk free space balance.
> 
> 
> To address this problem, here comes the per-profile available space
> array, which gets updated every time a chunk get allocated/removed or a
> device get grown or shrunk.
> 
> This provides a quick way for hotter place like can_overcommit() to grab
> an estimation on how many bytes it can over-commit.
> 
> The per-profile available space calculation tries to keep the behavior
> of chunk allocator, thus it can handle uneven disks pretty well.
> 
> And statfs() can also grab that pre-calculated value for instance usage.
> For metadata over-commit, statfs() falls back to factor based educated
> guess method.
> Since over-commit can only happen when we have unallocated space, the
> problem caused by over-commit should only be a first world problem.
> 
> Since this patch introduced a new failure pattern, some new error
> handling are introduced:
> - __btrfs_alloc_chunk()
>   At the end of that function where calc_per_profile_avail() get called,
>   if it failed due to -ENOMEM, we will revert device used space, and
>   remove the allocated chunk.
>   This is the only new error handling added by patch 5.
> 
> - btrfs_remove_chunk()
>   There is no good way to revert the change. So here we abort
>   transaction, just like what the old error handling does.
> 
> - btrfs_grow_device()
>   This function has its problem by not reverting device used space from
>   the very beginning.
>   This patchset will enhance it in patch 4.
> 
> - btrfs_shrink_device()
>   This function already has good error handling, reuse it.
> 
> - btrfs_verify_dev_extents()
>   Mount time error will lead to mount failure, nothing to worry about.
> 
> Contents of the patchset:
> Patch 1:	Core facility, with basic (not perfect) error handling
> Patch 2:	Fix for over-confident can_overcommit()
> Patch 3:	Make statfs() more accurate
> Patch 4:	Better error handling for btrfs_grow_device()
> Patch 5:	Better error handling for __btrfs_alloc_chunk()
> 
> If needed, patch 4 and patch 5 can be merged into patch 1.
> 
> Changelog:
> v1:
> - Fix a bug where we forgot to update per-profile array after allocating
>   a chunk.
>   To avoid ABBA deadlock, this introduce a small windows at the end
>   __btrfs_alloc_chunk(), it's not elegant but should be good enough
>   before we rework chunk and device list mutex.
>   
> - Make statfs() to use virtual chunk allocator to do better estimation
>   Now statfs() can report not only more accurate result, but can also
>   handle RAID5/6 better.
> 
> v2:
> - Fix a deadlock caused by acquiring device_list_mutex under
>   __btrfs_alloc_chunk()
>   There is no need to acquire device_list_mutex when holding
>   chunk_mutex.
>   Fix it and remove the lockdep assert.
> 
> v3:
> - Use proper chunk_mutex instead of device_list_mutex
>   Since they are protecting two different things, and we only care about
>   alloc_list, we should only use chunk_mutex.
>   With improved lock situation, it's easier to fold
>   calc_per_profile_available() calls into the first patch.
> 
> - Add performance benchmark for statfs() modification
>   As Facebook seems to run into some problems with statfs() calls, add
>   some basic ftrace results.
> 
> v4:
> - Keep the lock-free design for statfs()
>   As extra sleeping in statfs() may not be a good idea, keep the old
>   lock-free design, and use factor based calculation as fall back.
> 
> v5:
> - Enhance btrfs_update_device() error handling in btrfs_grow_device()
> - Ensure all failure caused by calc_per_profile_available() is the same
>   with existing error handling
> - Fix a bug where chunk_mutex is not released in btrfs_shrink_device()
> 
> v6:
> - Don't update the array if we hit any error.
>   To avoid calling calc_per_profile_avail() in error handling path.
> 
> - Re-order the patchset
>   Make the core facility the first patch.
>   Error handling improvement in later patches.
> 
> - Add better error handling
>   Improve one existing bad error handling, and provide a better solution
>   for __btrfs_alloc_chunk()
> 
> Qu Wenruo (5):
>   btrfs: Introduce per-profile available space facility
>   btrfs: space-info: Use per-profile available space in can_overcommit()
>   btrfs: statfs: Use pre-calculated per-profile available space
>   btrfs: Reset device size when btrfs_update_device() failed in
>     btrfs_grow_device()
>   btrfs: volumes: Revert device used bytes when calc_per_profile_avail()
>     failed
> 
>  fs/btrfs/space-info.c |  15 ++-
>  fs/btrfs/super.c      | 182 +++++++++----------------------
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c    | 245 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.h    |  11 ++
>  4 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-)
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-29  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16  6:03 [PATCH v6 0/4] Introduce per-profile available space array to avoid over-confident can_overcommit() Qu Wenruo
2020-01-16  6:04 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] btrfs: Introduce per-profile available space facility Qu Wenruo
2020-01-16 16:14   ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-17  0:55     ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-17  1:50       ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-17  1:54         ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-17  2:00           ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-16  6:04 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] btrfs: space-info: Use per-profile available space in can_overcommit() Qu Wenruo
2020-01-16  6:04 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] btrfs: statfs: Use pre-calculated per-profile available space Qu Wenruo
2020-01-16 16:21   ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-16  6:04 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] btrfs: Reset device size when btrfs_update_device() failed in btrfs_grow_device() Qu Wenruo
2020-01-16  6:04 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] btrfs: volumes: Revert device used bytes when calc_per_profile_avail() failed Qu Wenruo
2020-01-29  5:19 ` Qu WenRuo [this message]
2020-01-29  9:23   ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Introduce per-profile available space array to avoid over-confident can_overcommit() Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-29 10:51     ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55af2fa3-0762-3893-90b4-e0b90a225d27@suse.com \
    --to=wqu@suse.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).