On 2019/1/23 上午12:32, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 04:16:00PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> And to co-operate this, also delayed btrfs_drop_snapshot() call on reloc
>> tree, btrfs_drop_snapshot() call will also be delayed to
>> clean_dirty_subvs().
> 
> Can you please rephrase this paragraph?
> 
>> This patch will increase the size of btrfs_root by 16 bytes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> 
>> +static int clean_dirty_subvs(struct reloc_control *rc)
>> +{
>> +	struct btrfs_root *root;
>> +	struct btrfs_root *next;
>> +	int err = 0;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(root, next, &rc->dirty_subv_roots,
>> +				 reloc_dirty_list) {
>> +		struct btrfs_root *reloc_root = root->reloc_root;
>> +
>> +		clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state);
>> +		list_del_init(&root->reloc_dirty_list);
>> +		root->reloc_root = NULL;
>> +		if (reloc_root) {
>> +			ret = btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root, NULL, 0, 1);
>> +			if (ret < 0 && !err)
>> +				err = ret;
>> +		}
>> +		btrfs_put_fs_root(root);
>> +	}
>> +	return err;
> 
> Please dont use the err/ret style but 'ret' that matches function return
> type and for the temporary return values ret2 etc.

For this policy, the primary objective is to avoid the confusion between
err and ret, right?

Then I'd prefer tmp_ret over ret2, although it's just a personal taste.

Thanks,
Qu

> 
>> +}