From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC7AC07E85 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 09:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FFF2081C for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 09:28:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 20FFF2081C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=duckstad.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726114AbeLIJ2R (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 04:28:17 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.caiw.net ([62.45.45.125]:47483 "EHLO smtp-out1.caiw.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726079AbeLIJ2R (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Dec 2018 04:28:17 -0500 Received: from barracuda-out-2.caiw.net (barracuda-out.caiw.net [62.45.59.18]) by smtp-out1.caiw.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035B140830 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:14 +0100 (CET) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1544347693-08d4fd46b282490001-6jHSXT Received: from smtp-out1.caiw.net (smtp-out1.caiw.net [62.45.45.125]) by barracuda-out-2.caiw.net with ESMTP id wmlgdhKoYy0x6bh4; Sun, 09 Dec 2018 10:28:13 +0100 (CET) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bolderbast@duckstad.net X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 62.45.45.125 Received: from katrien.duckstad.net (200-228-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl [62.45.228.200]) by smtp-out1.caiw.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742DAE0085; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by katrien.duckstad.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676413802F; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:13 +0100 (CET) X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 62.45.228.200 X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: 200-228-045-062.dynamic.caiway.nl[62.45.228.200] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 62.45.228.200 Received: from katrien.duckstad.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (katrien.duckstad.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id smHSabtV3dy7; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by katrien.duckstad.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC75A38030; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at katrien.duckstad.net Received: from katrien.duckstad.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (katrien.duckstad.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 1V01Bd-185rr; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from bolderbast (unknown [10.4.2.1]) by katrien.duckstad.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A203D3802F; Sun, 9 Dec 2018 10:28:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <77c6f2ac98a3c89ace6829dd3b5b821533c48621.camel@duckstad.net> Subject: Re: Need help with potential ~45TB dataloss From: Patrick Dijkgraaf X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Need help with potential ~45TB dataloss To: Chris Murphy , Btrfs BTRFS Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2018 10:28:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <8bc37755da04dffae1a34cea2a06bcffdf2c75d7.camel@duckstad.net> <6ce9cd01-960f-af3d-0273-0b9abfa1d4f8@gmx.com> <2b235519-5c8d-9e86-b4f3-28cd7f778c4f@gmail.com> <7dac5577-2231-dcba-39fd-c229e4ed5e02@gmx.com> <8e5729f3c15997a13bdce73800146e91222ed89c.camel@duckstad.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-out1.caiw.net[62.45.45.125] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1544347693 X-Barracuda-URL: https://62.45.59.18:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at caiw.net X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 767 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0012 1.0000 -2.0132 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.01 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.01 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=7.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.63401 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Chris, they're SATA. smartctl -x gives: SCT Error Recovery Control command not supported So seems like we can't do enything with it. -- Groet / Cheers, Patrick Dijkgraaf On Tue, 2018-12-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:09 AM Patrick Dijkgraaf > < > bolderbast@duckstad.net > > wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > See the output below. Any suggestions based on it? > > If they're SATA drives, they may not support SCT ERC; and if they're > SAS, depending on what controller they're behind, smartctl might need > a hint to properly ask the drive for SCT ERC status. Simplest way to > know is do 'smartctl -x' on one drive, assuming they're all the same > basic make/model other than size. > >