From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
To: Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: cpu bound I/O behaviour in linux 5.4 (possibly others)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:57:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a472107-ab87-d787-9f4f-d0d0e148061a@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214113027.GA6855@schmorp.de>
On 14.02.20 г. 13:30 ч., Marc Lehmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've upgraded a machine to linux 5.4.15 that runs a small netnews
> system. It normally pulls news with about 20MB/s. After upgrading (it
> seems) that this process is now CPU bound, and I get only about 10mb/s
> throughput. Otherwise, everything seems fine - no obvious bugs, and no
> obvious performance problems.
>
> "CPU-bound" specifically means that the disk(s) seem pretty idle (it an
> 6x10TB raid5), I can do a lot of I/O without slowing down the transfer,
> but there is always a single kworker which is constantly at 100% cpu (i.e.
> one core) in top:
So this is a 50tb useful space, right?
>
> 8963 root 20 0 0 0 0 R 2 100.0 0.0 2:04 [kworker/u8:15+flush-btrfs-3]
>
> When I cat /proc/8963/task/8963/stack regularly, I get either no output or
> (most often) this single line:
>
> [<0>] tree_search_offset.isra.0+0x16a/0x1d0 [btrfs]
This points to freespace cache. One thing that I might suggest is try
using free-space-tree (aka free space cache v2 ) as opposed to v1. You
can achieve this with the space_cache=2 mount option. I suspect what
might be happening is the freespace cache is rather fragmented and the
rb tree which is really pointer chasing is having a hard time keeping
up. space cache v2 is a lot better in that regard, since it's a btree as
its backing data structure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 11:30 cpu bound I/O behaviour in linux 5.4 (possibly others) Marc Lehmann
2020-02-14 11:57 ` Nikolay Borisov [this message]
2020-02-14 12:20 ` Filipe Manana
2020-02-14 20:07 ` Marc Lehmann
2020-02-14 12:40 ` Marc Lehmann
2020-02-14 12:36 ` Roman Mamedov
2020-02-14 12:45 ` Marc Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a472107-ab87-d787-9f4f-d0d0e148061a@suse.com \
--to=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schmorp@schmorp.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).