From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF34C432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C59A60231 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343748AbhIAPfs (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:35:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44512 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343746AbhIAPfr (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 11:35:47 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BF4C061575 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id s10so7185499lfr.11 for ; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:34:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vrg8aqHkw1KISY9lPYCUpjyiMtgkqHx6nEqcxYGDCUw=; b=nQDUTx+J6thberegnbAQDX6AzVJstCsV2A+JmPmqa3039XuCHgQ2GG88eh0DyyBgnl nrroegCQgKC3TvOK1t4t/G1MB17JSD++/3hGFHdlwPnWfck6/rmfYkLEFl/pH5avZbm/ 7IKPh11Y2U2uO/bgarf3FaiAFgvDbVYYaA8S1HzVY0JSBDU2REU1XP5f5RzO44uajujF XkaR7AIzU8AbLfcIXnNL1fPuInr3oSAS2ugJ4He6zcjEv3lkkjGgrjsIdszghWZvNp+m 97KgYv8UP7X4bsTDGVV8gfmBsNR5vjpJvYRszRitrHh16ZMndieioktn6Gdn2e3efIhY v5Ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vrg8aqHkw1KISY9lPYCUpjyiMtgkqHx6nEqcxYGDCUw=; b=dwORIiBhoduerFRUcD34MCA8EfhIAUqR4xZyaysuxQZHQ4Pk3CrpAomfb4vByPohlH 5XbCAHTeIoX/PieFfuK0ziHrfeGANixS3ag6AXd/Jm+kbP4jbKSqAuTBruHRWrN6XJ5q gJAqQy8KWp0CkCAZnvw4IN1eCrxpH4Z05O66W5EaupqIkp4X4QZvNQpqe/DB2YF5y6Sc HDctpJ16HiPNQYeJOkY5Ku/D6VpuC7K8zx2zfyC6ypt08xGyOEeq7cRQe/aJrt79VAo9 i9/e3PdCUdvaIT/VdKSvkOvnjSl1tzmt1SwHsJwevIMFzOaRuos8p8vfBFyDtuOwDiJW vUCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JDDp0iGQpKk0GeDYa7wo0pPHeQ+hi8hPHunis0yx5u7ri+DFn ys3IM9Xc1JKYJHAzsKFa4GVJcZOrZzQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKIk3LqGon+kLMXVKf20RsCsuUjsMxLhGdxsu1MfVVHQt3Tbd59IL42SJ+LSVvdwVZ/fCaBA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:530d:: with SMTP id c13mr26260145lfh.445.1630510488531; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a00:1370:812d:8deb:5c9c:cef9:590c:9452? ([2a00:1370:812d:8deb:5c9c:cef9:590c:9452]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v14sm3315lji.32.2021.09.01.08.34.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Backup failing with "failed to clone extents" error To: fdmanana@gmail.com, Darrell Enns Cc: linux-btrfs References: From: Andrei Borzenkov Message-ID: <7a858635-2491-cccd-0a29-d1a1d0c9d313@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:34:47 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On 01.09.2021 17:50, Filipe Manana wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:48 PM Darrell Enns wrote: >> >> It's btrfs-progs v5.13.1. Debug logs are attached. > > Ok, now I see what's going on. > > Somehow you have at least two snapshots (with IDs 881 and 977 on the > send filesystem), that have the same 'received_uuid' - > e346e5a1-536c-8d42-ba33-c5452dec7888. > So these snapshots were received from some other filesystem in the past. > Is there any reason "btrfs receive" does not show actual id of subvolume used as clone source in its log messages?