linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.de>
To: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] btrfs-progs: image: Fix a access-beyond-boundary bug when there are 32 online CPUs
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 09:28:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bb6a6e4-6d2b-d4d9-ebb6-b47f309d99ce@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d6909877-43e9-b66d-6d77-cf58820e64a9@gmx.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2343 bytes --]



On 2019/6/10 上午9:23, Su Yue wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019/6/6 7:06 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> [BUG]
>> When there are over 32 (in my example, 35) online CPUs, btrfs-image -c9
>> will just hang.
>>
>> [CAUSE]
>> Btrfs-image has a hard coded limit (32) on how many threads we can use.
>> For the "-t" option we do the up limit check.
>>
>> But when we don't specify "-t" option and speicified "-c" option, then
>> btrfs-image will try to auto detect the number of online CPUs, and use
>> it without checking if it's over the up limit.
>>
>> And for num_threads larger than the up limit, we will over write the
>> adjust members of metadump_struct/mdrestore_struct, corrupting
>> pthread_mutex_t and pthread_cond_t, causing synchronising problem.
>>
>> Nowadays, with SMT/HT and higher cpu core counts, it's not hard to go
>> beyond 32 threads, and hit the bug.
>>
>> [FIX]
>> Just do extra num_threads check before using the number from sysconf().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> 
> This does fix an issue.
> And as the commit says, why limit the max threads to 32?

That's completely due to the hard coded metadump_struct.
We can switch to dynamically allocated pthread_t. Shouldn't be that hard
to convert.

> Does it still make sense in nowadays multiple cores CPU?

Well, thanks to the slow improvement caused by monopoly (cough, cough,
Intel), after one decade we're finally getting mainstream
16core/32threads CPUs in this year.

Personally speaking 32 threads should be already good enough for such a
less-common used tools.

So I'd prefer to keep the hard-coded limit for a while.

Thanks,
Qu

> Can we increase the limit?
> However, this is another story.
> 
> For this patch:
> Reviewed-by: Su Yue <Damenly_Su@gmx.com>
> 
>> ---
>>   image/main.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/image/main.c b/image/main.c
>> index fb9fc48c..80f09c21 100644
>> --- a/image/main.c
>> +++ b/image/main.c
>> @@ -2758,6 +2758,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>>
>>               if (tmp <= 0)
>>                   tmp = 1;
>> +            tmp = min_t(long, tmp, MAX_WORKER_THREADS);
>>               num_threads = tmp;
>>           }
>>       } else {
>>
> 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-10  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-06 11:06 [PATCH 0/9] btrfs-progs: image: Data dump support, restore optimization and small fixes Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 1/9] btrfs-progs: image: Use SZ_* to replace intermediate size Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 2/9] btrfs-progs: image: Fix a indent misalign Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 3/9] btrfs-progs: image: Fix a access-beyond-boundary bug when there are 32 online CPUs Qu Wenruo
2019-06-10  1:23   ` Su Yue
2019-06-10  1:28     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 4/9] btrfs-progs: image: Verify the superblock before restore Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 5/9] btrfs-progs: image: Introduce framework for more dump versions Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 6/9] btrfs-progs: image: Introduce -d option to dump data Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 7/9] btrfs-progs: image: Allow restore to record system chunk ranges for later usage Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 8/9] btrfs-progs: image: Introduce helper to determine if a tree block is in the range of system chunks Qu Wenruo
2019-06-06 11:06 ` [PATCH 9/9] btrfs-progs: image: Rework how we search chunk tree blocks Qu Wenruo
2019-06-14 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/9] btrfs-progs: image: Data dump support, restore optimization and small fixes David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7bb6a6e4-6d2b-d4d9-ebb6-b47f309d99ce@suse.de \
    --to=wqu@suse.de \
    --cc=Damenly_Su@gmx.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).