linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Atemu <atemu.main@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: btrfs send: Kernel's memory usage rises until OOM kernel panic after sending ~37GiB
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2019 21:43:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <944da320-f5ff-9290-27a1-e39aed7d6d21@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE4GHg=-K3JdhvQpTC8fPGBm1sVLDOUW+UkBCSZJwz27fkW90A@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2403 bytes --]



On 2019/10/27 下午8:55, Atemu wrote:
>> This depends on how shared one file extent is.
> 
> But shouldn't it catch that and cancel the btrfs send before it panics
> the kernel due to its memory usage?

Backref walk is quite tricky in btrfs, we don't really have a good way
to detect whether it's a good idea or not, until we crash...

But at least, we have some plan to fix it, hopefully sooner than later.

> 
>> If one file extent is shared 10,000 times for one subvolume, and you
>> have 1000 snapshots of that subvolume, it will really go crazy.
> 
>> But as I mentioned, snapshot is another catalyst for such problem.
> 
> I only have two snapshots of the subvolume but some the extents might
> very well be shared many many times.
> 
>> I can't say for 100% sure. We need more info on that.
> 
> Sure.
> 
>> That's trim (or discard), not hole punching.
> 
> I didn't mean discarding the btrfs to the underlying storage, I meant
> mounting the filesystems in the image files sitting inside the btrfs
> through a loop device and running fstrim on them.
> The loop device should punch holes into the underlying image files
> when it receives a discard, right?

That's correctly, that will punch holes for *unused* space.
But still, all 0 extents are still considered used, thus won't really work.

Since deduperemover has already skipped all 0 extents, it should be a
big problem I guess?

Thanks,
Qu
> 
>> Normally hole punching is done by ioctl fpunch(). Not sure if dupremove
>> does that too.
> 
> Duperemove doesn't punch holes afaik it can only ignore the 0 pages
> and not dedup them.>
>> Extent tree dump can provide per-subvolume level view of how shared one
>> extent is.
> 
>> It's really hard to determine, you could try the following command to
>> determine:
>> # btrfs ins dump-tree -t extent --bfs /dev/nvme/btrfs |\
>>   grep "(.*_ITEM.*)" | awk '{print $4" "$5" "$6" size "$10}'
>>
>> Then which key is the most shown one and its size.
>>
>> If a key's objectid (the first value) shows up multiple times, it's a
>> kinda heavily shared extent.
>>
>> Then search that objectid in the full extent tree dump, to find out how
>> it's shared.
> 
> Thanks, I'll try that out when I can unmount the btrfs.
> 
>> You can see it's already complex...
> 
> That's not an issue, I'm fluent in bash ;)
> 
> - Atemu
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-27 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-26 17:46 BUG: btrfs send: Kernel's memory usage rises until OOM kernel panic after sending ~37GiB Atemu
2019-10-27  0:50 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-27 10:33   ` Atemu
2019-10-27 11:34     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-27 12:55       ` Atemu
2019-10-27 13:43         ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-10-27 15:19           ` Atemu
2019-10-27 15:19       ` Atemu
2019-10-27 23:16         ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-28 12:26           ` Atemu
2019-10-28 11:30         ` Filipe Manana
2019-10-28 12:36           ` Qu Wenruo
2019-10-28 12:43             ` Filipe Manana
2019-10-28 14:58               ` Martin Raiber
2019-10-28 12:44           ` Atemu
2019-10-28 13:01             ` Filipe Manana
2019-10-28 13:44               ` Atemu
2019-10-31 13:55                 ` Atemu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=944da320-f5ff-9290-27a1-e39aed7d6d21@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=atemu.main@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).