From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.cz, fdmanana@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: drop lockdep assert in close_fs_devices()
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 11:58:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94f69f0215f06ecf929c66249810c549e492071c.1632368499.git.anand.jain@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f7529acd33594df9b0b06f7011d8cd4d195fc29.1627419595.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>
btrfs/225, btrfs/164 reports warning due to a lockdep assertion failure:
[ 5343.002752] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 5343.002756] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 797246 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1165
close_fs_devices+0x200/0x220 [btrfs]
[ 5343.002933] Call Trace:
[ 5343.002938] btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x147/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[ 5343.002981] btrfs_ioctl+0x2dc2/0x3460 [btrfs]
[ 5343.003021] ? __do_sys_newstat+0x48/0x70
[ 5343.003028] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 5343.003034] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 5343.003037] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 5343.003042] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 5343.003045] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 5343.003048] RIP: 0033:0x7fe125a17d87
The patch [1] removed uuid_mutex in btrfs_rm_device(). So now there is no
uuid_mutex in the call chain leading to close_fs_devices() that has
lockdep_assert_held(uuid_mutex).
[1] [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: do not take the uuid_mutex in btrfs_rm_device
The lockdep_assert_held(uuid_mutex) in close_fs_devices() was added by the
commit 425c6ed6486f (btrfs: do not hold device_list_mutex when closing
devices) as it found that device_list_mutex in close_fs_devices() was
redundant.
In the current code the lockdep_assert_held(uuid_mutex) in close_fs_devices()
in incorrect, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
---
David,
Pls feel free to either roll this into the patch "[PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: do not
take the uuid_mutex in btrfs_rm_device" or merge it as an independent patch.
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 9fea27b9f9be..ac4a9f349932 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1162,8 +1162,6 @@ static void close_fs_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices)
{
struct btrfs_device *device, *tmp;
- lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex);
-
if (--fs_devices->opened > 0)
return;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 21:01 [PATCH v2 0/7] Josef Bacik
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] btrfs: do not call close_fs_devices in btrfs_rm_device Josef Bacik
2021-09-01 8:13 ` Anand Jain
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] btrfs: do not take the uuid_mutex " Josef Bacik
2021-09-01 12:01 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-01 17:08 ` David Sterba
2021-09-01 17:10 ` Josef Bacik
2021-09-01 19:49 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-02 12:58 ` David Sterba
2021-09-02 14:10 ` Josef Bacik
2021-09-17 14:33 ` David Sterba
2021-09-20 7:45 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-20 8:26 ` David Sterba
2021-09-20 9:41 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-23 4:33 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-21 11:59 ` Filipe Manana
2021-09-21 12:17 ` Filipe Manana
2021-09-22 15:33 ` Filipe Manana
2021-09-23 4:15 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-23 3:58 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2021-09-23 4:04 ` [PATCH] btrfs: drop lockdep assert in close_fs_devices() Anand Jain
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] btrfs: do not read super look for a device path Josef Bacik
2021-08-25 2:00 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-27 15:32 ` Josef Bacik
2021-09-28 11:50 ` Anand Jain
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing Josef Bacik
2021-08-25 0:35 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-02 12:16 ` David Sterba
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device remove Josef Bacik
2021-08-25 1:00 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-02 12:16 ` David Sterba
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] btrfs: unify common code for the v1 and v2 versions of " Josef Bacik
2021-08-25 1:19 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-01 14:05 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-07-27 21:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] btrfs: do not take the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices Josef Bacik
2021-08-24 22:08 ` Anand Jain
2021-09-01 13:35 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-09-02 12:59 ` David Sterba
2021-09-17 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94f69f0215f06ecf929c66249810c549e492071c.1632368499.git.anand.jain@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).