linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitri Nikulin <dnikulin@gmail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Btrfs: do aio_write instead of write
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:20:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikeSoXZYQF_SkWbgejM6b65LUvy6JH8Pavxo8Iz@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100601131922.GJ8980@think>

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> w=
rote:
>> Is it ok not to unlock_extent if !ordered?
>> I don't know if you fixed this in a later version but it stuck out t=
o me :)
>
> The construct is confusing. =C2=A0Ordered extents track things that w=
e have
> allocated on disk and need to write. =C2=A0New ones can't be created =
while we
> have the extent range locked. =C2=A0But we can't force old ones to di=
sk with
> the lock held.
>
> So, we lock then lookup and if we find nothing we can safely do our
> operation because no io is in progress. =C2=A0We unlock a little late=
r on, or
> at endio time.
>
> If we find an ordered extent we drop the lock and wait for that IO to
> finish, then loop again.

Ok, that's fair enough. Maybe it's worth commenting, I'm sure I'm not
the only one surprised.

Thanks,

--=20
Dmitri Nikulin

Centre for Synchrotron Science
Monash University
Victoria 3800, Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      reply	other threads:[~2010-06-01 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-21 17:03 [PATCH 1/6] fs: allow short direct-io reads to be completed via buffered IO Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] direct-io: add a hook for the fs to provide its own submit_bio function Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] direct-io: do not merge logically non-contiguous requests Josef Bacik
2010-05-22  1:47   ` Mike Fedyk
2010-05-22 14:02     ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] fs: kill blockdev_direct_IO_no_locking Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] Btrfs: add basic DIO read/write support Josef Bacik
2010-05-21 17:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] Btrfs: do aio_write instead of write Josef Bacik
2010-05-23  8:31   ` Shi Weihua
2010-05-23 23:59     ` Josef Bacik
2010-05-27  3:06   ` liubo
2010-05-27  3:13     ` liubo
2010-05-27 12:59     ` Chris Mason
2010-05-28  1:42       ` liubo
2010-05-30  9:33   ` Dmitri Nikulin
2010-06-01 13:19     ` Chris Mason
2010-06-01 23:20       ` Dmitri Nikulin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTikeSoXZYQF_SkWbgejM6b65LUvy6JH8Pavxo8Iz@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dnikulin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).