linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yan, Zheng " <yanzheng@21cn.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Jerome Ibanes <Jerome@ops.zillow.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	yanmin.zhang@intel.com, tim.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: btrfs: hanging processes - race condition?
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:32:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTilJCKyddGMIi77QG-uluyqgXPlPYVDcFTmWno8O@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100611011242.GA22585@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> wrot=
e:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:41:41AM +0800, Jerome Ibanes wrote:
>> List,
>>
>> I ran into a hang issue (race condition: cpu is high when the server=
 is
>> idle, meaning that btrfs is hanging, and IOwait is high as well) run=
ning
>> 2.6.34 on debian/lenny on a x86_64 server (dual Opteron 275 w/ 16GB =
ram).
>> The btrfs filesystem live on 18x300GB scsi spindles, configured as R=
aid-0,
>> as shown below:
>>
>> Label: none =A0uuid: bc6442c6-2fe2-4236-a5aa-6b7841234c52
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Total devices 18 FS bytes used 2.94TB
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A05 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c1d0
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 17 size 279.39GB used 208.34GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d8
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 16 size 279.39GB used 209.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d7
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A04 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c0d4
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A01 size 279.39GB used 233.72GB path /=
dev/cciss/c0d1
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 13 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d4
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A08 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c1d11
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 12 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d3
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A03 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c0d3
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A09 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c1d12
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A06 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c1d1
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 11 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d2
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 14 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d5
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A02 size 279.39GB used 233.70GB path /=
dev/cciss/c0d2
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 15 size 279.39GB used 209.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d6
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 10 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d13
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 =A07 size 279.39GB used 208.33GB path /=
dev/cciss/c1d10
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0devid =A0 18 size 279.39GB used 208.34GB path /de=
v/cciss/c1d9
>> Btrfs v0.19-16-g075587c-dirty
>>
>> The filesystem, mounted in /mnt/btrfs is hanging, no existing or new
>> process can access it, however 'df' still displays the disk usage (3=
TB out
>> of 5). The disks appear to be physically healthy. Please note that a
>> significant number of files were placed on this filesystem, between =
20 and
>> 30 million files.
>>
>> The relevant kernel messages are displayed below:
>>
>> INFO: task btrfs-submit-0:4220 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this mes=
sage.
>> btrfs-submit- D 000000010042e12f =A0 =A0 0 =A04220 =A0 =A0 =A02 0x00=
000000
>> =A0 ffff8803e584ac70 0000000000000046 0000000000004000 0000000000011=
680
>> =A0 ffff8803f7349fd8 ffff8803f7349fd8 ffff8803e584ac70 0000000000011=
680
>> =A0 0000000000000001 ffff8803ff99d250 ffffffff8149f020 0000000081150=
ab0
>> Call Trace:
>> =A0 [<ffffffff813089f3>] ? io_schedule+0x71/0xb1
>> =A0 [<ffffffff811470be>] ? get_request_wait+0xab/0x140
>> =A0 [<ffffffff810406f4>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81143a4d>] ? elv_rq_merge_ok+0x89/0x97
>> =A0 [<ffffffff8114a245>] ? blk_recount_segments+0x17/0x27
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81147429>] ? __make_request+0x2d6/0x3fc
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81145b16>] ? generic_make_request+0x207/0x268
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81145c12>] ? submit_bio+0x9b/0xa2
>> =A0 [<ffffffffa01aa081>] ? btrfs_requeue_work+0xd7/0xe1 [btrfs]
>> =A0 [<ffffffffa01a5365>] ? run_scheduled_bios+0x297/0x48f [btrfs]
>> =A0 [<ffffffffa01aa687>] ? worker_loop+0x17c/0x452 [btrfs]
>> =A0 [<ffffffffa01aa50b>] ? worker_loop+0x0/0x452 [btrfs]
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81040331>] ? kthread+0x79/0x81
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81003674>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> =A0 [<ffffffff810402b8>] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
>> =A0 [<ffffffff81003670>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
> This looks like the issue we saw too, http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/8/3=
75.
> This is reproduceable in our setup.

I think I know the cause of http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/8/375.
The code in the first do-while loop in btrfs_commit_transaction
set current process to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state, then calls
btrfs_start_delalloc_inodes, btrfs_wait_ordered_extents and
btrfs_run_ordered_operations(). All of these function may call
cond_resched().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-11  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-10 17:41 btrfs: hanging processes - race condition? Jerome Ibanes
2010-06-11  1:12 ` Shaohua Li
2010-06-11  2:32   ` Yan, Zheng  [this message]
2010-06-13  6:50     ` Shaohua Li
2010-06-14 13:28       ` Chris Mason
2010-06-14 18:12         ` Jerome Ibanes
2010-06-14 19:08           ` Chris Mason
2010-06-14 19:13             ` Jerome Ibanes
2010-06-16 18:12               ` Jerome Ibanes
2010-06-17  1:41         ` Shaohua Li
2010-06-18  0:57           ` Shaohua Li
2010-06-14 13:26     ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTilJCKyddGMIi77QG-uluyqgXPlPYVDcFTmWno8O@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yanzheng@21cn.com \
    --cc=Jerome@ops.zillow.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=yanmin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).