linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Brown <Justin.Brown@fandingo.org>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Access Beyond End of Device & Input/Output Errors
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 01:51:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKZK7uwRs_tf6htRtJvw3kNhyNPMJ-juA6_WSJo+PbQA7f40Cg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

I've run into a strange problem that I haven't seen before, and I need
some help. I started getting generic "input/output" errors on a couple
of files, and when I looked deeper, the kernel logs are full of
messages like:

    sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#29 access beyond end of device

I've never seen anything like this before with any FS, so I figured it
was worth asking before I consider running the standard btrfs tools.
(I briefly started a scrub, but it was going crazy with uncorrectable
errors, so I cancelled it.)

Here's my system info:

Fedora 32, kernel 5.7.7-200.fc32.x86_64
btrfs-progs v5.7

/etc/fstab entry:
LABEL=media /var/media btrfs subvol=media,discard 0 2

btrfs fi show /var/media/
Label: 'media' uuid: 51eef0c7-2977-4037-b271-3270ea22c7d9
Total devices 6 FS bytes used 4.68TiB
devid 1 size 1.82TiB used 963.00GiB path /dev/sdf1
devid 2 size 1.82TiB used 962.00GiB path /dev/sde1
devid 4 size 1.82TiB used 963.00GiB path /dev/sdg1
devid 6 size 1.82TiB used 962.03GiB path /dev/sda1
devid 7 size 7.28TiB used 967.03GiB path /dev/sdb1
devid 8 size 7.28TiB used 967.03GiB path /dev/sdd1

btrfs fi df /var/media/
Data, RAID5: total=4.69TiB, used=4.68TiB
System, RAID1C3: total=32.00MiB, used=304.00KiB
Metadata, RAID1C3: total=6.00GiB, used=4.94GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=0.00B

I can only mount -o degraded now. Here are the logs when mounting:

Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org sudo[275572]: justin : TTY=pts/0
; PWD=/home/justin ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/mount -t btrfs -o
degraded /dev/sda1 /var/media/
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#30
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: blk_update_request: I/O
error, dev sdf, sector 2176 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0 phys_seg 1 prio
class 0
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: Buffer I/O error on dev
sdf1, logical block 16, async page read
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS info (device
sde1): allowing degraded mounts
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS info (device
sde1): disk space caching is enabled
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): devid 1 uuid cb05aae6-6c03-49d3-b46d-bf51a0eb8cd0 is missing
Aug 01 01:15:26 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS info (device
sde1): bdev /dev/sdf1 errs: wr 4458026, rd 14571, flush 0, corrupt 0,
gen 0

It seems like only relatively recently written files are encountering
I/O errors. If I `cat` one of the problematic files when the FS is
mounted normally, I see a ton of this:

Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#26
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#27
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#28
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#29
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#30
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#0
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#1
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#13
access beyond end of device
Aug 01 01:13:49 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: sd 5:0:0:0: [sdf] tag#2
access beyond end of device

Now that I'm remounted in -o degraded, I'm getting more comprehensible
warnings, but it still results in I/O read failures:

Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99942400 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xbe3f80a4 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99946496 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0x9c36a6b4 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99950592 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0x44d30ca2 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99958784 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xc0f08acc mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99954688 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xcb11db59 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99962880 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0x8a4ee0aa mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99971072 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xdfb79e85 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99966976 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xc14921a0 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99975168 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xf2fe8774 mirror 2
Aug 01 01:31:53 spaceman.fandingo.org kernel: BTRFS warning (device
sde1): csum failed root 2820 ino 747435 off 99979264 csum 0x8941f998
expected csum 0xae1cafd6 mirror 2

Why trying to research this problem, I came across a Github issue
https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/282 and a patch from Qu
from yesterday ([PATCH] btrfs: trim: fix underflow in trim length to
prevent access beyond device boundary). I do use the discard mount
option, and I have a weekly fstrim.timer enabled. I did replace 2x2TB
drives with the 2x8TB drives about 1 month ago, which involved a
conversion to -d raid5 -m raid1c3, which I suppose could hit the same
code paths that resize2fs would?

Any advice on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Justin

             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-01  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-01  6:51 Justin Brown [this message]
2020-08-01  6:58 ` Access Beyond End of Device & Input/Output Errors Qu Wenruo
2020-08-01  7:02   ` Qu Wenruo
     [not found]     ` <CAKZK7uzmg19NDjGPPAxXKu7LJ-7ZdHu2cad22csj_chr2qxMJg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-08-01  9:31       ` Qu Wenruo
2020-08-01 11:56         ` Justin Brown
2020-08-01 23:30           ` Qu Wenruo
2020-09-06  1:42             ` Justin Brown
2021-01-17 23:38 chainofflowers
2021-01-18  0:11 ` Qu Wenruo
2021-01-18 21:07   ` chainofflowers
2021-01-21 23:55     ` chainofflowers
2021-01-22  0:49       ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-08 21:05         ` chainofflowers
2021-02-20 11:26           ` chainofflowers
2021-02-20 11:42             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-02-20 11:46           ` Forza
2021-02-20 12:07             ` chainofflowers
2021-02-20 12:13               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-04-23 23:36                 ` chainofflowers
2021-04-24  0:25                   ` Qu Wenruo
2021-04-24 14:13                     ` chainofflowers
2021-04-24 22:56                       ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKZK7uwRs_tf6htRtJvw3kNhyNPMJ-juA6_WSJo+PbQA7f40Cg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=justin.brown@fandingo.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).