Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>,
	Chen Rong <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
	Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild@lists.01.org,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
	kernel-team@fb.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/22] btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:39:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdnaiXo8qqK_tyiYvw5Fo4HvdFzrMxLU7k62qEWucC-58Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125185931.GA30548@dennisz-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:59 AM Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:27:43PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Hi Dennis,
> > Below is a 0day bot report from a build w/ Clang. Warning looks legit,
> > can you please take a look?
> >
>
> Ah thanks for this! Yeah that was a miss when I switched from flags ->
> an enum and didn't update the declaration properly. I'll be sending out
> a v4 as another fix for arm has some rebase conflicts.
>
> Is there a way to enable so I get these emails directly?

+ Rong, Philip

The reports have only been sent to our mailing list where we've been
manually triaging them.  The issue with enabling them globally was
that the script to reproduce the warning still doesn't mention how to
build w/ Clang.

In general the reports have been high value (I ignore most reports
with -Wimplicit-function-declaration, which is the most frequent as it
shows the patch was not compile tested at all).

Rong, Philip, it's been a while since we talked about this last. Is
there a general timeline of when these reports will be turned on
globally?  Even if the directions to reproduce aren't quite right,
generally there's enough info in the existing bugs where authors can
rewrite their patch without even needing to rebuild with Clang (though
having correct directions to reproduce would be nice, we could wait
until someone asked for them explicitly).

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

  reply index

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201911220351.HPI9gxNo%lkp@intel.com>
2019-11-22  4:27 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-11-25 18:59   ` Dennis Zhou
2019-11-25 19:39     ` Nick Desaulniers [this message]
2019-11-26  1:42       ` Philip Li
2019-11-26  1:47         ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-11-26  4:07           ` Philip Li
2019-11-26  4:09           ` Philip Li
2019-12-14  0:22 [PATCH v6 00/22] btrfs: async discard support Dennis Zhou
2019-12-14  0:22 ` [PATCH 05/22] btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue Dennis Zhou
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-09 19:45 [PATCH v5 00/22] btrfs: async discard support Dennis Zhou
2019-12-09 19:45 ` [PATCH 05/22] btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue Dennis Zhou
2019-11-25 19:46 [PATCH v4 00/22] btrfs: async discard support Dennis Zhou
2019-11-25 19:46 ` [PATCH 05/22] btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue Dennis Zhou
2019-11-20 21:50 [PATCH v3 00/22] btrfs: async discard support Dennis Zhou
2019-11-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 05/22] btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue Dennis Zhou
2019-10-23 22:52 [PATCH v2 00/22] btrfs: async discard support Dennis Zhou
2019-10-23 22:52 ` [PATCH 05/22] btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue Dennis Zhou
2019-11-11 18:49   ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKwvOdnaiXo8qqK_tyiYvw5Fo4HvdFzrMxLU7k62qEWucC-58Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kbuild@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=philip.li@intel.com \
    --cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-BTRFS Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0 linux-btrfs/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-btrfs linux-btrfs/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs \
		linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-btrfs

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-btrfs


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git