linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	fstests <fstests@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fstests: btrfs: Introduce stress test for deadlock between snapshot delete and other read-write operations
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:08:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H7gG4gLWaSHhLmxR-ngT-WBPXtx1=iziwcK4iquaQ6-xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190110061415.32045-2-wqu@suse.com>

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:15 AM Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Commit fb235dc06fac ("btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the qgroup accounting
> time out of commit trans") could cause ABBA deadlock between backref
> lookup with write lock hold (subvolume deletion) and other read/write
> operations.
>
> It's going to be fixed by "btrfs: qgroup: Don't trigger backref walk at
> delayed ref insert time".
>
> This test will generate pwrite background workload, along with
> constantly subvolume creation and deletion to trigger the bug.

constantly -> constant
>
> It needs some time to generate enough files to bump the tree height to
> trigger the bug.
> In my test environment, with 'unsafe' cache mode for the VM, it triggers
> the bug at around 70~90 seconds. So I leave the default runtime to 120s
> to make sure the bug will be triggered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/179     | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/179.out |   2 +
>  tests/btrfs/group   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/179
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/179.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/179 b/tests/btrfs/179
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..771d12fc49e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/179
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (C) 2019 SUSE Linux Products GmbH. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 179
> +#
> +# Test if btrfs will lockup at subvolume deletion.

Misses the most important part in the short description: "... when
qgroups are enabled."

> +#
> +# The bug is caused by commit fb235dc06fac ("btrfs: qgroup: Move half of the
> +# qgroup accounting time out of commit trans").
> +# Backref lookup with write lock hold (subvolue deletion) could cause ABBA lock
> +# with normal top-down tree locking sequence.

I would omit this. Relevant information on how and why the bug happens
is in the kernel patch, QA
people only need to know the test's purpose.

> +#
> +# This bug deadlock is going to be fixed by "btrfs: qgroup: Don't trigger

"This bug is going ... by a patch for the kernel titled ..."

> +# backref walk at delayed ref insert time" which reverts above commit.
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1       # failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +       cd /
> +       rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# real QA test starts here
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_supported_os Linux
> +_require_scratch
> +
> +# default sleep interval
> +sleep_time=1
> +
> +# stress test runtime
> +runtime=120
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs > /dev/null 2>&1
> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +mkdir -p "$SCRATCH_MNT/snapshots"
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume create "$SCRATCH_MNT/src" > /dev/null
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota enable "$SCRATCH_MNT" > /dev/null
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG quota rescan -w "$SCRATCH_MNT" > /dev/null
> +
> +fill_workload()
> +{
> +       local i=0
> +       while true; do
> +               _pwrite_byte 0xcd 0 8K "$SCRATCH_MNT/src/large_$i" > /dev/null
> +               _pwrite_byte 0xcd 0 2K "$SCRATCH_MNT/src/inline_$i" > /dev/null
> +
> +               # Randomly remove some files for every 5 loop
> +               if [ $(( $i % 5 )) -eq 0 ]; then
> +                       victim=$(ls "$SCRATCH_MNT/src" | sort -R | head -n1)
> +                       rm "$SCRATCH_MNT/src/$victim"
> +               fi
> +               i=$((i + 1))
> +       done
> +}
> +
> +snapshot_workload()
> +{
> +       local i=0
> +       while true; do
> +               sleep $sleep_time
> +               $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot "$SCRATCH_MNT/src" \
> +                       "$SCRATCH_MNT/snapshots/$i" > /dev/null
> +               i=$((i + 1))
> +       done
> +}
> +
> +delete_workload()
> +{
> +       while true; do
> +               sleep $((sleep_time * 2))
> +               victim=$(ls "$SCRATCH_MNT/snapshots" | sort -R | head -n1)
> +               $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume delete \
> +                       "$SCRATCH_MNT/snapshots/$victim" > /dev/null
> +       done
> +}
> +
> +fill_workload &
> +fill_pid=$!
> +
> +sleep $((sleep_time * 2))
> +snapshot_workload &
> +snapshot_pid=$!
> +delete_workload &
> +delete_pid=$!
> +
> +sleep $runtime
> +kill $fill_pid
> +wait $fill_pid
> +kill $snapshot_pid
> +wait $snapshot_pid
> +kill $delete_pid
> +wait $delete_pid
> +
> +# Workaround to handle killed workload with unreturned syscall
> +sync

I can't understand that comment, nor why the call to sync (probably
most readers won't either).
What do you mean by "unreturned syscall"? It hangs, blocked? Because
of the deadlock? How does the sync makes it "return"?

When you say killed workload, you mean though the kill commands above?
For all pids or just some in particular?

> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo "Silence is golden"
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/179.out b/tests/btrfs/179.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cb9eba3d34b1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/179.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 179
> +Silence is golden
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/group b/tests/btrfs/group
> index 04c0254aa4bf..46dd3c9523c2 100644
> --- a/tests/btrfs/group
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/group
> @@ -181,3 +181,4 @@
>  176 auto quick swap volume
>  177 auto quick swap balance
>  178 auto quick send
> +179 auto qgroup dangerous
> --
> 2.20.1
>


-- 
Filipe David Manana,

“Whether you think you can, or you think you can't — you're right.”

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-10 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-10  6:14 [PATCH 1/2] fstests: btrfs: Make seed device test cases into their own group Qu Wenruo
2019-01-10  6:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] fstests: btrfs: Introduce stress test for deadlock between snapshot delete and other read-write operations Qu Wenruo
2019-01-10 12:08   ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2019-01-10 13:49     ` Qu Wenruo
2019-01-10 13:53       ` Filipe Manana
2019-01-10 13:59         ` Qu Wenruo
2019-01-10  6:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] fstests: btrfs: Make seed device test cases into their own group Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL3q7H7gG4gLWaSHhLmxR-ngT-WBPXtx1=iziwcK4iquaQ6-xw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).