From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ED4C433DF for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FE2208B6 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 21:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="RqttxmYw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391113AbgF2V10 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 17:27:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729069AbgF2Smo (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 14:42:44 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc43.google.com (mail-oo1-xc43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9EBC031C46 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc43.google.com with SMTP id m38so21970ool.4 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:26:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IwHR1Sf+LTcrpq8mCmUJ74S3YkT8OmjO5FN6B1Z6CVI=; b=RqttxmYwLeSaH+0GvvrVokaNnLrTKSp/DSruaQuR/NCELfNkfLBY1vL4Wb1cbE10n/ kfXBxFYs5Xe6Tv0b2ao6vX/Ogq027dH7PrxzqrjNGCEGMapK/vDB5F5Qli5kzpig1FL6 Xmg73BfOo7oSDgtIDnTJnypa9HNJg/IQ7dC0U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IwHR1Sf+LTcrpq8mCmUJ74S3YkT8OmjO5FN6B1Z6CVI=; b=sNN+mGQn0Q9DKmDMghHaz11QSIdVczQlw8lMWx67RSANBKj7UhLOjLZjCfIWyyFgbV Mu5CI0mTWB4TyTVYvXu+CMpW2t2bBRyd/DdUb/nW/rNu95diSkStPU1ukC7ArVsq3KmO Zu2lW8nP8PF/kF1oHbPlJ6cbHDLmtc2qAmwyNEdeh5F+pAdEkbjEUQWH7/2fmT1jX4Hq IuRS3btsJlOhj65jDDSpphQ7aqYunWlAjCeEOlgNOEoeYwnAHjaiq2dUZk5P2U7hoVff 5EIyTUsipULT+MKb1+TM1gif35frvDythcbwWh2Ok9GkGAPS4+BQ2g6L9THT3xwFVQkv z6Eg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ELV7xNe2HATKTmK+c+eHR7DzmVCHoXfW+vta+xAoqI+f8kcja 3v2TO9cfDEjwPYDQcduGw1cwbSuVdwUJjLtI39+VVw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHy75/mbU/WBsuLKSzmxwRuut0qq+NAbMM1959xUc8/Ut6NpP4FouT81ZUYYPwR8FuXs6Gssp/LIZjoN2zxd0= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:c4c1:: with SMTP id g1mr14132172ooq.93.1593451571314; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:26:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200624160316.5001-1-marek.behun@nic.cz> <20200626133641.GX8432@bill-the-cat> In-Reply-To: <20200626133641.GX8432@bill-the-cat> From: Simon Glass Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:26:00 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH U-BOOT v3 00/30] PLEASE TEST fs: btrfs: Re-implement btrfs support using code from btrfs-progs To: Tom Rini Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWFyZWsgQmVow7pu?= , U-Boot Mailing List , =?UTF-8?Q?Alberto_S=C3=A1nchez_Molero?= , Marek Vasut , Pierre Bourdon , Yevgeny Popovych , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 07:36, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 07:43:20PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 10:03, Marek Beh=C3=BAn wro= te: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > this is a cleaned up version of Qu's patches that reimplements U-Boot= 's > > > btrfs driver with code from btrfs-progs. > > > > > > I have tested this series, found and corrected one bug (failure when > > > accesing files via symlinks), and it looks it is working now, but I > > > would like more people to do some testing. > > > > > > There are a lot of checkpatch warnings and errors left, I shall fix > > > this in the future. > > > > > > Marek > > > > Please can you add a test for this one? See fs-test.sh > > Not more fs-test.sh tests, test/py/tests/test_fs/ tests please, thanks! That's good news, I hadn't noticed the conversion from shell! Regards, Simon