From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Btrfs: fix file data corruptions due to lost dirty bits
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:01:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D8C57277-E51B-47C7-9371-66EF2B5623E9@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620193310.GG24375@twin.jikos.cz>
On 20 Jun 2018, at 15:33, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 07:56:10AM -0700, Chris Mason wrote:
>> We've been hunting the root cause of data crc errors here at FB for a
>> while.
>> We'd find one or two corrupted files, usually displaying crc errors
>> without any
>> corresponding IO errors from the storage. The bug was rare enough
>> that we'd
>> need to watch a large number of machines for a few days just to catch
>> it
>> happening.
>>
>> We're still running these patches through testing, but the fixup
>> worker bug
>> seems to account for the vast majority of crc errors we're seeing in
>> the fleet.
>> It's cleaning pages that were dirty, and creating a window where they
>> can be
>> reclaimed before we finish processing the page.
>
> I'm having flashbacks when I see 'fixup worker', and the test
> generic/208 does
> not make it better:
>
> generic/095 [18:07:03][ 3769.317862] run fstests generic/095 at
> 2018-06-20 18:07:03
> [ 3774.849685] BTRFS: device fsid 3acffad9-28e5-43ce-80e1-f5032e334cba
> devid 1 transid 5 /dev/vdb
> [ 3774.875409] BTRFS info (device vdb): disk space caching is enabled
> [ 3774.877723] BTRFS info (device vdb): has skinny extents
> [ 3774.879371] BTRFS info (device vdb): flagging fs with big metadata
> feature
> [ 3774.885020] BTRFS info (device vdb): checking UUID tree
> [ 3775.593329] Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O.
> Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!
> [ 3775.596979] File: /tmp/scratch/file2 PID: 12031 Comm: kworker/1:1
> [ 3776.642812] Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O.
> Possible data corruption due to collision with buffered I/O!
> [ 3776.645041] File: /tmp/scratch/file2 PID: 12033 Comm: kworker/3:0
> [ 3776.920634] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12036 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9319
> btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1d5/0x290 [btrfs]
> [ 3776.924182] Modules linked in: btrfs libcrc32c xor zstd_decompress
> zstd_compress xxhash raid6_pq loop [last unloaded: libcrc32c]
> [ 3776.927703] CPU: 0 PID: 12036 Comm: umount Not tainted
> 4.17.0-rc7-default+ #153
> [ 3776.929164] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
> [ 3776.931006] RIP: 0010:btrfs_destroy_inode+0x1d5/0x290 [btrfs]
Running generic/095 on current Linus git (without my patches), I'm
seeing this same warning. This makes me a little happy because I have
my patches in prod, but mostly sad because it's easier to find when the
suspect pool is small. I'll bisect.
-chris
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 14:56 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Btrfs: fix file data corruptions due to lost dirty bits Chris Mason
2018-06-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: don't clean dirty pages during buffered writes Chris Mason
2018-09-24 15:06 ` David Sterba
2018-06-20 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] Btrfs: keep pages dirty when using btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker Chris Mason
2018-06-28 14:03 ` David Sterba
2019-06-13 16:57 ` David Sterba
2019-10-09 17:20 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-06-20 19:33 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] Btrfs: fix file data corruptions due to lost dirty bits David Sterba
2018-06-20 19:48 ` Chris Mason
2018-06-20 20:24 ` David Sterba
2018-06-22 21:25 ` Chris Mason
2018-06-25 11:10 ` David Sterba
2018-06-25 13:55 ` Chris Mason
2018-06-21 15:01 ` Chris Mason [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D8C57277-E51B-47C7-9371-66EF2B5623E9@fb.com \
--to=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).