From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 1/9] iov_iter: add copy_struct_from_iter()
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:28:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YNTO1T6BEzmG6Uj5@relinquished.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whmRQWm_gVek32ekPqBi3zAKOsdK6_6Hx8nHp3H5JAMew@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:52:17AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:15 PM Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 03:00:39AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > Does that work for O_DIRECT and the required 512-byte alignment?
> >
> > I suppose the kernel could pad the encoded_iov structure with zeroes to
> > the next sector boundary, since zeroes are effectively noops for
> > encoded_iov.
>
> Ugh.
>
> I really think the whole "embed the control structure in the stream"
> is wrong. The alignment issue is just another sign of that.
>
> Separating it out is the right thing to do. At least the "first iov
> entry" thing did separate the control structure from the actual data.
> I detest the whole "embed the two together".
I'll suggest the fixed-size struct encoded_iov again, then. If we're
willing to give up some of the flexibility of a variable size, then
userspace can always put the fixed-size structure in its own iovec or
include it inline with the data, depending on what's more convenient and
whether it's using O_DIRECT. A fixed size is much easier for both the
kernel and userspace to deal with. Do we really need to support
unlimited extensions to encoded_iov, or can we stick 32-64 bytes of
reserved space at the end of the structure and call it a day?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 23:51 [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 0/9] fs: interface for directly reading/writing compressed data Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 1/9] iov_iter: add copy_struct_from_iter() Omar Sandoval
2021-06-18 18:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-18 19:42 ` Al Viro
2021-06-18 19:49 ` Al Viro
2021-06-18 20:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-18 20:32 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-18 20:58 ` Al Viro
2021-06-18 21:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-18 21:32 ` Al Viro
2021-06-18 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-18 22:10 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-18 22:32 ` Al Viro
2021-06-19 0:43 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-21 18:46 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-21 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-21 20:46 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-21 20:53 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-21 20:55 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-22 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2021-06-23 17:49 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-23 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-23 19:33 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-23 19:45 ` Al Viro
2021-06-23 20:46 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-23 21:39 ` Al Viro
2021-06-23 21:58 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-23 22:26 ` Al Viro
2021-06-24 2:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-24 6:14 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-24 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-24 18:28 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2021-06-24 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-24 22:41 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-06-25 3:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-06-25 16:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-06-25 21:07 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-07-07 17:59 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-07-19 15:44 ` Josef Bacik
2021-06-24 6:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-24 7:50 ` Omar Sandoval
2021-06-18 22:14 ` Al Viro
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 2/9] fs: add O_ALLOW_ENCODED open flag Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 3/9] fs: add RWF_ENCODED for reading/writing compressed data Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 4/9] btrfs: don't advance offset for compressed bios in btrfs_csum_one_bio() Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 5/9] btrfs: add ram_bytes and offset to btrfs_ordered_extent Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 6/9] btrfs: support different disk extent size for delalloc Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 7/9] btrfs: optionally extend i_size in cow_file_range_inline() Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 8/9] btrfs: implement RWF_ENCODED reads Omar Sandoval
2021-06-17 23:51 ` [PATCH RESEND x3 v9 9/9] btrfs: implement RWF_ENCODED writes Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YNTO1T6BEzmG6Uj5@relinquished.localdomain \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).