From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org> To: "François-Xavier Thomas" <fx.thomas@gmail.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Massive I/O usage from btrfs-cleaner after upgrading to 5.16 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:59:33 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <YeWgdQ2ZvceLTIej@debian9.Home> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YeVawBBE3r6hVhgs@debian9.Home> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:02:08PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:06:42AM +0100, François-Xavier Thomas wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > Just in case someone is having the same issue: Btrfs (in the > > btrfs-cleaner process) is taking a large amount of disk IO after > > upgrading to 5.16 on one of my volumes, and multiple other people seem > > to be having the same issue, see discussion in [0]. > > > > [1] is a close-up screenshot of disk I/O history (blue line is write > > ops, going from a baseline of some 10 ops/s to around 1k ops/s). I > > downgraded from 5.16 to 5.15 in the middle, which immediately restored > > previous performance. > > > > Common options between affected people are: ssd, autodefrag. No error > > in the logs, and no other issue aside from performance (the volume > > works just fine for accessing data). > > > > One person reports that SMART stats show a massive amount of blocks > > being written; unfortunately I do not have historical data for that so > > I cannot confirm, but this sounds likely given what I see on what > > should be a relatively new SSD. > > > > Any idea of what it could be related to? > > There was a big refactor of the defrag code that landed in 5.16. > > On a quick glance, when using autodefrag it seems we now can end up in an > infinite loop by marking the same range for degrag (IO) over and over. > > Can you try the following patch? (also at https://pastebin.com/raw/QR27Jv6n) Actually try this one instead: https://pastebin.com/raw/EbEfk1tF Also, there's a bug with defrag running into an (almost) infinite loop when attempting to defrag a 1 byte file. Someone ran into this and I've just sent a fix for it: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/patch/bcbfce0ff7e21bbfed2484b1457e560edf78020d.1642436805.git.fdmanana@suse.com/ Maybe that is what you are running into when using autodefrag. Firt try that fix for the 1 byte file case, and if after that you still run into problems, then try with the other patch above as well (both patches applied). Thanks. > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > index a5bd6926f7ff..0a9f6125a566 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c > @@ -1213,6 +1213,13 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > if (em->generation < newer_than) > goto next; > > + /* > + * Skip extents already under IO, otherwise we can end up in an > + * infinite loop when using auto defrag. > + */ > + if (em->generation == (u64)-1) > + goto next; > + > /* > * For do_compress case, we want to compress all valid file > * extents, thus no @extent_thresh or mergeable check. > > > > > > François-Xavier > > > > [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/btrfs/comments/s4nrzb/massive_performance_degradation_after_upgrading/ > > [1] https://imgur.com/oYhYat1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 17:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-01-17 10:06 François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-17 12:02 ` Filipe Manana 2022-01-17 16:59 ` Filipe Manana [this message] 2022-01-17 21:37 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-19 9:44 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-19 10:13 ` Filipe Manana 2022-01-20 11:37 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-20 11:44 ` Filipe Manana 2022-01-20 12:02 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-20 12:45 ` Qu Wenruo 2022-01-20 12:55 ` Filipe Manana 2022-01-20 17:46 ` Filipe Manana 2022-01-20 18:21 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-21 10:49 ` Filipe Manana 2022-01-21 19:39 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-21 23:34 ` Qu Wenruo 2022-01-22 18:20 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-24 7:00 ` Qu Wenruo 2022-01-25 20:00 ` François-Xavier Thomas 2022-01-25 23:29 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=YeWgdQ2ZvceLTIej@debian9.Home \ --to=fdmanana@kernel.org \ --cc=fx.thomas@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \ --subject='Re: Massive I/O usage from btrfs-cleaner after upgrading to 5.16' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).