linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
	Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GRUB bug with Btrfs multiple devices
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 22:11:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a48a6c50-3a03-0420-ad8c-f589fafe6035@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtSeZu8fRzjABXh3wxvBDEajGutAU4LWu0RcJv-6pd+RGQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 26/11/2019 05.05, Chris Murphy wrote:
> grub2-efi-x64-2.02-100.fc31.x86_64
> kernel-5.3.13-300.fc31.x86_64
> 
> I've seen this before, so it isn't a regression in either of the above
> versions. But I'm also not certain when the regression occurred,
> because the last time I tested Btrfs multiple devices (specifically
> data single profile), was years ago and I didn't run into this.

 From the video, it seems that GRUB complaints about a "failure reading". However GRUB is capable to perform the boot and because the profiles are "single (no redundancy), it seems a "false positive" error.

When I added the RADID5/6 support to grub, I remember errors like what you showed. However it happened 1 year ago, so my remember may be wrong.
I noticed that GRUB test a lot of disks (hd0 ... hd3) . Could you be so kindly to share the disks layout ? Most error is something like "failure reading sector 0xXX". However I can't read the XX number: could you be so kindly to tell us which number is "XX" ? It seems 0x80... but my eyes are bad and your video is even worse :-)

I think that the errors is due to the "rescan" logic (see grub commit [1]). Could you try a more recent grub (2.04 instead of 2.02) ?

> The gist to reproduce:
> 1. btrfs single device, single profile data, single profile metadata
> 2. device starts to run out of space; no problem 'btrfs device add
> /dev/'  voila it works, reboots, keeps on working for a while, but
> then...
> 3. install a kernel or two or three or four
> 
> I suspect that at some point kernels end up on the newly added device
> due to new block groups eventually being created there, and GRUB
> subsequently gets confused, starts spewing a bunch of error
> information which I have to page through. Eventually it does find
> everything and does boot. But it's kinda ugly and I'm not really sure
> how to gather more information.
> 
> Shaky cam video of the boot is here:
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/wvJbB6kBEFzNwogo6
> 
> 

[1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/grub-core/fs/btrfs.c?id=fd5a1d82f1d6a0482f5fe201ce646ddba8574bab


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-26 21:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26  4:05 GRUB bug with Btrfs multiple devices Chris Murphy
2019-11-26 21:11 ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2019-11-26 23:53   ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-27  1:35     ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-27  6:07       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2019-11-28  0:42         ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-28 17:58           ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2019-11-28 20:05             ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-28 21:57               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2019-11-29 17:57                 ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-29 19:54                   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2019-11-29 21:17                     ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-30  7:33                       ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-11-30  8:12                       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2019-11-30 16:38                         ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-27  6:09     ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2019-11-29 20:50     ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-11-29 21:11       ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-30  7:31         ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-11-30 16:31           ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-30 17:02             ` Andrei Borzenkov
2019-11-30 17:14               ` Chris Murphy
2019-11-30 17:34                 ` Chris Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a48a6c50-3a03-0420-ad8c-f589fafe6035@libero.it \
    --to=kreijack@libero.it \
    --cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).