From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] btrfs-progs: mkfs: Enhance minimal device size calculation to fix mkfs failure on small file
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:40:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a84fe81d-980a-e349-9643-fbdddc50ac44@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171127232131.GK3553@twin.jikos.cz>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2798 bytes --]
On 2017年11月28日 07:21, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:30:40AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> +u64 btrfs_min_dev_size(u32 nodesize, int mixed, u64 meta_profile,
>> + u64 data_profile)
>> +{
>> + u64 reserved = 0;
>> + u64 meta_size;
>> + u64 data_size;
>> +
>> + if (mixed)
>> + return 2 * (BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE +
>> + btrfs_min_global_blk_rsv_size(nodesize));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * minimal size calculation is complex due to several factors:
>> + * 1) Temporary chunk resue
>> + * If specified chunk profile is SINGLE, we can resue
>> + * temporary chunks, no need to alloc new chunks.
>> + *
>> + * 2) Different minimal chunk size for different profile
>> + * For initial sys chunk, chunk size is fixed to 4M.
>> + * For single profile, minimal chunk size is 8M for all.
>> + * For other profiles, minimal chunk and stripe size
>> + * differs from 8M to 64M.
>> + *
>> + * To calculate it a little easier, here we assume we don't
>> + * reuse any temporary chunk, and calculate the size all
>> + * by ourselves.
>> + *
>> + * Temporary chunks sizes are always fixed:
>> + * One initial sys chunk, one SINGLE meta, and one SINGLE data.
>> + * The latter two are all 8M, accroding to @calc_size of
>> + * btrfs_alloc_chunk().
>> + */
>> + reserved += BTRFS_MKFS_SYSTEM_GROUP_SIZE + SZ_8M * 2;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * For real chunks, we need to refer different sizes:
>> + * For SINGLE, it's still fixed to 8M (@calc_size).
>> + * For other profiles, refer to max(@min_stripe_size, @calc_size).
>> + *
>> + * And use the stripe size to calculate its physical used space.
>> + */
>> + if (meta_profile & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK)
>> + meta_size = SZ_8M + SZ_32M;
>> + else
>> + meta_size = SZ_8M + SZ_8M;
>> + /* Only metadata put 2 stripes into one disk */
>
> 'mkfs.btrfs -d dup' also works, so I think this should be handled here
> the same way as metadata, right?
Just a few lines under.
>
>> + if (meta_profile & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)
>> + meta_size *= 2;
>> + reserved += meta_size;
>> +
>> + if (data_profile & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK)
>> + data_size = SZ_64M;
>> + else
>> + data_size = SZ_8M;
>> + if (data_profile & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)
>> + data_size *= 2;
Here data DUP is also handled.
So the problem is about the word "Only".
Do I need to re-submit the whole patchset or just a separate patch to
update the comment?
Thanks,
Qu
>> + reserved += data_size;
>> + return reserved;
>> +}
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 520 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-01 1:30 [PATCH v4 0/4] mkfs: Fix minimal device check so that reported Qu Wenruo
2017-11-01 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] btrfs-progs: mkfs: Enhance minimal device size calculation to fix mkfs failure on small file Qu Wenruo
2017-11-27 23:21 ` David Sterba
2017-11-28 0:40 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2017-11-28 12:32 ` David Sterba
2017-11-01 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] btrfs-progs: test/common: Introduce run_mustfail_stdout Qu Wenruo
2017-11-27 23:28 ` David Sterba
2017-11-01 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] btrfs-progs: test/common: Enhance prepare_test_dev to reset device size Qu Wenruo
2017-11-27 23:30 ` David Sterba
2017-11-01 1:30 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] btrfs-progs: test/mkfs: Test if the minimal device size is valid Qu Wenruo
2017-11-28 14:34 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a84fe81d-980a-e349-9643-fbdddc50ac44@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).