From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] btrfs: sysfs, add read_policy attribute
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 16:25:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b39e2e18-4116-f77b-df59-d39aa006ea93@applied-asynchrony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1578372741-21586-1-git-send-email-anand.jain@oracle.com>
On 1/7/20 5:52 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
> Add
>
> /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
>
> attribute so that the read policy for the raid1 and raid10 chunks can be
> tuned.
>
> When this attribute is read, it shall show all available policies, and
> the active policy is with in [ ], read_policy attribute can be written
> using one of the items showed in the read.
>
> For example:
> cat /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
> [by_pid]
> echo by_pid > /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
> echo -n by_pid > /sys/fs/btrfs/UUID/read_policy
This may seem like pointless bikeshedding, but can we please name the policy
without the leading "by_", i.e. only "pid"? By definition what happens is always
"by" the chosen policy, so it's redundant.
Otherwise a great step forward, thank you!
cheers
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-05 15:14 [PATCH v4 0/2] readmirror feature (sysfs and in-memory only approach) Anand Jain
2020-01-05 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add read_policy framework Anand Jain
2020-01-06 16:22 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-29 18:26 ` David Sterba
2020-02-11 8:31 ` Anand Jain
2020-01-05 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: sysfs, add read_policy attribute Anand Jain
2020-01-06 16:21 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-07 4:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Anand Jain
2020-01-07 15:03 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-07 15:25 ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2020-01-08 4:16 ` [PATCH v3 " Anand Jain
2020-01-29 18:49 ` David Sterba
2020-02-12 14:24 ` Anand Jain
2020-01-29 18:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] readmirror feature (sysfs and in-memory only approach) David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b39e2e18-4116-f77b-df59-d39aa006ea93@applied-asynchrony.com \
--to=holger@applied-asynchrony.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).