From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk>,
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Chasing IO errors. BTRFS: error (device dm-2) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2907: errno=-5 IO failure
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:29:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e439aafe-8836-b761-3b72-b9215b463c09@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2433d4cb-e7f7-72c5-977b-02f51e9717b3@petezilla.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5231 bytes --]
On 2019/8/21 下午4:05, Peter Chant wrote:
> hings
> On 8/20/19 10:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:10 PM Peter Chant <pete@petezilla.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> Chasing IO errors. BTRFS: error (device dm-2) in
>>> btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2907: errno=-5 IO failure
>>>
>>>
>>> I've just had an odd one.
>>>
>>> Over the last few days I've noticed a file system blocking, if that is
>>> the correct term, and this morning go read only. This resulted in a lot
>>> of checksum errors.
>>
>> That doesn't sound good. Checksum errors where? A complete start to
>> finish dmesg is most useful in this case.
>>
> Things to note:
> System has five drives:
> SSD for boot eith ext4 and btrfs partitions - no issues.
> NVME for lxc and a database, via lvm it carries a btrfs and xfs file
> systems, no issue.
> Various overlayfs for lxc containers.
>
> Three WD reds, 2x3TB, 1x4TB, RAID1 problematic.
>
> I'll run the checks shortly.
Well, check will also report that transid mismatch, and possibly a lot
of extent tree corruption.
[...]
> [ 48.540518] BTRFS: device label Data devid 3 transid 2265510 /dev/dm-2
> [ 62.219602] BTRFS info (device dm-2): allowing degraded mounts
> [ 62.220612] BTRFS info (device dm-2): use zstd compression, level 3
> [ 62.221339] BTRFS info (device dm-2): enabling auto defrag
> [ 62.222031] BTRFS info (device dm-2): disk space caching is enabled
> [ 62.223323] BTRFS warning (device dm-2): devid 5 uuid
> 89195df2-4e3d-4856-aab0-2aa9f59b3846 is missing
> [ 62.232894] BTRFS warning (device dm-2): devid 5 uuid
> 89195df2-4e3d-4856-aab0-2aa9f59b3846 is missing
> [ 95.956952] BTRFS info (device dm-2): checking UUID tree
> [ 99.232089] BTRFS info (device dm-2): device fsid
> 159b8826-8380-45be-acb6-0cb992a8dfd7 devid 4 moved
> old:/dev/mapper/data_disk_1 new:/dev/dm-1
> [ 99.232146] BTRFS info (device dm-2): device fsid
> 159b8826-8380-45be-acb6-0cb992a8dfd7 devid 3 moved
> old:/dev/mapper/data_disk_2 new:/dev/dm-2
> [ 99.237670] BTRFS info (device dm-2): device fsid
> 159b8826-8380-45be-acb6-0cb992a8dfd7 devid 4 moved old:/dev/dm-1
> new:/dev/mapper/data_disk_1
> [ 99.242692] BTRFS info (device dm-2): device fsid
> 159b8826-8380-45be-acb6-0cb992a8dfd7 devid 3 moved old:/dev/dm-2
> new:/dev/mapper/data_disk_2
> [ 99.710315] EDAC amd64: Node 0: DRAM ECC disabled.
> [ 99.710317] EDAC amd64: ECC disabled in the BIOS or no ECC
> capability, module will not load.
> Either enable ECC checking or force module loading by
> setting 'ecc_enable_override'.
> (Note that use of the override may cause unknown side
> effects.)
Not sure what the ECC part is doing, but it repeats quite some times.
I'd assume it's unrelated though.
[...]
> [ 142.507291] BTRFS error (device dm-2): parent transid verify failed
> on 13395960053760 wanted 2265296 found 2263090
> [ 142.544548] BTRFS error (device dm-2): parent transid verify failed
> on 13395960053760 wanted 2265296 found 2263090
> [ 142.544561] BTRFS: error (device dm-2) in
> btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2907: errno=-5 IO failure
This means, btrfs is trying to read extent tree for CoW, but at that
time, extent tree is already corrupted, thus it returns -EIO.
And btrfs_run_delayed_refs just returns error.
Not sure if it's related to device replace, but anyway the corruption
just happened.
The device replace may be an interesting clue, as currently our
dm-log-writes are mostly focused on single device usage.
Then I'd recommend to do regular rescue procedure:
- Try that skip_bg patchset if possible
This provides the best salvage method so far, full subvolume
available, although needs out-of-tree patches.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-btrfs/list/?series=130637
- btrfs-restore
The regular unmounted recover, needs extra space. Latest btrfs-progs
recommended.
Thanks,
Qu
> [ 142.544564] BTRFS info (device dm-2): forced readonly
> [ 144.108801] lxc-int: port 2(veth4OH9N0) entered disabled state
> [ 144.144061] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [ 144.144110] lxc-int: port 2(veth4OH9N0) entered blocking state
> [ 144.144113] lxc-int: port 2(veth4OH9N0) entered forwarding state
> [ 145.973587] NFSD: attempt to initialize umh client tracking in a
> container ignored.
> [ 145.973629] NFSD: attempt to initialize legacy client tracking in a
> container ignored.
> [ 145.973629] NFSD: Unable to initialize client recovery tracking! (-22)
> [ 145.973631] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period (net f0000492)
> [ 146.341292] lxc-int: port 4(vethNJGFQC) entered disabled state
> [ 146.379910] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [ 146.379947] lxc-int: port 4(vethNJGFQC) entered blocking state
> [ 146.379949] lxc-int: port 4(vethNJGFQC) entered forwarding state
> [ 156.039660] lxc-int: port 3(veth70VEEM) entered disabled state
> [ 156.069863] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
> [ 156.069900] lxc-int: port 3(veth70VEEM) entered blocking state
> [ 156.069902] lxc-int: port 3(veth70VEEM) entered forwarding state
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-21 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-20 20:36 Chasing IO errors. BTRFS: error (device dm-2) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2907: errno=-5 IO failure Peter Chant
2019-08-20 21:59 ` Chris Murphy
2019-08-20 23:47 ` Peter Chant
2019-08-21 8:05 ` Peter Chant
2019-08-21 7:29 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2019-08-21 21:38 ` Peter Chant
2019-08-21 23:32 ` Qu Wenruo
2019-09-08 7:14 ` Pete
2019-08-20 23:45 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e439aafe-8836-b761-3b72-b9215b463c09@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=pete@petezilla.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).