From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41480 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932252AbaFLHpd (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2014 03:45:33 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WuzhU-0002Ld-65 for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:45:32 +0200 Received: from ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.22.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:45:32 +0200 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-22-224.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:45:32 +0200 To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: fix missing parity stripe for raid6 in chunk-recover Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1402539901-22779-1-git-send-email-guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Gui Hecheng posted on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:24:59 +0800 as excerpted: > When deal with the p & q stripes for data profile raid6, chunk-recover > forgets to insert them into the chunk record. Just insert them back > freely. > Also wrap the inert procedure into a new function, fill_chunk_up. If there's a v2 anyway: s/inert/insert/ ? (For a moment I was contemplating the reasons one might wrap a stub, which is how I was translating inert procedure. Then it hit me... =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman