On 06.05.2021 12:45:38, Sottas Guillaume (LMB) wrote:
> Thank you for your investigations, seems to be the way to go? What is
> the next step, could I help in any way or are you going to merge your
> patch directly? I'm not really sure how we should go further in order
> to inegrate your fix in the code...

Maybe we can use sk->sk_err directly instead of adding a new variable.
I've send a patch, please test.

> Thank you in advance for your feedback,

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |