From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: thomas@the-wagner.de
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Write canfd_frame to can interface
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:55:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729105539.ppi7rm6uglwbpyov@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <006401d78461$0b868b60$2293a220$@the-wagner.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1950 bytes --]
On 29.07.2021 12:03:56, thomas@the-wagner.de wrote:
> I have been working on getting my device compatible with both, CAN and
> CAN FD.
>
> For receiving this is working straight forward. My physical interface
> is CAN FD capable and no matter whether I set it up as
> ip link set can0 type can bitrate 500000 fd off
> or
> ip link set can0 type can bitrate 500000 fd dbitrate 2000000 off
> in code I can always just use the canfd_frame struct and set the
> CAN_RAW_FD_FRAMES option. Doing this I can receive CAN and CAN FD
> frames in both modes without having to fall back to the can_frame
> struct (as explained in the docs).
>
> For sending I expected a similar behavior. I set the CAN_RAW_FD_FRAMES
> option and always sent using the canfd_frame struct. Sadly, this fails
> while writing on the interface when it is not in FD-mode with an
> Invalid Argument error. To make this work without falling back to the
> can_frame struct I just do
> write(sock, &canfdf, sizeof(struct can_frame));
> where canfdf is a canfd_frame. Not setting CAN_RAW_FD_FRAMES when the
> interface is in CAN mode but sending using the full canfd_frame won't
> work too.
>
> Is this expected behavior?
Yes.
> Shouldn't the error only be returned if the
> canfd_frame I pass has more than 8 bytes when the interface is not in
> FD-mode?
A CAN-2.0 frame with 8 bytes is something different than a CAN-FD frame
with 8 bytes. The kernel uses the length of the frame to decide if it is
a CAN-2.0 or CAN-FD frame. If your CAN controller has switched CAN-FD
off, it cannot send CAN-FD frames, thus you get an error.
Does that make sense?
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 10:03 Write canfd_frame to can interface thomas
2021-07-29 10:55 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2021-07-29 12:02 ` Thomas Wagner
2021-07-29 12:14 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210729105539.ppi7rm6uglwbpyov@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@the-wagner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).