On 04.07.2022 11:35:52, Rhett Aultman wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2022, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> 
> > On 28.06.2022 10:09:16, Vincent MAILHOL wrote:
> > > > In light of this, while I remain committed to helping work the problem, I
> > > > can't help but wonder if it's worth it to consider my original patch in a
> > > > new light?
> > >
> > > Yes, it makes sense to take your initial patch.
> >
> > done
> 
> Thanks.  At this point, is there anything more needed from me on that
> patch?  Addition of Reviewed-by: lines or similar?

No need to, it's already mainline :)

> > > I will reiterate that
> > > I do not like the way it is done but you are fixing a memory leak and
> > > delaying the fix furthermore is not good.
> 
> As an addendum, I think I might have found a way to scare up resources
> and time for that benchmarking work, so while I don't want to start making
> promises, there's a reasonable chance we might be able to do this in the
> next few weeks.

Nice!

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |