On 03/14/2015 04:41 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: > On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> On 03/14/2015 02:11 PM, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote: >>> From: Ahmed S. Darwish >>> >>> Use can-dev's unregister_candev() instead of directly calling >>> networking unregister_netdev(). While both are functionally >>> equivalent, unregister_candev() might do extra stuff in the >>> future than just calling networking layer unregistration code. >> >> Since 2 goes into can, I've applied this into can-next. > Was this a cherry-pick? Because I was going to send a new > series with patch #2 better worded, and with a new patch for > the endiannes issue. Yes, no need to resend patch #3, as it's already applied to can-next. regards, Marc 1 = can: kvaser_usb: Fix tx queue start/stop race conditions 2 = can: kvaser_usb: Utilize all possible tx URBs 3 = can: kvaser_usb: Use can-dev unregistration mechanism 4 = the endianess issue 1 = is in linux-can and included in linux-can-fixes-for-4.0-20150314 2 = will go into linux-can with a better commit message which is currently prepare by you will be in the next pull request for net 3 = is in linux-can-next and will be included in the next pull request for net-next 4 = is currently prepared by you will be in the next pull request for net This means, you'll send me patches 2 and 4 in a new v5 series. (This patches will of course have new numbers, 1 and 2.) -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |