On 11/20/20 11:04 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> The naming of can_dlc as element of struct can_frame and also as variable
> name is misleading as it claims to be a 'data length CODE' but in reality
> it always was a plain data length.
> 
> With the indroduction of a new 'len' element in struct can_frame we can now
> remove can_dlc as name and make clear which of the former uses was a plain
> length (-> 'len') or a data length code (-> 'dlc') value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>

Thanks for the patch, my git rebase successfully worked without problems,
however taking this patch.

Thanks,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |