* ksmbd mailing list
@ 2021-06-22 6:12 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: 'Christoph Hellwig' @ 2021-06-22 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon; +Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs
Is there a good reason to have a ksmbd-specific list instead of pooling
all the smb3 knowledge on a single list, similar to how nfs development
works?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-22 6:12 ` ksmbd mailing list 'Christoph Hellwig'
@ 2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-22 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Christoph Hellwig'
Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs, 'Steve French',
'ronnie sahlberg',
aurelien.aptel
> Is there a good reason to have a ksmbd-specific list instead of pooling all the smb3 knowledge on a
> single list, similar to how nfs development works?
There are users who subscribe only to ksmbd-specific list since ksmbd is out of tree. So we specified
both lists in MAINTAINERS. I do not object to use single list and kill the specific list after
ksmbd is merged into mainline.
Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien.
Any opinions?
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel
2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aurélien Aptel @ 2021-06-22 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon, 'Christoph Hellwig'
Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs, 'Steve French',
'ronnie sahlberg',
aurelien.aptel
"Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes:
> Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien.
> Any opinions?
I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should
ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag somewhere in the subject, which is
hard to enforce.
Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for
cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the
subject which can confuse people and scripts.
Cheers,
--
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel
@ 2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Aurélien Aptel', 'Christoph Hellwig'
Cc: linux-cifsd-devel, linux-cifs, 'Steve French',
'ronnie sahlberg'
> "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes:
> > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien.
> > Any opinions?
>
> I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag
> somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce.
>
> Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for
> cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the subject which can confuse people and
> scripts.
Thanks for your opinion!
I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org) in MAINTAINERS.
> Cheers,
> --
> Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
> GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French
2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steve French @ 2021-06-23 2:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Namjae Jeon
Cc: Aurélien Aptel, Christoph Hellwig,
COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER, CIFS, ronnie sahlberg
We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki
pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for
each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that
indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd]
if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools)
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:41 PM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> > "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes:
> > > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien.
> > > Any opinions?
> >
> > I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag
> > somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce.
> >
> > Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for
> > cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the subject which can confuse people and
> > scripts.
> Thanks for your opinion!
> I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org) in MAINTAINERS.
>
> > Cheers,
> > --
> > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
> > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
> > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
> > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)
>
>
--
Thanks,
Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French
@ 2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Steve French'
Cc: 'Aurélien Aptel', 'Christoph Hellwig',
'COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER', 'CIFS',
'ronnie sahlberg'
> We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki pages on samba.org and also in
> the kernel documentation directory for each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix
> that indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd] if you prefer, [cifs] for
> the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools)
Okay, I will update it in wiki and kernel documentation.
Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:41 PM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > > "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com> writes:
> > > > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien.
> > > > Any opinions?
> > >
> > > I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should
> > > ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce.
> > >
> > > Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches
> > > for
> > > cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the
> > > subject which can confuse people and scripts.
> > Thanks for your opinion!
> > I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org) in MAINTAINERS.
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > --
> > > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
> > > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE
> > > Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
> > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG
> > > München)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French
2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon
@ 2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-23 5:04 ` Namjae Jeon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2021-06-23 4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steve French
Cc: Namjae Jeon, Aur??lien Aptel, Christoph Hellwig,
COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER, CIFS, ronnie sahlberg
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:52:33PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki
> pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for
> each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that
> indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd]
> if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools)
The normal kernel patch prefixes would be:
cifs:
and
ksmbd:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* RE: ksmbd mailing list
2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2021-06-23 5:04 ` Namjae Jeon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Namjae Jeon @ 2021-06-23 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Christoph Hellwig', 'Steve French'
Cc: 'Aur??lien Aptel',
'COMMON INTERNET FILE SYSTEM SERVER', 'CIFS',
'ronnie sahlberg'
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:52:33PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> > We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki
> > pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for
> > each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that
> > indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd]
> > if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools)
>
> The normal kernel patch prefixes would be:
>
> cifs:
>
> and
>
> ksmbd:
Yes, Sure:)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-23 5:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20210622061228epcas1p247d557ef24a971eaf395edd6174bed5e@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2021-06-22 6:12 ` ksmbd mailing list 'Christoph Hellwig'
2021-06-22 6:58 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-22 10:37 ` Aurélien Aptel
2021-06-23 2:41 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 2:52 ` Steve French
2021-06-23 4:01 ` Namjae Jeon
2021-06-23 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-06-23 5:04 ` Namjae Jeon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).