* [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
@ 2019-10-30 2:59 Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-30 2:59 ` [PATCH] " Ronnie Sahlberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-30 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs
Pavel,
version 3 of the patch with your suggestions.
I left the full commit message of the deadlocked threads as is though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-30 2:59 [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-30 2:59 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-30 15:46 ` Pavel Shilovsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-30 2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs; +Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg
This patch moves the final part of the cifsFileInfo_put() logic where we
need a write lock on lock_sem to be processed in a separate thread that
holds no other locks.
This is to prevent deadlocks like the one below:
> there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write
> cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from
> cifs_new_fileinfo
>
> and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them
> waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all
> for the same page of the file
>
> 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file
> 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page
> 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> 1 __lock_page
>
>
> so processes are blocked waiting on:
> page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page
> inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> inode->i_rwsem for the file
> cifsInodeInflock_sem
>
>
>
> here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide
> anything more/better):
>
> [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d
> #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d
> #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> * (I think legitimize_path is bogus)
>
> in path_openat
> } else {
> const char *s = path_init(nd, flags);
> while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) &&
> (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<<
>
> do_last:
> if (open_flag & O_CREAT)
> inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<<
> else
> so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory
>
> DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/
> inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0
>
> <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>:
> owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 -
> reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> waitlist: 2
> 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.926
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0 1:17:26.700
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
>
>
> the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is:
>
> [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs]
> #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs]
> #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at ffffffff9b04d4bd
> #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339 [cifs]
> #9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a [cifs]
> #10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs]
> #11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7
> #12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> #13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> #14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
>
> crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> index = 0x8
> mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0
> flags = 0xfffffc0008095
>
> PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
> PG_locked 0 0000001
> PG_uptodate 2 0000004
> PG_lru 4 0000010
> PG_waiters 7 0000080
> PG_writeback 15 0008000
>
>
> inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40
> inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0
> DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG
> /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853
>
>
> this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is
> laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and in
> _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInflock_sem
> for the file itself.
>
>
> <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>:
> owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 -
> reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> waitlist: 1
> 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.912
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
>
> this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file
>
> the owner:
>
> [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f
> #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf
> #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c
> #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs]
> #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4
> #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a
> #9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b [cifs]
> #10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> #11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> #12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> #13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's writing,
> and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other processes
>
>
> the other tasks:
> [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07 [cifs]
> #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs]
> #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a
> #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f
> #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> #9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> #10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem
>
>
> [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs]
> #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e
> #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614
> #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f
> #9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c
>
> closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem
>
>
> [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6
> #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028
> #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165
> #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs]
> #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1
> #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e
> #9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> in __filemap_fdatawait_range
> wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> for the same page of the file
>
>
>
> [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs]
> #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> inode_lock(inode);
>
>
> and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is available
> (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory
> ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable
>
> [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4
> COMMAND: "ls"
> #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421
> #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2
> #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56
> #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c
> #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6
> #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> in iterate_dir:
> if (shared)
> res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<<
> else
> res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
>
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
---
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 13 +++++++-
fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 3 +-
fs/cifs/file.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index e4e3b573d20c..f8e201c45ccb 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ extern mempool_t *cifs_mid_poolp;
struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
+struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
__u32 cifs_lock_secret;
@@ -1557,11 +1558,18 @@ init_cifs(void)
goto out_destroy_cifsiod_wq;
}
+ fileinfo_put_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsfileinfoput",
+ WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+ if (!fileinfo_put_wq) {
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
+ }
+
cifsoplockd_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsoplockd",
WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
if (!cifsoplockd_wq) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
+ goto out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq;
}
rc = cifs_fscache_register();
@@ -1627,6 +1635,8 @@ init_cifs(void)
cifs_fscache_unregister();
out_destroy_cifsoplockd_wq:
destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
+out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq:
+ destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
out_destroy_decrypt_wq:
destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
out_destroy_cifsiod_wq:
@@ -1656,6 +1666,7 @@ exit_cifs(void)
cifs_fscache_unregister();
destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
+ destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
destroy_workqueue(cifsiod_wq);
cifs_proc_clean();
}
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index d78bfcc19156..0819b6498a3c 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1265,6 +1265,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
struct mutex fh_mutex; /* prevents reopen race after dead ses*/
struct cifs_search_info srch_inf;
struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
+ struct work_struct put; /* work for the final part of _put */
};
struct cifs_io_parms {
@@ -1370,7 +1371,6 @@ cifsFileInfo_get_locked(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
}
struct cifsFileInfo *cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
-void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_hdlr);
void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
#define CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG 1
@@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@ void cifs_queue_oplock_break(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
extern const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops;
extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
extern struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
+extern struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
extern __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 67e7d0ffe385..d1dedb8fb31f 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -375,30 +375,7 @@ cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
return cifs_file;
}
-/**
- * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
- *
- * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
- */
-void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
-{
- _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true);
-}
-
-/**
- * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
- *
- * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
- * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock and
- * cifs_file->file_info_lock.
- *
- * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
- * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
- * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
- * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
- *
- */
-void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
+void cifsFileInfo_put_final(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
{
struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
@@ -409,7 +386,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
struct cifs_fid fid;
struct cifs_pending_open open;
- bool oplock_break_cancelled;
spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
spin_lock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
@@ -449,9 +425,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
spin_unlock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
- oplock_break_cancelled = wait_oplock_handler ?
- cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break) : false;
-
if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
unsigned int xid;
@@ -462,9 +435,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
_free_xid(xid);
}
- if (oplock_break_cancelled)
- cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
-
cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
/*
@@ -487,6 +457,61 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
kfree(cifs_file);
}
+static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file = container_of(work,
+ struct cifsFileInfo, put);
+
+ cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
+}
+
+/**
+ * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
+ *
+ * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
+ * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock,
+ * cinode->open_file_lock and cifs_file->file_info_lock.
+ *
+ * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
+ * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
+ * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
+ * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
+ *
+ */
+void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file,
+ bool wait_oplock_handler, bool offload)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
+ struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
+
+ spin_lock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
+ if (cifs_file->count > 1) {
+ cifs_file->count--;
+ spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
+
+ if (wait_oplock_handler && cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break))
+ cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
+
+ if (offload) {
+ INIT_WORK(&cifs_file->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
+ queue_work(fileinfo_put_wq, &cifs_file->put);
+ } else
+ cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
+}
+
+/**
+ * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
+ *
+ * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
+ */
+void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
+{
+ _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true, true);
+}
+
int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
@@ -808,7 +833,7 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool can_flush)
int cifs_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
if (file->private_data != NULL) {
- cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data);
+ _cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data, true, false);
file->private_data = NULL;
}
@@ -4742,7 +4767,7 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
cinode);
cifs_dbg(FYI, "Oplock release rc = %d\n", rc);
}
- _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */);
+ _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */, true);
cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode);
}
--
2.13.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-30 2:59 ` [PATCH] " Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-30 15:46 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-30 16:56 ` Pavel Shilovsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2019-10-30 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs
вт, 29 окт. 2019 г. в 19:59, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>:
>
> This patch moves the final part of the cifsFileInfo_put() logic where we
> need a write lock on lock_sem to be processed in a separate thread that
> holds no other locks.
> This is to prevent deadlocks like the one below:
>
> > there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write
> > cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from
> > cifs_new_fileinfo
> >
> > and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them
> > waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all
> > for the same page of the file
> >
> > 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file
> > 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page
> > 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > 1 __lock_page
> >
> >
> > so processes are blocked waiting on:
> > page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page
> > inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > inode->i_rwsem for the file
> > cifsInodeInflock_sem
> >
> >
> >
> > here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide
> > anything more/better):
> >
> > [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d
> > #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d
> > #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > * (I think legitimize_path is bogus)
> >
> > in path_openat
> > } else {
> > const char *s = path_init(nd, flags);
> > while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) &&
> > (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<<
> >
> > do_last:
> > if (open_flag & O_CREAT)
> > inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<<
> > else
> > so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> >
> > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/
> > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0
> >
> > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>:
> > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 -
> > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > waitlist: 2
> > 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.926
> > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0 1:17:26.700
> > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
> >
> >
> > the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is:
> >
> > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> > #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs]
> > #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs]
> > #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at ffffffff9b04d4bd
> > #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339 [cifs]
> > #9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a [cifs]
> > #10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs]
> > #11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7
> > #12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > #13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > #14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> >
> > cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> >
> > crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > index = 0x8
> > mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0
> > flags = 0xfffffc0008095
> >
> > PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
> > PG_locked 0 0000001
> > PG_uptodate 2 0000004
> > PG_lru 4 0000010
> > PG_waiters 7 0000080
> > PG_writeback 15 0008000
> >
> >
> > inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40
> > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0
> > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG
> > /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853
> >
> >
> > this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is
> > laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and in
> > _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > for the file itself.
> >
> >
> > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>:
> > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 -
> > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > waitlist: 1
> > 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.912
> > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> >
> > this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file
> >
> > the owner:
> >
> > [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f
> > #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf
> > #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c
> > #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs]
> > #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4
> > #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a
> > #9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b [cifs]
> > #10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > #11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > #12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > #13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> >
> > the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's writing,
> > and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other processes
> >
> >
> > the other tasks:
> > [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07 [cifs]
> > #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs]
> > #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a
> > #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f
> > #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > #9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > #10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> >
> > this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem
> >
> >
> > [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> > #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs]
> > #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e
> > #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614
> > #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f
> > #9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c
> >
> > closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem
> >
> >
> > [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6
> > #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028
> > #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165
> > #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs]
> > #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1
> > #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e
> > #9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> >
> > in __filemap_fdatawait_range
> > wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> > for the same page of the file
> >
> >
> >
> > [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7
> > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs]
> > #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> >
> > inode_lock(inode);
> >
> >
> > and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is available
> > (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory
> > ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable
> >
> > [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4
> > COMMAND: "ls"
> > #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421
> > #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2
> > #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56
> > #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c
> > #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6
> > #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> >
> > in iterate_dir:
> > if (shared)
> > res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<<
> > else
> > res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
> >
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 13 +++++++-
> fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 3 +-
> fs/cifs/file.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> index e4e3b573d20c..f8e201c45ccb 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ extern mempool_t *cifs_mid_poolp;
>
> struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> +struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
>
> @@ -1557,11 +1558,18 @@ init_cifs(void)
> goto out_destroy_cifsiod_wq;
> }
>
> + fileinfo_put_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsfileinfoput",
> + WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> + if (!fileinfo_put_wq) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> + }
> +
> cifsoplockd_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsoplockd",
> WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> if (!cifsoplockd_wq) {
> rc = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> + goto out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq;
> }
>
> rc = cifs_fscache_register();
> @@ -1627,6 +1635,8 @@ init_cifs(void)
> cifs_fscache_unregister();
> out_destroy_cifsoplockd_wq:
> destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> +out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq:
> + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> out_destroy_decrypt_wq:
> destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> out_destroy_cifsiod_wq:
> @@ -1656,6 +1666,7 @@ exit_cifs(void)
> cifs_fscache_unregister();
> destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> destroy_workqueue(cifsiod_wq);
> cifs_proc_clean();
> }
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index d78bfcc19156..0819b6498a3c 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -1265,6 +1265,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
> struct mutex fh_mutex; /* prevents reopen race after dead ses*/
> struct cifs_search_info srch_inf;
> struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
> + struct work_struct put; /* work for the final part of _put */
> };
>
> struct cifs_io_parms {
> @@ -1370,7 +1371,6 @@ cifsFileInfo_get_locked(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> }
>
> struct cifsFileInfo *cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_hdlr);
> void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
>
> #define CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG 1
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@ void cifs_queue_oplock_break(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
> extern const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops;
> extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> extern struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> +extern struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> extern __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 67e7d0ffe385..d1dedb8fb31f 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -375,30 +375,7 @@ cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> return cifs_file;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> - *
> - * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> - */
> -void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> -{
> - _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> - * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> - *
> - * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> - * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock and
> - * cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> - *
> - * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> - * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> - * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> - * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> - *
> - */
> -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> +void cifsFileInfo_put_final(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> {
> struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
> @@ -409,7 +386,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
> struct cifs_fid fid;
> struct cifs_pending_open open;
> - bool oplock_break_cancelled;
>
> spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> spin_lock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> @@ -449,9 +425,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> spin_unlock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
>
> - oplock_break_cancelled = wait_oplock_handler ?
> - cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break) : false;
> -
> if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
> struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
> unsigned int xid;
> @@ -462,9 +435,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> _free_xid(xid);
> }
>
> - if (oplock_break_cancelled)
> - cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> -
> cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
>
> /*
> @@ -487,6 +457,61 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> kfree(cifs_file);
> }
>
> +static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file = container_of(work,
> + struct cifsFileInfo, put);
> +
> + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> + *
> + * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> + * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock,
> + * cinode->open_file_lock and cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> + *
> + * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> + * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> + * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> + * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> + *
> + */
> +void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file,
> + bool wait_oplock_handler, bool offload)
> +{
> + struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> + struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
> +
> + spin_lock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> + if (cifs_file->count > 1) {
> + cifs_file->count--;
> + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> +
> + if (wait_oplock_handler && cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break))
> + cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
At this point the file info is still in the lists and can be
referenced by other threads not only including oplock break routine.
So, we can't cancel oplock break here - it would lead to big timeouts
to other clients trying to open the file because the server will be
waiting for an oplock break ack.
Let's do it in cifsFileInfo_put_final() as it was originally in
cifsFileInfo_put() and we do not need an extra *wait_oplock_handler*
argument - just cancel it unconditionally. If a caller of this
function don't want to deadlock on himself (like cifs_oplock_break) it
will just specify *offload* as True.
> +
> + if (offload) {
> + INIT_WORK(&cifs_file->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
> + queue_work(fileinfo_put_wq, &cifs_file->put);
> + } else
> + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> + *
> + * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> + */
> +void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> +{
> + _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true, true);
> +}
> +
> int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>
> {
> @@ -808,7 +833,7 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool can_flush)
> int cifs_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> if (file->private_data != NULL) {
> - cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data);
> + _cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data, true, false);
> file->private_data = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -4742,7 +4767,7 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
> cinode);
> cifs_dbg(FYI, "Oplock release rc = %d\n", rc);
> }
> - _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */);
> + _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */, true);
As mentioned above, here we only need *offload* as True to not wait
for ourselves.
> cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode);
> }
>
> --
> 2.13.6
>
Other than that, I think we the patch is on the right track. It should
give us an opportunity to do file handle batching easily.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-30 15:46 ` Pavel Shilovsky
@ 2019-10-30 16:56 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-31 1:04 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2019-10-30 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs
ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 08:46, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>:
>
> вт, 29 окт. 2019 г. в 19:59, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>:
> >
> > This patch moves the final part of the cifsFileInfo_put() logic where we
> > need a write lock on lock_sem to be processed in a separate thread that
> > holds no other locks.
> > This is to prevent deadlocks like the one below:
> >
> > > there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write
> > > cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from
> > > cifs_new_fileinfo
> > >
> > > and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them
> > > waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all
> > > for the same page of the file
> > >
> > > 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file
> > > 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page
> > > 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > > 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > > 1 __lock_page
> > >
> > >
> > > so processes are blocked waiting on:
> > > page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page
> > > inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > > inode->i_rwsem for the file
> > > cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide
> > > anything more/better):
> > >
> > > [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > > #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d
> > > #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d
> > > #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > * (I think legitimize_path is bogus)
> > >
> > > in path_openat
> > > } else {
> > > const char *s = path_init(nd, flags);
> > > while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) &&
> > > (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<<
> > >
> > > do_last:
> > > if (open_flag & O_CREAT)
> > > inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<<
> > > else
> > > so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > >
> > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > > ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/
> > > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0
> > >
> > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>:
> > > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 -
> > > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > > waitlist: 2
> > > 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.926
> > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > > 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0 1:17:26.700
> > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
> > >
> > >
> > > the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is:
> > >
> > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> > > #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs]
> > > #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs]
> > > #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at ffffffff9b04d4bd
> > > #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339 [cifs]
> > > #9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a [cifs]
> > > #10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs]
> > > #11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7
> > > #12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > #13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > #14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > >
> > > cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > >
> > > crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > > index = 0x8
> > > mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0
> > > flags = 0xfffffc0008095
> > >
> > > PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
> > > PG_locked 0 0000001
> > > PG_uptodate 2 0000004
> > > PG_lru 4 0000010
> > > PG_waiters 7 0000080
> > > PG_writeback 15 0008000
> > >
> > >
> > > inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40
> > > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0
> > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > > ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG
> > > /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853
> > >
> > >
> > > this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is
> > > laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and in
> > > _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > > for the file itself.
> > >
> > >
> > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>:
> > > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 -
> > > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > > waitlist: 1
> > > 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.912
> > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > >
> > > this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file
> > >
> > > the owner:
> > >
> > > [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > > #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f
> > > #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf
> > > #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c
> > > #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs]
> > > #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4
> > > #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a
> > > #9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b [cifs]
> > > #10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > > #11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > > #12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > > #13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > >
> > > the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's writing,
> > > and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other processes
> > >
> > >
> > > the other tasks:
> > > [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07 [cifs]
> > > #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs]
> > > #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a
> > > #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f
> > > #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > #9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > #10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > >
> > > this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem
> > >
> > >
> > > [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> > > #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs]
> > > #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e
> > > #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614
> > > #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f
> > > #9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c
> > >
> > > closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem
> > >
> > >
> > > [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > > #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6
> > > #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028
> > > #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165
> > > #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs]
> > > #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1
> > > #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e
> > > #9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > >
> > > in __filemap_fdatawait_range
> > > wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> > > for the same page of the file
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7
> > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > > #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs]
> > > #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > > #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > > #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > > #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > >
> > > inode_lock(inode);
> > >
> > >
> > > and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is available
> > > (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory
> > > ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable
> > >
> > > [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4
> > > COMMAND: "ls"
> > > #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421
> > > #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2
> > > #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56
> > > #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c
> > > #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6
> > > #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > >
> > > in iterate_dir:
> > > if (shared)
> > > res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<<
> > > else
> > > res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
> > >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 13 +++++++-
> > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 3 +-
> > fs/cifs/file.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > index e4e3b573d20c..f8e201c45ccb 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ extern mempool_t *cifs_mid_poolp;
> >
> > struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> > struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> > +struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> > struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> > __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
> >
> > @@ -1557,11 +1558,18 @@ init_cifs(void)
> > goto out_destroy_cifsiod_wq;
> > }
> >
> > + fileinfo_put_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsfileinfoput",
> > + WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> > + if (!fileinfo_put_wq) {
> > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> > + }
> > +
> > cifsoplockd_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsoplockd",
> > WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> > if (!cifsoplockd_wq) {
> > rc = -ENOMEM;
> > - goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> > + goto out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq;
> > }
> >
> > rc = cifs_fscache_register();
> > @@ -1627,6 +1635,8 @@ init_cifs(void)
> > cifs_fscache_unregister();
> > out_destroy_cifsoplockd_wq:
> > destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> > +out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq:
> > + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> > out_destroy_decrypt_wq:
> > destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> > out_destroy_cifsiod_wq:
> > @@ -1656,6 +1666,7 @@ exit_cifs(void)
> > cifs_fscache_unregister();
> > destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> > destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> > + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> > destroy_workqueue(cifsiod_wq);
> > cifs_proc_clean();
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > index d78bfcc19156..0819b6498a3c 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > @@ -1265,6 +1265,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
> > struct mutex fh_mutex; /* prevents reopen race after dead ses*/
> > struct cifs_search_info srch_inf;
> > struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
> > + struct work_struct put; /* work for the final part of _put */
> > };
> >
> > struct cifs_io_parms {
> > @@ -1370,7 +1371,6 @@ cifsFileInfo_get_locked(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > }
> >
> > struct cifsFileInfo *cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> > -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_hdlr);
> > void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> >
> > #define CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG 1
> > @@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@ void cifs_queue_oplock_break(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile);
> > extern const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops;
> > extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> > extern struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> > +extern struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> > extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> > extern __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > index 67e7d0ffe385..d1dedb8fb31f 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > @@ -375,30 +375,7 @@ cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > return cifs_file;
> > }
> >
> > -/**
> > - * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > - *
> > - * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> > - */
> > -void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > -{
> > - _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true);
> > -}
> > -
> > -/**
> > - * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > - *
> > - * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> > - * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock and
> > - * cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> > - *
> > - * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> > - * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> > - * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> > - * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> > - *
> > - */
> > -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > +void cifsFileInfo_put_final(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > {
> > struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> > struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
> > @@ -409,7 +386,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
> > struct cifs_fid fid;
> > struct cifs_pending_open open;
> > - bool oplock_break_cancelled;
> >
> > spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> > spin_lock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> > @@ -449,9 +425,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > spin_unlock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> > spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> >
> > - oplock_break_cancelled = wait_oplock_handler ?
> > - cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break) : false;
> > -
> > if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
> > struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
> > unsigned int xid;
> > @@ -462,9 +435,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > _free_xid(xid);
> > }
> >
> > - if (oplock_break_cancelled)
> > - cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> > -
> > cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -487,6 +457,61 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > kfree(cifs_file);
> > }
> >
> > +static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file = container_of(work,
> > + struct cifsFileInfo, put);
> > +
> > + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > + *
> > + * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> > + * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock,
> > + * cinode->open_file_lock and cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> > + *
> > + * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> > + * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> > + * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> > + * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file,
> > + bool wait_oplock_handler, bool offload)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> > + struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > + if (cifs_file->count > 1) {
> > + cifs_file->count--;
> > + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > +
> > + if (wait_oplock_handler && cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break))
> > + cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
>
> At this point the file info is still in the lists and can be
> referenced by other threads not only including oplock break routine.
> So, we can't cancel oplock break here - it would lead to big timeouts
> to other clients trying to open the file because the server will be
> waiting for an oplock break ack.
>
> Let's do it in cifsFileInfo_put_final() as it was originally in
> cifsFileInfo_put() and we do not need an extra *wait_oplock_handler*
> argument - just cancel it unconditionally. If a caller of this
> function don't want to deadlock on himself (like cifs_oplock_break) it
> will just specify *offload* as True.
>
> > +
> > + if (offload) {
> > + INIT_WORK(&cifs_file->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
INIT_WORK should be done when initializing cifsFileInfo structure.
> > + queue_work(fileinfo_put_wq, &cifs_file->put);
As I mentioned in the parallel discussion queue_work here may return
False if the same work has been already queued. It may happen in the
following scenario:
T1 gets reference - 1
T1 is in putting the reference - checked ref > 1
T2 gets reference - 2
T1 queues work
T3 (worker) puts the reference - 1 but still didn't exit and remains
in the queue
T2 is in putting the reference - checked ref >1
T2 queues work and it returns false (!) <--- error
Sorry, it wasn't obvious to me when I was suggesting this yesterday.
One way to fix this is to check queue_work output and "goto" to the
beginning of the function if False. But there is always a probability
that we end up in the same situation and it repeats and repeats again.
I think it should resolve itself at some point in time but it doesn't
look like a good approach.
Another way to fix it is to revert the patch to the state it was at
yesterday - to offload only the remaining part of cifsFileInfo_put()
which will allow us to avoid the race from above. I am personally
leaning towards this way.
Other may comments about eliminating the need of *wait_oplock_handler*
and INIT_WORK stand for yesterday's patch too.
Thoughts?
> > + } else
> > + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > + *
> > + * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> > + */
> > +void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > +{
> > + _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> >
> > {
> > @@ -808,7 +833,7 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool can_flush)
> > int cifs_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > {
> > if (file->private_data != NULL) {
> > - cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data);
> > + _cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data, true, false);
> > file->private_data = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -4742,7 +4767,7 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
> > cinode);
> > cifs_dbg(FYI, "Oplock release rc = %d\n", rc);
> > }
> > - _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */);
> > + _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */, true);
>
> As mentioned above, here we only need *offload* as True to not wait
> for ourselves.
>
> > cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.13.6
> >
>
> Other than that, I think we the patch is on the right track. It should
> give us an opportunity to do file handle batching easily.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Pavel Shilovsky
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-30 16:56 ` Pavel Shilovsky
@ 2019-10-31 1:04 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-31 20:47 ` Pavel Shilovsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-31 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavel Shilovsky; +Cc: linux-cifs
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pavel Shilovsky" <piastryyy@gmail.com>
> To: "Ronnie Sahlberg" <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> Cc: "linux-cifs" <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, 31 October, 2019 2:56:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
>
> ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 08:46, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>:
> >
> > вт, 29 окт. 2019 г. в 19:59, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>:
> > >
> > > This patch moves the final part of the cifsFileInfo_put() logic where we
> > > need a write lock on lock_sem to be processed in a separate thread that
> > > holds no other locks.
> > > This is to prevent deadlocks like the one below:
> > >
> > > > there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write
> > > > cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from
> > > > cifs_new_fileinfo
> > > >
> > > > and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them
> > > > waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all
> > > > for the same page of the file
> > > >
> > > > 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file
> > > > 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page
> > > > 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > > > 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > > > 1 __lock_page
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > so processes are blocked waiting on:
> > > > page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page
> > > > inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > > > inode->i_rwsem for the file
> > > > cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide
> > > > anything more/better):
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > > > #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d
> > > > #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d
> > > > #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > > #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > > #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > * (I think legitimize_path is bogus)
> > > >
> > > > in path_openat
> > > > } else {
> > > > const char *s = path_init(nd, flags);
> > > > while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) &&
> > > > (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<<
> > > >
> > > > do_last:
> > > > if (open_flag & O_CREAT)
> > > > inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<<
> > > > else
> > > > so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > > >
> > > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > > > ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/
> > > > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0
> > > >
> > > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>:
> > > > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 -
> > > > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > > > waitlist: 2
> > > > 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0
> > > > 1:29:22.926
> > > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > > > 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0
> > > > 1:17:26.700
> > > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is:
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > > #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > > #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6
> > > > [cifs]
> > > > #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs]
> > > > #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs]
> > > > #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at
> > > > ffffffff9b04d4bd
> > > > #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339
> > > > [cifs]
> > > > #9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a
> > > > [cifs]
> > > > #10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs]
> > > > #11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7
> > > > #12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > > #13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > > #14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > >
> > > > cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > > >
> > > > crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > > > index = 0x8
> > > > mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0
> > > > flags = 0xfffffc0008095
> > > >
> > > > PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
> > > > PG_locked 0 0000001
> > > > PG_uptodate 2 0000004
> > > > PG_lru 4 0000010
> > > > PG_waiters 7 0000080
> > > > PG_writeback 15 0008000
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40
> > > > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0
> > > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > > > ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG
> > > > /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is
> > > > laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and
> > > > in
> > > > _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > > > for the file itself.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>:
> > > > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 -
> > > > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > > > waitlist: 1
> > > > 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0
> > > > 1:29:22.912
> > > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > > >
> > > > this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file
> > > >
> > > > the owner:
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > > > #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f
> > > > #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf
> > > > #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c
> > > > #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs]
> > > > #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4
> > > > #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a
> > > > #9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b
> > > > [cifs]
> > > > #10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > > > #11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > > > #12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > > > #13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > >
> > > > the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's
> > > > writing,
> > > > and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other
> > > > processes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the other tasks:
> > > > [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > > #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > > #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07
> > > > [cifs]
> > > > #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs]
> > > > #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a
> > > > #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f
> > > > #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > > #9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > > #10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > >
> > > > this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > > #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > > #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6
> > > > [cifs]
> > > > #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs]
> > > > #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e
> > > > #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614
> > > > #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f
> > > > #9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c
> > > >
> > > > closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > > > #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6
> > > > #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028
> > > > #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165
> > > > #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs]
> > > > #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1
> > > > #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e
> > > > #9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > >
> > > > in __filemap_fdatawait_range
> > > > wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> > > > for the same page of the file
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7
> > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > > > #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs]
> > > > #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > > > #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > > > #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > > > #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > >
> > > > inode_lock(inode);
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is
> > > > available
> > > > (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory
> > > > ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable
> > > >
> > > > [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4
> > > > COMMAND: "ls"
> > > > #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421
> > > > #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2
> > > > #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56
> > > > #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c
> > > > #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6
> > > > #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > >
> > > > in iterate_dir:
> > > > if (shared)
> > > > res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<<
> > > > else
> > > > res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
> > > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 13 +++++++-
> > > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 3 +-
> > > fs/cifs/file.c | 91
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > > 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > > index e4e3b573d20c..f8e201c45ccb 100644
> > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ extern mempool_t *cifs_mid_poolp;
> > >
> > > struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> > > struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> > > +struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> > > struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> > > __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
> > >
> > > @@ -1557,11 +1558,18 @@ init_cifs(void)
> > > goto out_destroy_cifsiod_wq;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + fileinfo_put_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsfileinfoput",
> > > +
> > > WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
> > > 0);
> > > + if (!fileinfo_put_wq) {
> > > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > > + goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > cifsoplockd_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsoplockd",
> > > WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> > > if (!cifsoplockd_wq) {
> > > rc = -ENOMEM;
> > > - goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> > > + goto out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq;
> > > }
> > >
> > > rc = cifs_fscache_register();
> > > @@ -1627,6 +1635,8 @@ init_cifs(void)
> > > cifs_fscache_unregister();
> > > out_destroy_cifsoplockd_wq:
> > > destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> > > +out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq:
> > > + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> > > out_destroy_decrypt_wq:
> > > destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> > > out_destroy_cifsiod_wq:
> > > @@ -1656,6 +1666,7 @@ exit_cifs(void)
> > > cifs_fscache_unregister();
> > > destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> > > destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> > > + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> > > destroy_workqueue(cifsiod_wq);
> > > cifs_proc_clean();
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > > index d78bfcc19156..0819b6498a3c 100644
> > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > > @@ -1265,6 +1265,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
> > > struct mutex fh_mutex; /* prevents reopen race after dead ses*/
> > > struct cifs_search_info srch_inf;
> > > struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
> > > + struct work_struct put; /* work for the final part of _put */
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct cifs_io_parms {
> > > @@ -1370,7 +1371,6 @@ cifsFileInfo_get_locked(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > *cifs_file)
> > > }
> > >
> > > struct cifsFileInfo *cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> > > -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool
> > > wait_oplock_hdlr);
> > > void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> > >
> > > #define CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG 1
> > > @@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@ void cifs_queue_oplock_break(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > *cfile);
> > > extern const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops;
> > > extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> > > extern struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> > > +extern struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> > > extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> > > extern __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > > index 67e7d0ffe385..d1dedb8fb31f 100644
> > > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > > @@ -375,30 +375,7 @@ cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > return cifs_file;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -/**
> > > - * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > - *
> > > - * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> > > - */
> > > -void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > -{
> > > - _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -/**
> > > - * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > - *
> > > - * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> > > - * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock and
> > > - * cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> > > - *
> > > - * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> > > - * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> > > - * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> > > - * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> > > - *
> > > - */
> > > -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool
> > > wait_oplock_handler)
> > > +void cifsFileInfo_put_final(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > {
> > > struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> > > struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
> > > @@ -409,7 +386,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
> > > struct cifs_fid fid;
> > > struct cifs_pending_open open;
> > > - bool oplock_break_cancelled;
> > >
> > > spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> > > spin_lock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> > > @@ -449,9 +425,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > spin_unlock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> > > spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> > >
> > > - oplock_break_cancelled = wait_oplock_handler ?
> > > - cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break) : false;
> > > -
> > > if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
> > > struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
> > > unsigned int xid;
> > > @@ -462,9 +435,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > _free_xid(xid);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (oplock_break_cancelled)
> > > - cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> > > -
> > > cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -487,6 +457,61 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > kfree(cifs_file);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > +{
> > > + struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file = container_of(work,
> > > + struct cifsFileInfo, put);
> > > +
> > > + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > + *
> > > + * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> > > + * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock,
> > > + * cinode->open_file_lock and cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> > > + *
> > > + * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> > > + * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> > > + * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> > > + * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file,
> > > + bool wait_oplock_handler, bool offload)
> > > +{
> > > + struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> > > + struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
> > > +
> > > + spin_lock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > > + if (cifs_file->count > 1) {
> > > + cifs_file->count--;
> > > + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (wait_oplock_handler &&
> > > cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break))
> > > + cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> >
> > At this point the file info is still in the lists and can be
> > referenced by other threads not only including oplock break routine.
> > So, we can't cancel oplock break here - it would lead to big timeouts
> > to other clients trying to open the file because the server will be
> > waiting for an oplock break ack.
> >
> > Let's do it in cifsFileInfo_put_final() as it was originally in
> > cifsFileInfo_put() and we do not need an extra *wait_oplock_handler*
> > argument - just cancel it unconditionally. If a caller of this
> > function don't want to deadlock on himself (like cifs_oplock_break) it
> > will just specify *offload* as True.
> >
> > > +
> > > + if (offload) {
> > > + INIT_WORK(&cifs_file->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
>
> INIT_WORK should be done when initializing cifsFileInfo structure.
>
>
> > > + queue_work(fileinfo_put_wq, &cifs_file->put);
>
> As I mentioned in the parallel discussion queue_work here may return
> False if the same work has been already queued. It may happen in the
> following scenario:
>
> T1 gets reference - 1
> T1 is in putting the reference - checked ref > 1
> T2 gets reference - 2
> T1 queues work
> T3 (worker) puts the reference - 1 but still didn't exit and remains
> in the queue
> T2 is in putting the reference - checked ref >1
> T2 queues work and it returns false (!) <--- error
>
> Sorry, it wasn't obvious to me when I was suggesting this yesterday.
>
> One way to fix this is to check queue_work output and "goto" to the
> beginning of the function if False. But there is always a probability
> that we end up in the same situation and it repeats and repeats again.
> I think it should resolve itself at some point in time but it doesn't
> look like a good approach.
>
> Another way to fix it is to revert the patch to the state it was at
> yesterday - to offload only the remaining part of cifsFileInfo_put()
> which will allow us to avoid the race from above. I am personally
> leaning towards this way.
I think so too.
Can you do the changes below (wait_oplock_handler/INIT_WORK) to yesterday's patch for how you want them to look like and send it to the list?
>
> Other may comments about eliminating the need of *wait_oplock_handler*
> and INIT_WORK stand for yesterday's patch too.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> > > + } else
> > > + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > + *
> > > + * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> > > + */
> > > +void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > +{
> > > + _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true, true);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int cifs_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > >
> > > {
> > > @@ -808,7 +833,7 @@ cifs_reopen_file(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, bool
> > > can_flush)
> > > int cifs_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > > {
> > > if (file->private_data != NULL) {
> > > - cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data);
> > > + _cifsFileInfo_put(file->private_data, true, false);
> > > file->private_data = NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -4742,7 +4767,7 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work)
> > > cinode);
> > > cifs_dbg(FYI, "Oplock release rc = %d\n", rc);
> > > }
> > > - _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */);
> > > + _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile, false /* do not wait for ourself */,
> > > true);
> >
> > As mentioned above, here we only need *offload* as True to not wait
> > for ourselves.
> >
> > > cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode);
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.13.6
> > >
> >
> > Other than that, I think we the patch is on the right track. It should
> > give us an opportunity to do file handle batching easily.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Pavel Shilovsky
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-31 1:04 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-31 20:47 ` Pavel Shilovsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2019-10-31 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg; +Cc: linux-cifs
ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 18:04, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>:
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pavel Shilovsky" <piastryyy@gmail.com>
> > To: "Ronnie Sahlberg" <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "linux-cifs" <linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, 31 October, 2019 2:56:11 AM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
> >
> > ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 08:46, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > вт, 29 окт. 2019 г. в 19:59, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>:
> > > >
> > > > This patch moves the final part of the cifsFileInfo_put() logic where we
> > > > need a write lock on lock_sem to be processed in a separate thread that
> > > > holds no other locks.
> > > > This is to prevent deadlocks like the one below:
> > > >
> > > > > there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write
> > > > > cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from
> > > > > cifs_new_fileinfo
> > > > >
> > > > > and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them
> > > > > waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all
> > > > > for the same page of the file
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file
> > > > > 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page
> > > > > 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > > > > 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> > > > > 1 __lock_page
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > so processes are blocked waiting on:
> > > > > page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page
> > > > > inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > > > > inode->i_rwsem for the file
> > > > > cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide
> > > > > anything more/better):
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > > > > #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d
> > > > > #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d
> > > > > #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > > > #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > > > #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > > * (I think legitimize_path is bogus)
> > > > >
> > > > > in path_openat
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > const char *s = path_init(nd, flags);
> > > > > while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) &&
> > > > > (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<<
> > > > >
> > > > > do_last:
> > > > > if (open_flag & O_CREAT)
> > > > > inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<<
> > > > > else
> > > > > so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> > > > >
> > > > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > > > > ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/
> > > > > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0
> > > > >
> > > > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>:
> > > > > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 -
> > > > > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > > > > waitlist: 2
> > > > > 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0
> > > > > 1:29:22.926
> > > > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > > > > 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0
> > > > > 1:17:26.700
> > > > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is:
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > > > #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > > > #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6
> > > > > [cifs]
> > > > > #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs]
> > > > > #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs]
> > > > > #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at
> > > > > ffffffff9b04d4bd
> > > > > #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339
> > > > > [cifs]
> > > > > #9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a
> > > > > [cifs]
> > > > > #10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs]
> > > > > #11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7
> > > > > #12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > > > #13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > > > #14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > >
> > > > > cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > > > >
> > > > > crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> > > > > index = 0x8
> > > > > mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0
> > > > > flags = 0xfffffc0008095
> > > > >
> > > > > PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
> > > > > PG_locked 0 0000001
> > > > > PG_uptodate 2 0000004
> > > > > PG_lru 4 0000010
> > > > > PG_waiters 7 0000080
> > > > > PG_writeback 15 0008000
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40
> > > > > inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0
> > > > > DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> > > > > ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG
> > > > > /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is
> > > > > laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and
> > > > > in
> > > > > _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInflock_sem
> > > > > for the file itself.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>:
> > > > > owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 -
> > > > > reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> > > > > waitlist: 1
> > > > > 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0
> > > > > 1:29:22.912
> > > > > RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> > > > >
> > > > > this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file
> > > > >
> > > > > the owner:
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > > > > #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f
> > > > > #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf
> > > > > #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c
> > > > > #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs]
> > > > > #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4
> > > > > #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a
> > > > > #9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b
> > > > > [cifs]
> > > > > #10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > > > > #11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > > > > #12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > > > > #13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > >
> > > > > the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's
> > > > > writing,
> > > > > and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other
> > > > > processes
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the other tasks:
> > > > > [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > > > #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > > > #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07
> > > > > [cifs]
> > > > > #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs]
> > > > > #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a
> > > > > #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f
> > > > > #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> > > > > #9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> > > > > #10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > >
> > > > > this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> > > > > #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> > > > > #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6
> > > > > [cifs]
> > > > > #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs]
> > > > > #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e
> > > > > #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614
> > > > > #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f
> > > > > #9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c
> > > > >
> > > > > closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> > > > > #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6
> > > > > #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028
> > > > > #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165
> > > > > #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs]
> > > > > #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1
> > > > > #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e
> > > > > #9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > >
> > > > > in __filemap_fdatawait_range
> > > > > wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> > > > > for the same page of the file
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7
> > > > > COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> > > > > #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> > > > > #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs]
> > > > > #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> > > > > #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> > > > > #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> > > > > #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > >
> > > > > inode_lock(inode);
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is
> > > > > available
> > > > > (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory
> > > > > ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable
> > > > >
> > > > > [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4
> > > > > COMMAND: "ls"
> > > > > #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> > > > > #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> > > > > #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421
> > > > > #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2
> > > > > #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56
> > > > > #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c
> > > > > #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6
> > > > > #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> > > > >
> > > > > in iterate_dir:
> > > > > if (shared)
> > > > > res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<<
> > > > > else
> > > > > res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 13 +++++++-
> > > > fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 3 +-
> > > > fs/cifs/file.c | 91
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > > > 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > > > index e4e3b573d20c..f8e201c45ccb 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > > > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ extern mempool_t *cifs_mid_poolp;
> > > >
> > > > struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> > > > struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> > > > +struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> > > > struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> > > > __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -1557,11 +1558,18 @@ init_cifs(void)
> > > > goto out_destroy_cifsiod_wq;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + fileinfo_put_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsfileinfoput",
> > > > +
> > > > WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
> > > > 0);
> > > > + if (!fileinfo_put_wq) {
> > > > + rc = -ENOMEM;
> > > > + goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > cifsoplockd_wq = alloc_workqueue("cifsoplockd",
> > > > WQ_FREEZABLE|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> > > > if (!cifsoplockd_wq) {
> > > > rc = -ENOMEM;
> > > > - goto out_destroy_decrypt_wq;
> > > > + goto out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > rc = cifs_fscache_register();
> > > > @@ -1627,6 +1635,8 @@ init_cifs(void)
> > > > cifs_fscache_unregister();
> > > > out_destroy_cifsoplockd_wq:
> > > > destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> > > > +out_destroy_fileinfo_put_wq:
> > > > + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> > > > out_destroy_decrypt_wq:
> > > > destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> > > > out_destroy_cifsiod_wq:
> > > > @@ -1656,6 +1666,7 @@ exit_cifs(void)
> > > > cifs_fscache_unregister();
> > > > destroy_workqueue(cifsoplockd_wq);
> > > > destroy_workqueue(decrypt_wq);
> > > > + destroy_workqueue(fileinfo_put_wq);
> > > > destroy_workqueue(cifsiod_wq);
> > > > cifs_proc_clean();
> > > > }
> > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > > > index d78bfcc19156..0819b6498a3c 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> > > > @@ -1265,6 +1265,7 @@ struct cifsFileInfo {
> > > > struct mutex fh_mutex; /* prevents reopen race after dead ses*/
> > > > struct cifs_search_info srch_inf;
> > > > struct work_struct oplock_break; /* work for oplock breaks */
> > > > + struct work_struct put; /* work for the final part of _put */
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > struct cifs_io_parms {
> > > > @@ -1370,7 +1371,6 @@ cifsFileInfo_get_locked(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > > *cifs_file)
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > struct cifsFileInfo *cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> > > > -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool
> > > > wait_oplock_hdlr);
> > > > void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file);
> > > >
> > > > #define CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG 1
> > > > @@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@ void cifs_queue_oplock_break(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > > *cfile);
> > > > extern const struct slow_work_ops cifs_oplock_break_ops;
> > > > extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsiod_wq;
> > > > extern struct workqueue_struct *decrypt_wq;
> > > > +extern struct workqueue_struct *fileinfo_put_wq;
> > > > extern struct workqueue_struct *cifsoplockd_wq;
> > > > extern __u32 cifs_lock_secret;
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > > > index 67e7d0ffe385..d1dedb8fb31f 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> > > > @@ -375,30 +375,7 @@ cifsFileInfo_get(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > > return cifs_file;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -/**
> > > > - * cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > > - *
> > > > - * Always potentially wait for oplock handler. See _cifsFileInfo_put().
> > > > - */
> > > > -void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > > -{
> > > > - _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true);
> > > > -}
> > > > -
> > > > -/**
> > > > - * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > > - *
> > > > - * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> > > > - * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock and
> > > > - * cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> > > > - *
> > > > - * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> > > > - * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> > > > - * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> > > > - * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> > > > - *
> > > > - */
> > > > -void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file, bool
> > > > wait_oplock_handler)
> > > > +void cifsFileInfo_put_final(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
> > > > {
> > > > struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> > > > struct cifs_tcon *tcon = tlink_tcon(cifs_file->tlink);
> > > > @@ -409,7 +386,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > > struct cifsLockInfo *li, *tmp;
> > > > struct cifs_fid fid;
> > > > struct cifs_pending_open open;
> > > > - bool oplock_break_cancelled;
> > > >
> > > > spin_lock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> > > > spin_lock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> > > > @@ -449,9 +425,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > > spin_unlock(&cifsi->open_file_lock);
> > > > spin_unlock(&tcon->open_file_lock);
> > > >
> > > > - oplock_break_cancelled = wait_oplock_handler ?
> > > > - cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break) : false;
> > > > -
> > > > if (!tcon->need_reconnect && !cifs_file->invalidHandle) {
> > > > struct TCP_Server_Info *server = tcon->ses->server;
> > > > unsigned int xid;
> > > > @@ -462,9 +435,6 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > > _free_xid(xid);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - if (oplock_break_cancelled)
> > > > - cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> > > > -
> > > > cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > @@ -487,6 +457,61 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo
> > > > *cifs_file, bool wait_oplock_handler)
> > > > kfree(cifs_file);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file = container_of(work,
> > > > + struct cifsFileInfo, put);
> > > > +
> > > > + cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * _cifsFileInfo_put - release a reference of file priv data
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This may involve closing the filehandle @cifs_file out on the
> > > > + * server. Must be called without holding tcon->open_file_lock,
> > > > + * cinode->open_file_lock and cifs_file->file_info_lock.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If @wait_for_oplock_handler is true and we are releasing the last
> > > > + * reference, wait for any running oplock break handler of the file
> > > > + * and cancel any pending one. If calling this function from the
> > > > + * oplock break handler, you need to pass false.
> > > > + *
> > > > + */
> > > > +void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file,
> > > > + bool wait_oplock_handler, bool offload)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct inode *inode = d_inode(cifs_file->dentry);
> > > > + struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi = CIFS_I(inode);
> > > > +
> > > > + spin_lock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > > > + if (cifs_file->count > 1) {
> > > > + cifs_file->count--;
> > > > + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > + spin_unlock(&cifs_file->file_info_lock);
> > > > +
> > > > + if (wait_oplock_handler &&
> > > > cancel_work_sync(&cifs_file->oplock_break))
> > > > + cifs_done_oplock_break(cifsi);
> > >
> > > At this point the file info is still in the lists and can be
> > > referenced by other threads not only including oplock break routine.
> > > So, we can't cancel oplock break here - it would lead to big timeouts
> > > to other clients trying to open the file because the server will be
> > > waiting for an oplock break ack.
> > >
> > > Let's do it in cifsFileInfo_put_final() as it was originally in
> > > cifsFileInfo_put() and we do not need an extra *wait_oplock_handler*
> > > argument - just cancel it unconditionally. If a caller of this
> > > function don't want to deadlock on himself (like cifs_oplock_break) it
> > > will just specify *offload* as True.
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + if (offload) {
> > > > + INIT_WORK(&cifs_file->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
> >
> > INIT_WORK should be done when initializing cifsFileInfo structure.
> >
> >
> > > > + queue_work(fileinfo_put_wq, &cifs_file->put);
> >
> > As I mentioned in the parallel discussion queue_work here may return
> > False if the same work has been already queued. It may happen in the
> > following scenario:
> >
> > T1 gets reference - 1
> > T1 is in putting the reference - checked ref > 1
> > T2 gets reference - 2
> > T1 queues work
> > T3 (worker) puts the reference - 1 but still didn't exit and remains
> > in the queue
> > T2 is in putting the reference - checked ref >1
> > T2 queues work and it returns false (!) <--- error
> >
> > Sorry, it wasn't obvious to me when I was suggesting this yesterday.
> >
> > One way to fix this is to check queue_work output and "goto" to the
> > beginning of the function if False. But there is always a probability
> > that we end up in the same situation and it repeats and repeats again.
> > I think it should resolve itself at some point in time but it doesn't
> > look like a good approach.
> >
> > Another way to fix it is to revert the patch to the state it was at
> > yesterday - to offload only the remaining part of cifsFileInfo_put()
> > which will allow us to avoid the race from above. I am personally
> > leaning towards this way.
>
> I think so too.
> Can you do the changes below (wait_oplock_handler/INIT_WORK) to yesterday's patch for how you want them to look like and send it to the list?
We can leave wait_oplock_handler cleanup for a follow-on work. As for
INIT_WORK, please find a fix (on top of your patch) below. It
basically does the same as we do for cifs_oplock_break work today.
-----------------------------
diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 309d6948d2f4..3b077074cc1f 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ cifs_down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
msleep(10);
}
+static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work);
+
struct cifsFileInfo *
cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
struct tcon_link *tlink, __u32 oplock)
@@ -325,6 +327,7 @@ cifs_new_fileinfo(struct cifs_fid *fid, struct file *file,
cfile->invalidHandle = false;
cfile->tlink = cifs_get_tlink(tlink);
INIT_WORK(&cfile->oplock_break, cifs_oplock_break);
+ INIT_WORK(&cfile->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
mutex_init(&cfile->fh_mutex);
spin_lock_init(&cfile->file_info_lock);
@@ -417,7 +420,7 @@ static void cifsFileInfo_put_work(struct work_struct *work)
*/
void cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file)
{
- _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true, true);
+ _cifsFileInfo_put(cifs_file, true, true);
}
/**
@@ -502,10 +505,9 @@ void _cifsFileInfo_put(struct cifsFileInfo *cifs_file,
cifs_del_pending_open(&open);
- if (offload) {
- INIT_WORK(&cifs_file->put, cifsFileInfo_put_work);
+ if (offload)
queue_work(fileinfo_put_wq, &cifs_file->put);
- } else
+ else
cifsFileInfo_put_final(cifs_file);
}
-----------------------------
Other than that, I think the patch is good to go. Once you fix the
above, please feel free to add my
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Thanks for fixing this problem!
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
@ 2019-10-29 3:13 Ronnie Sahlberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-29 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs
Pavel,
Please see version 2 addressing your review comments.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-27 23:52 ` Frank Sorenson
@ 2019-10-28 22:51 ` Pavel Shilovsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Shilovsky @ 2019-10-28 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Sorenson; +Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg, linux-cifs
пн, 28 окт. 2019 г. в 05:13, Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>:
>
> On 10/26/19 4:04 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> > Steve, Pavel, Frank
> >
> > This patch moves the logic in cifsFileInfo_put() into a work-queue so that
> > it will be processed in a different thread which, importantly, does not hold
> > any other locks.
> >
> > This should address the deadlock that Frank reported in the thread:
> > Yet another hang after network disruption or smb restart -- multiple file writers
>
> Pavel,
>
> Thanks for understanding my report and translating it into what it meant.
>
> Ronnie,
> Thanks for the patch. I'm happy to say that my attempt at the same
> looks like it would have been similar, had I known what I was doing to
> begin with :)
>
>
> Unfortunately, I think the patch really only moves the problem from one
> place to another. I'm guessing that means we have a second underlying
> deadlock. (this reproducer appears to be quite effective)
>
>
> On the plus side, only the one file involved is jammed in the deadlock
> now, as opposed to the parent directory as well, so it is at least progress.
>
Hi Frank, Ronnie,
Ok, it seems there is another bug resulting in a deadlock between a
page lock and writeback (WB) flag in cifs_writev_complete and
cifs_writepages.
1) cifs_writev_complete. in the case of WB_SYNC_ALL and EAGAIN
(reconnect) it calls cifs_writev_requeue. At this point it still has
WB flag set for all the pages being retried. Inside
cifs_writev_requeue it tries to lock the page:
kworker/4:3+cifsiod
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 __lock_page at ffffffffaae3f66f
#4 cifs_writev_complete at ffffffffc07df762
#5 process_one_work at ffffffffaacecc11
#6 worker_thread at ffffffffaaced0f0
#7 kthread at ffffffffaacf2ac2
#8 ret_from_fork at ffffffffab600215
2) cifs_writepages. It locks the page and then waits on WB flag to be
cleared before processing pages:
1 openloop.sh
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 wait_on_page_bit at ffffffffaae3fbc6
#4 cifs_writepages at ffffffffc07ffc73
#5 do_writepages at ffffffffaae4ba71
#6 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffaae4321b
#7 filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffffaae432aa
#8 cifs_flush at ffffffffc0800fe3
#9 filp_close at ffffffffaaeed181
#10 do_dup2 at ffffffffaaf12c0b
#11 __x64_sys_dup2 at ffffffffaaf1306a
#12 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
The bug is in cifs_writev_complete and cifs_writev_requeue: the 1st
needs to clear the WB flag and re-dirty pages before trying to retry
the IO; the 2nd needs additionally to skip pages that are no longer
dirty (e.g. written by another thread) and re-set the WB flag before
sending pages over the wire.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
2019-10-26 21:04 Ronnie Sahlberg
@ 2019-10-27 23:52 ` Frank Sorenson
2019-10-28 22:51 ` Pavel Shilovsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Frank Sorenson @ 2019-10-27 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronnie Sahlberg, linux-cifs
On 10/26/19 4:04 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> Steve, Pavel, Frank
>
> This patch moves the logic in cifsFileInfo_put() into a work-queue so that
> it will be processed in a different thread which, importantly, does not hold
> any other locks.
>
> This should address the deadlock that Frank reported in the thread:
> Yet another hang after network disruption or smb restart -- multiple file writers
Pavel,
Thanks for understanding my report and translating it into what it meant.
Ronnie,
Thanks for the patch. I'm happy to say that my attempt at the same
looks like it would have been similar, had I known what I was doing to
begin with :)
Unfortunately, I think the patch really only moves the problem from one
place to another. I'm guessing that means we have a second underlying
deadlock. (this reproducer appears to be quite effective)
On the plus side, only the one file involved is jammed in the deadlock
now, as opposed to the parent directory as well, so it is at least progress.
#!/bin/bash
testfile=testfile
openloop() {
while true ; do
exec 10<>$testfile
<&10 >/dev/null
echo "testing $$" >&10
exec 10>&-
done
}
for i in {1..50} ; do
openloop &
done
wait
and on the server (once):
# systemctl restart smb.service
(or anything else which forces a reconnect)
After doing the above with 20 child processes, all are now blocked, as
are 3 cifsfileinfoput kworkers, a cifsiod kworker, and a flush-cifs kworker:
# ps x | awk '{if (substr($3, 1, 1) == "D"){print $3,$NF}}' | sort |
uniq -c | sort -rn
20 D /var/tmp/openloop.sh
1 D [kworker/u16:9+cifsfileinfoput]
1 D [kworker/u16:8+cifsfileinfoput]
1 D [kworker/u16:25+flush-cifs-1]
1 D [kworker/u16:19+cifsfileinfoput]
1 D [kworker/4:3+cifsiod]
12 of the openloop.sh processes:
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffffaad29a47
#3 cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc08010e2
#4 new_sync_write at ffffffffaaeeff6d
#5 vfs_write at ffffffffaaef2ac5
#6 ksys_write at ffffffffaaef2d69
#7 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
in cifs_strict_writev:
inode_lock(inode);
3 openloop.sh:
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffab4f5949
#3 msleep at ffffffffaad58d89
#4 cifs_down_write at ffffffffc07fa2b5
#5 cifs_new_fileinfo at ffffffffc07fa392
#6 cifs_open at ffffffffc07fae1f
#7 do_dentry_open at ffffffffaaeed90a
#8 path_openat at ffffffffaaf0204a
#9 do_filp_open at ffffffffaaf04753
#10 do_sys_open at ffffffffaaeef066
#11 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
3 openloop.sh
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 wait_on_page_bit at ffffffffaae3fbc6
#4 __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffffaae3e158
#5 filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffffaae432c5
#6 cifs_flush at ffffffffc0800fe3
#7 filp_close at ffffffffaaeed181
#8 do_dup2 at ffffffffaaf12c0b
#9 __x64_sys_dup2 at ffffffffaaf1306a
#10 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
in __filemap_fdatawait_range:
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
1 openloop.sh
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 wait_on_page_bit at ffffffffaae3fbc6
#4 cifs_writepages at ffffffffc07ffc73
#5 do_writepages at ffffffffaae4ba71
#6 __filemap_fdatawrite_range at ffffffffaae4321b
#7 filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffffaae432aa
#8 cifs_flush at ffffffffc0800fe3
#9 filp_close at ffffffffaaeed181
#10 do_dup2 at ffffffffaaf12c0b
#11 __x64_sys_dup2 at ffffffffaaf1306a
#12 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
in cifs_writepages, we're really in wdata_prepare_pages
if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_NONE)
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
1 openloop.sh
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 __lock_page at ffffffffaae3f66f
#4 pagecache_get_page at ffffffffaae40ddf
#5 grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffffaae420ac
#6 cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc07f9ea9
#7 generic_perform_write at ffffffffaae3eca4
#8 __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffffaae4376a
#9 cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc08011cf
#10 new_sync_write at ffffffffaaeeff6d
#11 vfs_write at ffffffffaaef2ac5
#12 ksys_write at ffffffffaaef2d69
#13 do_syscall_64 at ffffffffaac04345
kworker/u16:8+cifsfileinfoput
kworker/u16:19+cifsfileinfoput
kworker/u16:9+cifsfileinfoput
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 schedule_timeout at ffffffffab4f5949
#3 msleep at ffffffffaad58d89
#4 cifs_down_write at ffffffffc07fa2b5
#5 _cifsFileInfo_put_work at ffffffffc07fb687
#6 cifsFileInfo_put_work at ffffffffc07fd816
#7 process_one_work at ffffffffaacecc11
#8 worker_thread at ffffffffaaced0f0
#9 kthread at ffffffffaacf2ac2
#10 ret_from_fork at ffffffffab600215
kworker/4:3+cifsiod
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 __lock_page at ffffffffaae3f66f
#4 cifs_writev_complete at ffffffffc07df762
#5 process_one_work at ffffffffaacecc11
#6 worker_thread at ffffffffaaced0f0
#7 kthread at ffffffffaacf2ac2
#8 ret_from_fork at ffffffffab600215
kworker/u16:25+flush-cifs-1
#0 __schedule at ffffffffab4f1a45
#1 schedule at ffffffffab4f1ea0
#2 io_schedule at ffffffffab4f22a2
#3 __lock_page at ffffffffaae3f66f
#4 cifs_writepages at ffffffffc07ffcbe
#5 do_writepages at ffffffffaae4ba71
#6 __writeback_single_inode at ffffffffaaf25bdd
#7 writeback_sb_inodes at ffffffffaaf26315
#8 __writeback_inodes_wb at ffffffffaaf2660d
#9 wb_writeback at ffffffffaaf2698f
#10 wb_workfn at ffffffffaaf279cf
#11 process_one_work at ffffffffaacecc11
#12 worker_thread at ffffffffaaced0f0
#13 kthread at ffffffffaacf2ac2
#14 ret_from_fork at ffffffffab600215
the page which processes are either trying to lock or are waiting on
writeback:
FLAGS: fffffc000809d
PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
PG_locked 0 0000001
PG_uptodate 2 0000004
PG_dirty 3 0000008
PG_lru 4 0000010
PG_waiters 7 0000080
PG_writeback 15 0008000
PG_savepinned 3 0000008
Frank
--
Frank Sorenson
sorenson@redhat.com
Principal Software Maintenance Engineer
Global Support Services - filesystems
Red Hat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue
@ 2019-10-26 21:04 Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-27 23:52 ` Frank Sorenson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ronnie Sahlberg @ 2019-10-26 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-cifs
Steve, Pavel, Frank
This patch moves the logic in cifsFileInfo_put() into a work-queue so that
it will be processed in a different thread which, importantly, does not hold
any other locks.
This should address the deadlock that Frank reported in the thread:
Yet another hang after network disruption or smb restart -- multiple file writers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-31 20:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-30 2:59 [PATCH 0/1] cifs: move cifsFileInfo_put logic into a work-queue Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-30 2:59 ` [PATCH] " Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-30 15:46 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-30 16:56 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2019-10-31 1:04 ` Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-31 20:47 ` Pavel Shilovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-29 3:13 [PATCH 0/1] " Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-26 21:04 Ronnie Sahlberg
2019-10-27 23:52 ` Frank Sorenson
2019-10-28 22:51 ` Pavel Shilovsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).