linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>,
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@cjr.nz>,
	Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 14/15] cifs: revalidate mapping when we open files for SMB1 POSIX
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 18:23:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210329222327.2383533-14-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329222327.2383533-1-sashal@kernel.org>

From: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit cee8f4f6fcabfdf229542926128e9874d19016d5 ]

RHBZ: 1933527

Under SMB1 + POSIX, if an inode is reused on a server after we have read and
cached a part of a file, when we then open the new file with the
re-cycled inode there is a chance that we may serve the old data out of cache
to the application.
This only happens for SMB1 (deprecated) and when posix are used.
The simplest solution to avoid this race is to force a revalidate
on smb1-posix open.

Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@cjr.nz>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/cifs/file.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 5cb15649adb0..7b482489bd22 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ int cifs_posix_open(char *full_path, struct inode **pinode,
 			goto posix_open_ret;
 		}
 	} else {
+		cifs_revalidate_mapping(*pinode);
 		cifs_fattr_to_inode(*pinode, &fattr);
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.1


       reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20210329222327.2383533-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-29 22:23 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2021-03-29 22:23 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 15/15] cifs: Silently ignore unknown oplock break handle Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210329222327.2383533-14-sashal@kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsahlber@redhat.com \
    --cc=pc@cjr.nz \
    --cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).