From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0EAC433EF for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B9661A35 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351222AbhITST5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:19:57 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:39827 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1347357AbhITSRr (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:17:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1632161780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=smgGeNTJKJdRB3jySjdLq/O6aIDEticWWn8WNZpB814=; b=YuzYaMpkaJ4+hcmiSIGX+WLg+FrxfFxmsxQm/ktdsnP/BzzcfcBcpTS4DM7jtd3dhsYvv+ rAe1GcG5MJWgxqwQTaINACBqzJmBKfcmnOmA0KbogN1Gv4Z5hgvDmYC68lQWEBgVHcTS7l kuoC+MOzcpDhniydyD7dcl8h7q+dKVA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-338-V_dpYbo3NfOmkZRcCVpp8Q-1; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:16:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: V_dpYbo3NfOmkZRcCVpp8Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467EE802936; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.33.36.44]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687BB19724; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <163214005516.2945267.7000234432243167892.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Steve French Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel , Jeff Layton , Dominique Martinet , Marc Dionne , Steve French , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, CIFS , linux-nfs , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2976711.1632161773.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:16:13 +0100 Message-ID: <2976712.1632161773@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Steve French wrote: > For the cifs ones in connect.c (and also ioctl.c), I had submitted a > patch in rc1 for these (haven't heard back on that) but did not submit > kerneldoc fixup for fs/cifs/misc.c. They seem trivial and safe, do > you want to split those out and I can put them in? I can, though the reason I did the patch is that the warnings are always popping up in what I'm doing. I can drop the patch from mine when I'm done, I guess. David