Hi Namjae, thanks! One nitpick below. Am 19.09.21 um 04:13 schrieb Namjae Jeon: > From: Hyunchul Lee > > Add buffer validation for SMB2_CREATE_CONTEXT. > > Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg > Cc: Ralph Böhme > Cc: Steve French > Signed-off-by: Hyunchul Lee > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon > --- > fs/ksmbd/oplock.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > fs/ksmbd/smbacl.c | 9 ++++++++- > 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c b/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c > index 16b6236d1bd2..3fd2713f2282 100644 > --- a/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c > +++ b/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c > @@ -1451,26 +1451,41 @@ struct lease_ctx_info *parse_lease_state(void *open_req) > */ > struct create_context *smb2_find_context_vals(void *open_req, const char *tag) > { > - char *data_offset; > + struct smb2_create_req *req = (struct smb2_create_req *)open_req; > struct create_context *cc; > - unsigned int next = 0; > + char *data_offset, *data_end; > char *name; > - struct smb2_create_req *req = (struct smb2_create_req *)open_req; > + unsigned int next = 0; > + unsigned int name_off, name_len, value_off, value_len; > > data_offset = (char *)req + 4 + le32_to_cpu(req->CreateContextsOffset); > + data_end = data_offset + le32_to_cpu(req->CreateContextsLength); > cc = (struct create_context *)data_offset; > do { > - int val; > - > cc = (struct create_context *)((char *)cc + next); > - name = le16_to_cpu(cc->NameOffset) + (char *)cc; > - val = le16_to_cpu(cc->NameLength); > - if (val < 4) > + if ((char *)cc + offsetof(struct create_context, Buffer) > > + data_end) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > - if (memcmp(name, tag, val) == 0) > - return cc; > next = le32_to_cpu(cc->Next); > + name_off = le16_to_cpu(cc->NameOffset); > + name_len = le16_to_cpu(cc->NameLength); > + value_off = le16_to_cpu(cc->DataOffset); > + value_len = le32_to_cpu(cc->DataLength); > + > + if ((char *)cc + name_off + name_len > data_end || > + (value_len && (char *)cc + value_off + value_len > data_end)) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + else if (next && (next < name_off + name_len || > + (value_len && next < value_off + value_len))) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); The else is a bit confusing and not needed. Also, Samba has a few additional checks, I wonder whether we should add those two: if ((next & 0x7) != 0 || next > remaining || name_offset != 16 || name_length < 4 || name_offset + name_length > remaining || (data_offset & 0x7) != 0 || (data_offset && (data_offset < name_offset + name_length)) || (data_offset > remaining) || (data_offset + (uint64_t)data_length > remaining)) { return NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER; } Other then that lgtm. Thanks! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Team Lead https://sernet.de/en/team-samba