From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A5DC282DD for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D8C2072A for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cjr.nz header.i=@cjr.nz header.b="dsk7vEUU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728435AbgAINGp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:06:45 -0500 Received: from mx.cjr.nz ([51.158.111.142]:40934 "EHLO mx.cjr.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730471AbgAINGp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 08:06:45 -0500 Received: from authenticated-user (mx.cjr.nz [51.158.111.142]) (Authenticated sender: pc) by mx.cjr.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAF9E808C0; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:06:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cjr.nz; s=dkim; t=1578575203; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sZasYUESR4DSh0lVK71V9TVjOHaoB9cH6O288Vq1hBM=; b=dsk7vEUUIeB8blQoqvqhwh3A6qV+S6SS0+PIT+980dLp+xJTIqxy6XcbSTTehUncGygyrj rpwZoQPn3q0sYF0UPRjOpx3Ln1/AdRD5CAa3TYFEbqkjWxAxEIACY69rNTyt6p9cfSPs28 U6SqOHip0JuLbMeJcUwl15xlT40KpNuKQ9twUY32wdlSxoy2klLE0O48MEZmgpqyzeUDUY 1hC5bjnDZmmIQbGMYjLDj9bF+dSGc/iuT/7vG7GjzXFKyn9A5YodMCwjjZZnstPk9hyWDL 9Hj1P+wzumc52nSE1jazsAIs/tXsEnUpVemuKjkfKRkL561riy5EkFQzKksiTQ== From: Paulo Alcantara To: Martijn de Gouw , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: cifs.upcall requests ticket for wrong host when using dfs In-Reply-To: <3ddf0683-0213-1c43-bcc7-cfc3cb8bc28b@prodrive-technologies.com> References: <39643d7d-2abb-14d3-ced6-c394fab9a777@prodrive-technologies.com> <87png0boej.fsf@cjr.nz> <5260c45c-0a31-168d-f9db-83bb6bd4a2cf@prodrive-technologies.com> <878smoqouf.fsf@cjr.nz> <87k16417ud.fsf@cjr.nz> <87y2uh264k.fsf@cjr.nz> <3ddf0683-0213-1c43-bcc7-cfc3cb8bc28b@prodrive-technologies.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:06:40 -0300 Message-ID: <871rs8eq3j.fsf@cjr.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Hi Martijn, Martijn de Gouw writes: > Yes, so far so good. Thanks a lot for the quick response! Not a trivial > patch as far I as i can judge. Cool! Thanks for the confirmation. Just sent a patch with this fix, BTW. > Also the machine we have running with your other DFS patches is running > for 8 weeks now and survived several relocations of our dfs shares and > adding/removal of DCs! > > Is there any news on the acceptance of your [PATCH v4 0/6] DFS fixes? I don't have any news, but I'll talk to Steve and Aurelien about them. Thanks, Paulo