From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1EFC07E99 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B7561363 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232201AbhGIOxo (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:53:44 -0400 Received: from mx.cjr.nz ([51.158.111.142]:22514 "EHLO mx.cjr.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231921AbhGIOxo (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jul 2021 10:53:44 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (mx.cjr.nz [51.158.111.142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pc) by mx.cjr.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA7627FD1E; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 14:50:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cjr.nz; s=dkim; t=1625842259; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+VLcWzFemZtnzUvg3rGPfg2QONoobY+n6twyK7ucax4=; b=Snhh67w9Z1/oyBgB06OKpZIzLXVn5H3EbigD7X6jOTzIADJ4axGm/ol7wTtRWkDo57W/Xl T1M/+n4+wl5F/OdFrR3VICAvHkJM5zl5EuZ+ivYD3dIeaLll/XJPOkjssuXzr5ol626yHz LFyCFo1Nu+wCtUvbp1g3i71szJXhVv/yjNKCZVhXKub/AEPu3AudCyko4w/VP8WLRBNiNn jVRqXB6LiBNjnO1utGhJm0ZUhWraqVh+QcMkbSxPwX01DYAm3G2T3I2P1yoiYZN8IhUU1v GtnNjD22/1fCPy0TFTiFqvquOEzLwDHjSBb27AHRx5+xyDwhLhxNTH7HFkIlxA== From: Paulo Alcantara To: Pavel Shilovsky Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien?= Aptel , linux-cifs Subject: Re: [PATCH cifs-utils] mount.cifs: handle multiple ip addresses per hostname In-Reply-To: References: <20210511163952.11670-1-pc@cjr.nz> <8735uttb7s.fsf@suse.com> <877dk5jfny.fsf@cjr.nz> Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 11:50:54 -0300 Message-ID: <87sg0nr169.fsf@cjr.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Hi Pavel, Pavel Shilovsky writes: > Are you planning to post another version of this patch? If there is > already one HI which I missed, please let me know. Not for now, thanks. I would have to repost the multip support in cifs.ko and rebase it against current for-next. Then figure out a way properly handle the different kernel versions and/or compatibility features in cifs-utils so we can decide whether or not let the kernel retry all ip addresses at mount time. I'll let you know.